The heat of hydrogenation of cis-2,2,5,5-tetramethyl-3-hexene is \(-154 \mathrm{~kJ}\) (-36.7 kcal)/ \(\mathrm{mol}\), while that of the trans isomer is only \(-119 \mathrm{~kJ}\) (-26.9 kcal) \(/ \mathrm{mol}\). (a) Why is the heat of hydrogenation of the cis isomer so much larger (more negative) than that of the trans isomer? (b) If a catalyst could be found that allowed equilibration of the cis and trans isomers at room temperature (such catalysts do exist), what would be the ratio of trans to is isomers?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Question 1(a): Explain why the heat of hydrogenation of cis-2,2,5,5-tetramethyl-3-hexene is higher (more negative) than its trans isomer. Answer: The heat of hydrogenation for the cis isomer is higher (more negative) than the trans isomer because the cis isomer is less stable due to the greater steric hindrance between its alkyl groups. The less stable an alkene is, the more heat is released upon hydrogenation. Question 1(b): Determine the ratio of trans to cis isomers if a catalyst were found that allowed equilibration of the cis and trans isomers at room temperature. Answer: The ratio of trans to cis isomers would be 125:1, meaning there would be 125 times more of the trans isomer than the cis isomer in equilibrium at room temperature with the given catalyst.

Step by step solution

01

Heading 1: Assess hydrogenation and isomer stabilities

In order to understand the difference between the hydrogenation of cis and trans isomers, we should first discuss the concept of isomer stability. The more stable the alkene is, the less heat is released upon hydrogenation. Cis and trans isomers have different stability levels due to their molecular geometries, which lead to different steric hindrances and stronger or weaker non-bonding interactions.
02

Heading 2: Discuss the stabilities of given cis and trans isomers

In the case of cis-2,2,5,5-tetramethyl-3-hexene, the two larger alkyl groups (the 2 t-butyl groups) are on the same side of the double bond, which causes greater steric repulsion between these groups. Conversely, in the case of trans-2,2,5,5-tetramethyl-3-hexene, the methyl groups are positioned opposite each other, leading to a lower amount of steric hindrance. This means that the cis isomer is generally less stable than the trans isomer.
03

Heading 3: Relate isomer stability to heat of hydrogenation

As we established earlier, the more stable an alkene is, the less heat is released upon hydrogenation. In this case, the cis isomer is less stable due to the greater steric hindrance between alkyl groups. Therefore, more heat is released upon hydrogenation of the cis isomer, leading to a larger (more negative) heat of hydrogenation for the cis isomer compared to the trans isomer.
04

Heading 4: Calculate the ratio of trans to cis isomers

We know that the ratio of isomers at equilibrium is given by the expression: \(K_\text{eq} = \frac{[\text{trans}]}{[\text{cis}]} = \exp{\left( -\frac{\Delta G^\circ}{RT}\right)}\) where \(K_\text{eq}\) is the equilibrium constant, \(\Delta G^\circ\) is the change in Gibbs free energy, \(R\) is the gas constant, and \(T\) is the temperature. To find the ratio of trans to cis isomers, we first need to find the change in Gibbs free energy: \(\Delta G^\circ = \Delta H^\circ - T\Delta S^\circ\) Since we are dealing with hydrogenation reactions, we can use the relationship between the heats of hydrogenation and \(\Delta H^\circ\): \(\Delta H^\circ_\text{cis} = -154~\text{kJ/mol}\) and \(\Delta H^\circ_\text{trans} = -119~\text{kJ/mol}\) We can find the difference between the heats of hydrogenation as: \(\Delta H^\circ_\text{cis-trans} = \Delta H^\circ_\text{trans} - \Delta H^\circ_\text{cis} = 35~\text{kJ/mol}\) Assuming that the difference in entropy, \(\Delta S^\circ\), is negligible (which is reasonable given the structural similarities between the isomers), we can calculate the \(\Delta G^\circ_\text{cis-trans}\): \(\Delta G^\circ_\text{cis-trans} = \Delta H^\circ_\text{cis-trans} = 35~\text{kJ/mol}\) Now we can insert the values into the expression for \(K_\text{eq}\) at room temperature, \(T = 298~\text{K}\), and \(R = 8.314~\text{J/(mol\cdot K)}\): \(K_\text{eq} = \exp{\left(-\frac{35\times10^3~\text{J/mol}}{8.314~\text{J/(mol\cdot K)}\times298~\text{K}}\right)} = 125\) So, the ratio of trans to cis isomers would be 125:1, meaning there would be 125 times more of the trans isomer than the cis isomer in equilibrium at room temperature with the given catalyst.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Write structural formulas for the major organic product(s) formed by reaction of 1-methylcyclohexene with each oxidizing agent. (a) \(\mathrm{OsO}_{4} / \mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{O}_{2}\) (b) \(\mathrm{O}_{3}\) followed by \(\left(\mathrm{CH}_{3}\right)_{2} \mathrm{~S}\)

Show how to convert ethylene to these compounds. (a) Ethane (b) Ethanol (c) Bromoethane (d) 2-Chloroethanol (e) 1,2-Dibromoethane (f) 1 ,2-Ethanediol (g) Chloroethane

As we have seen in this chapter, carbon-carbon double bonds are electron-rich regions and are attacked by electrophiles (for example, HBr); they are not attacked by nucleophiles (for example, diethylamine). However, when the carbon-carbon double bond has a carbonyl group adjacent to it, the double bond reacts readily with nucleophiles by nucleophilic addition (Section \(19.8\) ). Account for the fact that nucleophiles add to a carbon-carbon double bond adjacent to a carbonyl group, and account for the regiochemistry of the reaction.

The 2-propenyl cation appears to be a primary carbocation, and yet it is considerably more stable than a \(1^{\circ}\) carbocation such as the 1 -propyl cation. $$ \begin{array}{lc} \mathrm{CH}_{2}=\mathrm{CH}-\mathrm{CH}_{2}^{+} & \mathrm{CH}_{3}-\mathrm{CH}_{2}-\mathrm{CH}_{2}^{+} \\ \text {2-Propenyl cation } & \text { 1-Propyl cation } \end{array} $$ How would you account for the differences in the stability of the two carbocation?

State the number and kind of stereoisomers formed when \((R)\)-s-methyl-1-pentene is treated with these reagents. Assume that the starting alkene is enantiomerically pure and optically active. Will each product be optically active or inactive?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free