Prove Brillouin's theorem; that is, show that hamiltonian matrix elements between the HF wavefunction \(\Phi_{0}\) and singly excited determinants are identically zero. Hint. Use the Condon-Slater rules.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The proof of Brillouin's theorem is established by proving that the matrix elements of the electronic hamiltonian between a Hartree-Fock wave function and a singly excited determinant are zero.

Step by step solution

01

Define the HF wave function and the singly excited determinant

In this step, the Hartree-Fock (HF) wave function \( \Phi_{0} \) and the singly excited determinants \( \Phi_{a}^{r} \) are defined. Here, \( \Phi_{0} \) is a determinant where each molecular orbital is occupied by two electrons, while \( \Phi_{a}^{r} \) represents the determinant where one electron is promoted from a molecular orbital a to a higher molecular orbital r.
02

Apply the Condon-Slater rule

According to the Condon-Slater rules, the integral of an electron-nuclear attraction energy between two determinants is zero unless the two determinants differ by at most a single spin-orbital, both in the placement of electrons and in the spatial parts of the spin orbitals. Hence, it is clear that the integral over a one-electron operator between \( \Phi_{0} \) and \( \Phi_{a}^{r} \) is zero, because the two determinants differ in two orbitals: a and r. Similarly, the integral over the two-electron operator between \( \Phi_{0} \) and \( \Phi_{a}^{r} \) is zero because the two determinants differ in two orbitals. Therefore, by the Condon-Slater rules, the matrix element of the Hamiltonian between \( \Phi_{0} \) and \( \Phi_{a}^{r} \) is zero.
03

Conclude Brillouin's Theorem

Since the matrix element of the Hamiltonian between \( \Phi_{0} \) and \( \Phi_{a}^{r} \) has been proven to be zero using the Condon-Slater rules, this implies that the Hamiltonian matrix elements between the HF wave function and singly excited determinants are identically zero, as stated by Brillouin's theorem. This concludes the proof of Brillouin's theorem.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider two Slater determinants \(\Phi_{1}\) and \(\Phi_{2}\) that differ by only one spinorbital; that is, $$\begin{array}{l} \Phi_{1}=\left\|\cdots \varphi_{m} \varphi_{i} \cdots\right\| \\ \Phi_{2}=\left\|\cdots \varphi_{p} \varphi_{i} \cdots\right\| \end{array}$$ Derive the following Condon-Slater rule: $$\begin{aligned} \left\langle\Phi_{1}|H| \Phi_{2}\right\rangle=&\left\langle\varphi_{m}(1)\left|h_{1}\right| \varphi_{p}(1)\right\rangle+\sum_{i}\left\\{\left[\varphi_{m} \varphi_{i} | \varphi_{p} \varphi_{i}\right]\right.\\\ &\left.-\left[\varphi_{m} \varphi_{i} | \varphi, \varphi_{p}\right]\right\\} \end{aligned}$$ where we have used the notation $$\left[\varphi_{4} \varphi_{b} | \varphi_{c} \varphi_{d}\right]=j_{0} \int \varphi_{a}^{*}(1) \varphi_{b}^{*}(2)\left(\frac{1}{r_{12}}\right) \varphi_{c}(1) \varphi_{d}(2) \mathrm{d} r_{1} \mathrm{d} r_{2}$$

Show that the product of an s-type Gaussian centred at \(R_{\text {A with exponent } \alpha_{\text {A and an s-type Gaussian centred at }} R_{\text {nd }}}\) with cxponcnt \(\alpha_{\mathrm{B}}\) can be writtcn in terms of a single s-typc Gaussian centred between \(R_{\lambda}\) and \(R_{B}\)

Use the AM1 and PM3 semiempirical methods to compute the equilibrium bond lengths and enthalpies of formation of (a) ethanol, (b) 1,4 -dichlorobenzene.

Consider the two-clectron integrals over the basis functions defined in eqn 9.17 . If the basis functions are taken to be real, a number of the integrals are equivalent; for example, \((a b | c d)=(a d | c b)\). Find the other integrals that are equal to \((a b | c d)\)

(a) For a CASSCF calculation of the ground-state wavefunction of diatomic \(\mathrm{C}_{2},\) describe a reasonable choice for the distribution of \(\sigma\) and \(\pi\) molecular orbitals into active, inactive and virtual orbitals. (b) How many inactive and active clectrons arc there in the calculation? (c) In an RASSCF calculation, how might the set of active orbitals be further divided?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free