Chapter 16: Problem 71
Which metal has the least tendency to be oxidized? (a) \(\mathrm{Ag}\) (b) \(\mathrm{Na}\) (c) \(\mathrm{Ni}\) (d) \(\mathrm{Pb}\)
Short Answer
Expert verified
Silver (\text{Ag}) has the least tendency to be oxidized due to its highest positive standard reduction potential among the given options.
Step by step solution
01
Understanding Oxidation Tendencies
The tendency of a metal to be oxidized can be understood by examining its standard reduction potential. Metals with higher reduction potentials have a lower tendency to be oxidized, since they are more likely to gain electrons (be reduced) than lose them (be oxidized).
02
Consult Standard Reduction Potential Table
To determine which metal has the least tendency to be oxidized, look up the standard reduction potentials for each metal in a table. The metal with the highest positive standard reduction potential will be the least likely to be oxidized.
03
Comparing the Metals
Upon consulting a standard reduction potential table, the potentials for each metal are found to be: \(\mathrm{Ag^+ + e^- \rightarrow Ag}\) has a high positive potential, \(\mathrm{Na^+ + e^- \rightarrow Na}\) has a low negative potential, \(\mathrm{Ni^{2+} + 2e^- \rightarrow Ni}\) has a low positive potential, and \(\mathrm{Pb^{2+} + 2e^- \rightarrow Pb}\) has a moderate positive potential. Therefore, silver (Ag) has the highest positive standard reduction potential, which indicates it has the least tendency to be oxidized.
Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!
-
Full Textbook Solutions
Get detailed explanations and key concepts
-
Unlimited Al creation
Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...
-
Ads-free access
To over 500 millions flashcards
-
Money-back guarantee
We refund you if you fail your exam.
Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!
Key Concepts
These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.
Oxidation-Reduction Reactions
In the realm of chemistry, oxidation-reduction reactions, often called redox reactions, form the basis of many important processes, both industrial and biological. These reactions encompass the transfer of electrons between substances. Oxidation refers to the loss of electrons, while reduction refers to the gain of electrons. A simple mnemonic to remember this is 'LEO the lion says GER'—Lose Electrons Oxidation and Gain Electrons Reduction.
For students grappling with the concept, envisioning redox reactions as a form of 'chemical currency exchange' can be illustrative. In this exchange, electrons are the currency, shifting ownership between reaction partners. Oxidizing agents accept electrons, thereby becoming reduced, whereas reducing agents dole out electrons, becoming oxidized in the process. The meat of redox chemistry is thus a balancing act, maintaining an electron ledger that keeps track of these transactions to determine the outcome of the reaction.
For students grappling with the concept, envisioning redox reactions as a form of 'chemical currency exchange' can be illustrative. In this exchange, electrons are the currency, shifting ownership between reaction partners. Oxidizing agents accept electrons, thereby becoming reduced, whereas reducing agents dole out electrons, becoming oxidized in the process. The meat of redox chemistry is thus a balancing act, maintaining an electron ledger that keeps track of these transactions to determine the outcome of the reaction.
Standard Reduction Potential
The standard reduction potential is essentially a measure of the tendency of a chemical species to acquire electrons and thus be reduced. It is expressed in volts and can be found in standard reduction potential tables that list these values for a variety of substances under standard conditions. These values are crucial for predicting the direction of redox reactions and determining which substance in a given pair has a stronger preference for electrons.
To interpret these tables, remember that the more positive the standard reduction potential, the greater the substance's affinity for electrons. Conversely, a more negative potential indicates a weaker desire for electrons, rendering that substance a better electron donor, or reducing agent. It's an invaluable tool for students who wish to understand the likelihood of various redox reactions occurring and for comparing different substances' reactivity.
To interpret these tables, remember that the more positive the standard reduction potential, the greater the substance's affinity for electrons. Conversely, a more negative potential indicates a weaker desire for electrons, rendering that substance a better electron donor, or reducing agent. It's an invaluable tool for students who wish to understand the likelihood of various redox reactions occurring and for comparing different substances' reactivity.
Metal Reactivity
When we talk about the reactivity of metals, we're discussing their tendency to engage in chemical reactions, particularly their inclination to lose electrons to form positive ions. The reactivity series is a way of ranking metals based on their reactivity, which often correlates with their position in the periodic table. Metals like sodium (Na) that are highly reactive readily lose electrons and are prone to oxidation, whereas metals like gold and silver (Ag) are less reactive and have a lower tendency to give up electrons.
Understanding the factors affecting metal reactivity, such as atomic size, ionization energy, and the presence of stable electron configurations, reinforces students' grasp of how metals will behave in different chemical scenarios. For example, sodium's high reactivity can be ascribed to its larger atomic size and lower ionization energy compared to silver, making it easier for sodium to lose its outer electron.
Understanding the factors affecting metal reactivity, such as atomic size, ionization energy, and the presence of stable electron configurations, reinforces students' grasp of how metals will behave in different chemical scenarios. For example, sodium's high reactivity can be ascribed to its larger atomic size and lower ionization energy compared to silver, making it easier for sodium to lose its outer electron.
Chemical Education
Effective chemical education bridges the gap between abstract concepts and their tangible applications. It involves not only memorizing facts and formulas but also developing a deep understanding of the principles governing chemical behavior. This includes conceptual clarity, problem-solving skills, and the ability to apply knowledge in new contexts.
When educators provide content that makes challenging concepts like oxidation-reduction reactions and reduction potentials accessible, they empower students to integrate this knowledge seamlessly into their own analytical toolkit. Strategies such as step-by-step explanations, real-world examples, and interactive exercises enhance comprehension and retention. By nurturing this foundation, students become adept at predicting chemical reactions and understanding the underlying factors that drive them.
When educators provide content that makes challenging concepts like oxidation-reduction reactions and reduction potentials accessible, they empower students to integrate this knowledge seamlessly into their own analytical toolkit. Strategies such as step-by-step explanations, real-world examples, and interactive exercises enhance comprehension and retention. By nurturing this foundation, students become adept at predicting chemical reactions and understanding the underlying factors that drive them.