A student placed \(1 \mathrm{~g}\) of each of three compounds \(\mathrm{A}\) \(\mathrm{B},\) and \(\mathrm{C}\) in a container and found that after 1 week no change had occurred. Offer some possible explanations for the fact that no reactions took place. Assume that \(\mathrm{A}, \mathrm{B},\) and \(\mathrm{C}\) are totally miscible liquids.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Possible explanations for no reaction taking place might be the high chemical stability of the compounds A, B, and C, non-conducive conditions for reactions within the container such as temperature or pressure, absence of a necessary catalyst or inadequate concentration of the compounds.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Concept of a Chemical Reaction

A chemical reaction occurs when substance A reacts with substance B to form a new substance C, or when a single compound breaks down into two or more substances. For a reaction to occur, the reactants must come into direct chemical contact with each other. The rate at which a reaction proceeds can be influenced by several factors such as the presence of a catalyst, concentration of reactants, temperature, and pressure.
02

Analyze Given Compounds A, B and C

Given the fact that no reaction occurred, it can be hypothesized that either the conditions necessitating a reaction were missing, or that the three compounds are inert or stable and do not easily undergo reactions.
03

Possible Reasons for No Reaction

One possible reason that no reaction occurred could be that all compounds A, B and C are chemically stable and do not easily react with other substances. Another possible explanation is that the conditions in the container (e.g., temperature, pressure) were not conducive to facilitating a reaction between the compounds. It is also possible that a catalyst was required to trigger the reaction, but it was missing. The concentration of the compounds could also have been too low to initiate a reaction.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The molar heat of vaporization of ethanol is \(39.3 \mathrm{~kJ} / \mathrm{mol}\) and the boiling point of ethanol is \(78.3^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) Calculate \(\Delta S\) for the vaporization of \(0.50 \mathrm{~mol}\) ethanol.

Which of the following processes are spontaneous and which are nonspontaneous at a given temperature? (a) \(\mathrm{NaNO}_{3}(s) \stackrel{\mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{O}}{\longrightarrow} \mathrm{NaNO}_{3}(a q)\) saturated soln (b) \(\mathrm{NaNO}_{3}(s) \stackrel{\mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{O}}{\longrightarrow} \mathrm{NaNO}_{3}(a q) \quad\) unsaturated soln (c) \(\mathrm{NaNO}_{3}(s) \stackrel{\mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{O}}{\longrightarrow} \mathrm{NaNO}_{3}(a q)\) supersaturated soln

For each pair of substances listed here, choose the one having the larger standard entropy value at \(25^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\). The same molar amount is used in the comparison. Explain the basis for your choice. (a) \(\operatorname{Li}(s)\) or \(\operatorname{Li}(l)\) (b) \(\mathrm{C}_{2} \mathrm{H}_{5} \mathrm{OH}(l)\) or \(\mathrm{CH}_{3} \mathrm{OCH}_{3}(l)\) (c) \(\operatorname{Ar}(g)\) or \(\operatorname{Xe}(g)\) (d) \(\mathrm{CO}(g)\) or \(\mathrm{CO}_{2}(g)\) (e) \(\mathrm{O}_{2}(g)\) or \(\mathrm{O}_{3}(g)\) (f) \(\mathrm{NO}_{2}(g)\) or \(\mathrm{N}_{2} \mathrm{O}_{4}(g)\)

Ammonium nitrate \(\left(\mathrm{NH}_{4} \mathrm{NO}_{3}\right)\) dissolves spontaneously and endothermically in water. What can you deduce about the sign of \(\Delta S\) for the solution process?

A student looked up the \(\Delta G_{\mathrm{f}}^{\circ}, \Delta H_{\mathrm{f}}^{\circ}\), and \(S^{\circ}\) values for \(\mathrm{CO}_{2}\) in Appendix 2. Plugging these values into Equation \((18.10),\) he found that \(\Delta G_{\mathrm{f}}^{\circ} \neq \Delta H_{\mathrm{f}}^{\circ}-T S^{\circ}\) at \(298 \mathrm{~K}\). What is wrong with his approach?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free