Chapter 7: Problem 8
Which one of the sixth group elements has the highest catenation power? (a) \(\mathrm{O}\) (b) \(\mathrm{S}\) (c) Se (d) \(\mathrm{Te}\)
Short Answer
Expert verified
Oxygen (O) has the highest catenation power among the given elements.
Step by step solution
01
Understanding Catenation
Catenation is the ability of an element to form bonds with other atoms of the same element, resulting in a chain or a ring structure. Generally, catenation ability decreases as we move down a group in the periodic table because the atomic size increases, making the bonds longer and weaker.
02
Consider the Position in the Periodic Table
To determine the element with the highest catenation power in the sixth group of the periodic table, we must look at their positions. Oxygen (O) is at the top, followed by sulfur (S), selenium (Se), and then tellurium (Te) as we move down the group.
03
Comparing Catenation Power
Since the strength of the bond between like atoms typically decreases down the group due to increasing atomic radius and decreasing bond energy, oxygen, being the smallest and lightest, would have the strongest bonds with itself, followed by sulfur, selenium, and tellurium in that order.
04
Conclude the Highest Catenation Power
Thus, oxygen (O), being the lightest and having the smallest atomic radius in the group, will form the strongest double bonds with itself and will exhibit the highest catenation power among the choices given.
Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!
-
Full Textbook Solutions
Get detailed explanations and key concepts
-
Unlimited Al creation
Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...
-
Ads-free access
To over 500 millions flashcards
-
Money-back guarantee
We refund you if you fail your exam.
Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!
Key Concepts
These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.
Understanding the Periodic Table
The periodic table is a fundamental tool in chemistry, organizing all known elements by increasing atomic number and similar chemical properties into a tabular layout. Elements are arranged into groups (vertical columns) and periods (horizontal rows).
When examining catenation power, the periodic table can provide crucial information about an element's properties. For example, in the sixth group or the chalcogens, elements are ordered from top to bottom by increasing atomic number. This arrangement is not just for convenience; as we move down a group, the elements exhibit a trend in properties such as atomic size, electronegativity, and bond strength.
Therefore, a deeper understanding of these trends on the periodic table can help predict an element's ability to catenate. For instance, elements in the same group will have the same number of valence electrons, which means they have similar types of chemical bonding behaviors.
When examining catenation power, the periodic table can provide crucial information about an element's properties. For example, in the sixth group or the chalcogens, elements are ordered from top to bottom by increasing atomic number. This arrangement is not just for convenience; as we move down a group, the elements exhibit a trend in properties such as atomic size, electronegativity, and bond strength.
Therefore, a deeper understanding of these trends on the periodic table can help predict an element's ability to catenate. For instance, elements in the same group will have the same number of valence electrons, which means they have similar types of chemical bonding behaviors.
Basics of Chemical Bonding
Chemical bonding is the force that holds atoms together in molecules and compounds. There are several types of chemical bonds, such as covalent, ionic, and metallic bonds. In the context of catenation, we focus on covalent bonds, which involve the sharing of electron pairs between atoms.
Catenation is inherently related to covalent bonding because it involves an element forming bonds with itself. To understand an element's catenation power, one must look at the strength and stability of the covalent bonds it can form. Generally, smaller atoms with higher electronegativities can form stronger covalent bonds because the shared electrons are closer to the nucleus and more tightly held.
For catenation, the strength of the bond plays a crucial role in determining how easily an element can form chains or rings, as these structures require stable connections between atoms to persist. As such, elements higher in a group typically exhibit greater catenation power.
Catenation is inherently related to covalent bonding because it involves an element forming bonds with itself. To understand an element's catenation power, one must look at the strength and stability of the covalent bonds it can form. Generally, smaller atoms with higher electronegativities can form stronger covalent bonds because the shared electrons are closer to the nucleus and more tightly held.
For catenation, the strength of the bond plays a crucial role in determining how easily an element can form chains or rings, as these structures require stable connections between atoms to persist. As such, elements higher in a group typically exhibit greater catenation power.
Influence of Atomic Size on Catenation
Atomic size is a critical factor affecting an element's catenation ability. As atoms increase in size, their nucleus-to-electron distance grows, often resulting in weaker bonds due to the larger radius.
This increase in atomic size down the group is mainly due to the addition of a new electron shell for each subsequent element. Therefore, the valence electrons are located further from the nucleus, and the effective nuclear charge experienced by these electrons is reduced. These changes contribute to a longer and less effective overlap of the electron orbitals during bond formation, which in turn reduces bond strength and catenation power.
Given this information, it's clear why smaller atoms, such as oxygen in the sixth group, would have a significant advantage in forming strong self-bonds compared to their heavier congeners, such as sulfur, selenium, and tellurium. Smaller atomic size equates to more robust and effective bonding, leading to a greater propensity for catenation.
This increase in atomic size down the group is mainly due to the addition of a new electron shell for each subsequent element. Therefore, the valence electrons are located further from the nucleus, and the effective nuclear charge experienced by these electrons is reduced. These changes contribute to a longer and less effective overlap of the electron orbitals during bond formation, which in turn reduces bond strength and catenation power.
Given this information, it's clear why smaller atoms, such as oxygen in the sixth group, would have a significant advantage in forming strong self-bonds compared to their heavier congeners, such as sulfur, selenium, and tellurium. Smaller atomic size equates to more robust and effective bonding, leading to a greater propensity for catenation.