Within the limits of experimental error, show that the law of conservation of mass was obeyed in the following experiment: \(10.00 \mathrm{g}\) calcium carbonate (found in limestone) was dissolved in 100.0 mL hydrochloric acid \((d=1.148 \mathrm{g} / \mathrm{mL}) .\) The products were \(120.40 \mathrm{g}\) solution (a mixture of hydrochloric acid and calcium chloride) and 2.22 L carbon dioxide gas \((d=1.9769 \mathrm{g} / \mathrm{L})\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
The law of conservation of mass is confirmed in this experiment as the total mass of the reactants (124.8 g) is approximately equivalent to the total mass of the products (124.78 g), within the limits of experimental error.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate the mass of the hydrochloric acid

First, recall that density is mass/volume. Therefore, the mass of the hydrochloric acid is equal to its density times its volume, which is \(1.148 \mathrm{g/mL} \times 100.0 \mathrm{mL} = 114.8 \mathrm{g}\).
02

Calculate the total mass of the reactants

Add the mass of the calcium carbonate and the mass of the hydrochloric acid to find the total mass of the reactants. This equals \(10.00 \mathrm{g} + 114.8 \mathrm{g} = 124.8 \mathrm{g}\).
03

Calculate the mass of the carbon dioxide

Again, using the density is mass/volume formula, the mass of the carbon dioxide is \(1.9769 \mathrm{g/L} \times 2.22 \mathrm{L} = 4.38 \mathrm{g}\).
04

Calculate the total mass of the products

Add the mass of the solution and the mass of the carbon dioxide to find the total mass of the products. This equals \(120.40 \mathrm{g} + 4.38 \mathrm{g} = 124.78 \mathrm{g}\).
05

Compare the total mass of the reactants with the total mass of the products

Comparing the total mass of reactants and the total mass of products, they are \(124.8 \mathrm{g}\) and \(124.78 \mathrm{g}\), respectively, which within the limits of experimental error, are equivalent thus confirming the law of conservation of mass.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Americium-241 is a radioactive isotope that is used in high-precision gas and smoke detectors. How many neutrons, protons, and electrons are there in an atom of americium-241?

The two species that have the same number of electrons as \(^{3}\) th S are (a) \(^{32} \mathrm{Cl} ;\) (b) \(^{34} \mathrm{S}^{+} ;\) (c) \(^{33} \mathrm{P}^{+} ;\) (d) \(^{28} \mathrm{Si}^{2-}\) (e) \(^{35} S^{2-} ;(f)^{40} A r^{2+} ;(g)^{40} C a^{2+}\)

The German chemist Fritz Haber proposed paying off the reparations imposed against Germany after World War I by extracting gold from seawater. Given that (1) the amount of the reparations was \(\$ 28.8\) billion dollars, (2) the value of gold at the time was about \(\$ 21.25\) per troy ounce ( \(1 \text { troy ounce }=31.103 \mathrm{g}),\) and (3) gold occurs in seawater to the extent of \(4.67 \times 10^{17}\) atoms per ton of seawater \((1 \text { ton }=2000\) lb), how many cubic kilometers of seawater would have had to be processed to obtain the required amount of gold? Assume that the density of seawater is \(1.03 \mathrm{g} / \mathrm{cm}^{3}\) (Haber's scheme proved to be commercially infeasible, and the reparations were never fully paid.)

William Prout (1815) proposed that all other atoms are built up of hydrogen atoms, suggesting that all elements should have integral atomic masses based on an atomic mass of one for hydrogen. This hypothesis appeared discredited by the discovery of atomic masses, such as 24.3 u for magnesium and 35.5 u for chlorine. In terms of modern knowledge, explain why Prout's hypothesis is actually quite reasonable.

When an iron object rusts, its mass increases. When a match burns, its mass decreases. Do these observations violate the law of conservation of mass? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free