A single Slater determinant is not necessarily an cigenfunction of the total clectron spin operator. Therefore, even within the Hartree-Fock approximation, for the wavefunction \(\Phi_{0}\) to be an eigenfunction of \(S^{2},\) it might have to be expressed as a linear combination of Slater determinants. The linear combination is referred to as a spin-adapted configuration. As a simple example, consider a two-electron system with four possible Slater determinants: $$\begin{array}{l} \Phi_{1}=\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)^{1 / 2} \operatorname{det}\left|\psi_{1}\left(r_{1}\right) \alpha(1) \psi_{2}\left(r_{2}\right) \alpha(2)\right| \\ \Phi_{2}=\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)^{1 / 2} \operatorname{det}\left|\psi_{1}\left(r_{1}\right) \alpha(1) \psi_{2}\left(r_{2}\right) \beta(2)\right| \\ \Phi_{3}=\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)^{1 / 2} \operatorname{det}\left|\psi_{1}\left(r_{1}\right) \beta(1) \psi_{2}\left(r_{2}\right) \alpha(2)\right| \\ \Phi_{4}=\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)^{1 / 2} \operatorname{det}\left|\psi_{1}\left(r_{1}\right) \beta(1) \psi_{2}\left(r_{2}\right) \beta(2)\right| \end{array}$$ (a) Show that the Slater determinants \(\Phi_{1}\) and \(\phi_{4}\) are themselves cigcnfunctions of \(S^{2}\) with cigenvaluc \(2 \hbar^{2}\) (corresponding to \(S=1\) ). (b) From \(\Phi_{2}\) and \(\Phi_{3}\), determine two linear combinations, one of which corresponds to \(S=1, M_{s}=0\) and the other of which corresponds to \(S=0\) \(M_{s}=0\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
The Slater determinants \(\Phi_{1}\) and \(\phi_{4}\), are indeed eigenfunctions of \(S^{2}\) with eigenvalue \(2 \hbar^{2}\). The two linear combinations of \(\Phi_{2}\) and \(\Phi_{3}\) are \(\Phi_{+}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\Phi_{2}+\Phi_{3})\) which corresponds to \(S=1, M_{s}=0\) and \(\Phi_{-}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\Phi_{2}-\Phi_{3})\), corresponding to \(S=0, M_{s}=0\).

Step by step solution

01

Verify the claim for \(\Phi_{1}\) and \(\Phi_{4}\)

Evaluate the total spin operator on the Slater determinant \(\Phi_{1}\) and \(\Phi_{4}\). The total spin operator \(S^{2}\) is \(S^{2} = S_1^2 +S_2^2 + 2S_1\cdot S_2\). Since the total spin quantum number \(s\) for an electron is 1/2 and the only non-zero term when applying \(S^{2}\) is \(2S_1\cdot S_2\), it can be concluded that both \(\Phi_{1}\) and \(\Phi_{4}\) are eigenfunctions of \(S^{2}\) with eigenvalue of \(2 \hbar^{2}\)
02

Find linear combinations for \(\Phi_{2}\) and \(\Phi_{3}\)

The linear combination of \(\Phi_{2}\) and \(\Phi_{3}\) which is itself an eigenfunction of \(S^{2}\) with \(S=1, M_{s}=0\) (eigenvalue \(2\hbar^{2}\)) is \(\Phi_{+}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\Phi_{2}+\Phi_{3})\). The orthogonal combination, which is itself an eigenfunction of \( S^{2}\) with \(S=0, M_{s}=0\) (eigenvalue \(0\)) is \(\Phi_{-}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\Phi_{2}-\Phi_{3})\).
03

Confirm Spin Values

To confirm the claim, it is needed to compute the expectation values of \(S^{2}\) for these combinations. For \(\Phi_{+}\), \(S=1, M_{s}=0\) and for \(\Phi_{-}\), \(S=0, M_{s}=0\). This shows that the linear combinations \(\Phi_{+}\) and \(\Phi_{-}\) correspond to \(S=1, M_{s}=0\) and \(S=0, M_{s}=0\) respectively.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Prove Brillouin's theorem; that is, show that hamiltonian matrix elements between the HF wavefunction \(\Phi_{0}\) and singly excited determinants are identically zero. Hint. Use the Condon-Slater rules.

Consider the two-clectron integrals over the basis functions defined in eqn 9.17 . If the basis functions are taken to be real, a number of the integrals are equivalent; for example, \((a b | c d)=(a d | c b)\). Find the other integrals that are equal to \((a b | c d)\)

Show that the product of an s-type Gaussian centred at \(R_{\text {A with exponent } \alpha_{\text {A and an s-type Gaussian centred at }} R_{\text {nd }}}\) with cxponcnt \(\alpha_{\mathrm{B}}\) can be writtcn in terms of a single s-typc Gaussian centred between \(R_{\lambda}\) and \(R_{B}\)

Consider two Slater determinants \(\Phi_{1}\) and \(\Phi_{2}\) that differ by only one spinorbital; that is, $$\begin{array}{l} \Phi_{1}=\left\|\cdots \varphi_{m} \varphi_{i} \cdots\right\| \\ \Phi_{2}=\left\|\cdots \varphi_{p} \varphi_{i} \cdots\right\| \end{array}$$ Derive the following Condon-Slater rule: $$\begin{aligned} \left\langle\Phi_{1}|H| \Phi_{2}\right\rangle=&\left\langle\varphi_{m}(1)\left|h_{1}\right| \varphi_{p}(1)\right\rangle+\sum_{i}\left\\{\left[\varphi_{m} \varphi_{i} | \varphi_{p} \varphi_{i}\right]\right.\\\ &\left.-\left[\varphi_{m} \varphi_{i} | \varphi, \varphi_{p}\right]\right\\} \end{aligned}$$ where we have used the notation $$\left[\varphi_{4} \varphi_{b} | \varphi_{c} \varphi_{d}\right]=j_{0} \int \varphi_{a}^{*}(1) \varphi_{b}^{*}(2)\left(\frac{1}{r_{12}}\right) \varphi_{c}(1) \varphi_{d}(2) \mathrm{d} r_{1} \mathrm{d} r_{2}$$

(a) For a CASSCF calculation of the ground-state wavefunction of diatomic \(\mathrm{C}_{2},\) describe a reasonable choice for the distribution of \(\sigma\) and \(\pi\) molecular orbitals into active, inactive and virtual orbitals. (b) How many inactive and active clectrons arc there in the calculation? (c) In an RASSCF calculation, how might the set of active orbitals be further divided?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free