The packing fraction of a nuclide is related to the fraction of the total mass of a nuclide that is converted to nuclear binding energy. It is defined as the fraction \((M-A) / A,\) where \(M\) is the actual nuclidic mass and \(A\) is the mass number. Use data from a handbook (such as the Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, published by the CRC Press) to determine the packing fractions of some representative nuclides. Plot a graph of packing fraction versus mass number, and compare it with Figure \(25-6 .\) Explain the relationship between the two.

Short Answer

Expert verified
This exercise involves determining the packing fractions of some representative nuclides, plotting a graph of packing fraction versus mass number, and comparing it with Figure \(25-6\). The packing fraction is calculated using the formula \((M-A) / A\), where \(M\) is the actual nuclidic mass and \(A\) is the mass number. Through comparison of the graph with Figure \(25-6\), we explain the relationship between the packing fraction and the mass number.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Packing Fraction

The packing fraction defines the fraction of the total mass of a nuclide that is converted to nuclear binding energy. It's given as \((M-A) / A\), where \(M\) represents the actual nuclide mass and \(A\) is the mass number.
02

Calculate the Packing Fractions

To calculate the packing fractions of representative nuclides, we determine the values of \(M\) and \(A\) for each nuclide from a reliable source like 'Handbook of Chemistry and Physics'. Then we substitute these values into the formula \((M-A) / A\) for each nuclide to get the packing fractions. For example, if for nuclide 1, \(M = 4\) and \(A = 2\), then the packing fraction will be \((4-2) / 2 = 1.0\). We repeat this process for all nuclides.
03

Plot the Graph

Once we have calculated the packing fractions for our representative nuclides, we proceed to plot a graph of packing fraction against mass number. This is typically done using graphing software or a spreadsheet. Using a scatter plot would be most appropriate for this task as it would allow us to clearly see the changes in packing fraction with changes in mass number.
04

Compare with Figure \(25-6\)

Upon plotting our graph, we then need to compare it with Figure \(25-6\). This requires us to analyze the differences and similarities, and explain any patterns and trends observed between our graph and Figure \(25-6\).
05

Explain the Relationship Between the Two

The final part of the exercise is understanding and explaining the correlation or relationship between our plot and Figure \(25-6\). We should look at if as the packing fraction increases, the mass number also increases in the same manner in both graphs or if there are differences, and what causes those differences.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

An ester forms from a carboxylic acid and an alcohol. $$\mathrm{RCO}_{2} \mathrm{H}+\mathrm{HOR}^{\prime} \longrightarrow \mathrm{RCO}_{2} \mathrm{R}^{\prime}+\mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{O}.$$ This reaction is superficially similar to the reaction of an acid with a base such as sodium hydroxide. The mechanism of the reaction can be followed by using the tracer \(^{18} \mathrm{O}\). This isotope is not radioactive, but other physical measurements can be used to detect its presence. When the esterifcation reaction is carried out with the alcohol containing oxygen-18 atoms, no oxygen-18 beyond its naturally occurring abundance is found in the water produced. How does this result affect the perception that this reaction is like an acid-base reaction?

The overall change in the radioactive decay of \({238}_{92} \mathrm{U}\)to 206 \(\mathrm{Pb}\) is the emission of eight \(\alpha\) particles. Show that if \(_{82}^{206} \mathrm{Pb}\)this loss of eight \(\alpha\) particles were not also accompanied by six \(\beta^{-}\) emissions, the product nucleus would still be radioactive.

One member each of the following pairs of radioisotopes decays by \(\beta^{-}\) emission, and the other by positron \(\left(\beta^{+}\right)\) emission: \((\mathrm{a})_{15}^{29} \mathrm{P}\) and \(_{15}^{33} \mathrm{P} ;(\mathrm{b}) \stackrel{120}{53} \mathrm{I}\) and \(_{53}^{134} \mathrm{I} .\) Which is which? Explain your reasoning.

For medical uses, radon-222 formed in the radioactive decay of radium-226 is allowed to collect over the radium metal. Then, the gas is withdrawn and sealed into a glass vial. Following this, the radium is allowed to disintegrate for another period, when a new sample of radon- 222 can be withdrawn. The procedure can be continued indefinitely. The process is somewhat complicated by the fact that radon-222 itself undergoes radioactive decay to polonium- 218 , and so on. The half-lives of radium-226 and radon-222 are \(1.60 \times 10^{3}\) years and 3.82 days, respectively.(a) Beginning with pure radium- \(226,\) the number of radon-222 atoms present starts at zero, increases for a time, and then falls off again. Explain this behavior. That is, because the half-life of radon-222 is so much shorter than that of radium- \(226,\) why doesn't the radon-222 simply decay as fast as it is produced, without ever building up to a maximum concentration?(b) Write an expression for the rate of change \((d \mathrm{D} / d t)\) in the number of atoms (D) of the radon- 222 daughter in terms of the number of radium- 226 atoms present initially ( \(\mathrm{P}_{0}\) ) and the decay constants of the parent \(\left(\lambda_{\mathrm{p}}\right)\) and daughter \(\left(\lambda_{\mathrm{d}}\right)\) (c) Integration of the expression obtained in part (b) yields the following expression for the number of atoms of the radon-222 daughter (D) present at a time \(t\).$$\mathrm{D}=\frac{\mathrm{P}_{0} \lambda_{\mathrm{p}}\left(\mathrm{e}^{-\lambda_{\mathrm{p}} \times t}-\mathrm{e}^{-\lambda_{\mathrm{d}} \times t}\right)}{\lambda_{\mathrm{d}}-\lambda_{\mathrm{p}}}$$,Starting with \(1.00 \mathrm{g}\) of pure radium- \(226,\) approximately how long will it take for the amount of radon222 to reach its maximum value: one day, one week, one year, one century, or one millennium?

The following reactions are carried out with HCl(aq) containing some tritium ( \(_{1}^{3} \mathrm{H}\) ) as a tracer. Would you expect any of the tritium radioactivity to appear in the \(\mathrm{NH}_{3}(\mathrm{g}) ?\) In the \(\mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{O} ?\) Explain. $$\begin{array}{c} \mathrm{NH}_{3}(\mathrm{aq})+\mathrm{HCl}(\mathrm{aq}) \longrightarrow \mathrm{NH}_{4} \mathrm{Cl}(\mathrm{aq}) \\ \mathrm{NH}_{4} \mathrm{Cl}(\mathrm{aq})+\mathrm{NaOH}(\mathrm{aq}) \longrightarrow\\\\\mathrm{NaCl}(\mathrm{aq})+\mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{O}(1)+\mathrm{NH}_{3}(\mathrm{g})\end{array}$$

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free