When the high-temperarure supercondactor yttrium barium copper oxide (see Chapter 16 opening and Box 16-3) is heated under flowing H2, the solid remaining at 1OOO°C is a mixture of Y2O3 , BaO, and Cu . The starting material has the formula

YBa2Cu3O7-1 , in which the oxygea stoichiometry varies between 7 and role="math" localid="1663686755590" 6.5x=0to0.5 .

YBa2Cu3O7-2s+3.5-xH2g1000C666.19-16.712Y2O3s+2BaOs+3CusYBa2Cu3O2s+3.5-xH2Og

(a) Thennogruimetric analysis. When 34.397mg of YBa2Cu3O--xwere subjected to this andysis, 31.661mg of solid remained after heating to 1000°C Find the value of x in YBa2Cu3O3-x

(b) Propagation of error. Suppowe that the uncertainty in each mass in part (a) is±0.0012mg . Find the uncertainty in the value of x.

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a)The value of x is 0.2042 .

(b)The uncertainty in the value of x is 0.204±0.004

Step by step solution

01

Using thennogruimetric analysis and propagation of error.

  • Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) is a type of thermal analysis in which the mass of a sample is measured over time as the temperature changes. This measurement yields data on physical phenomena such as phase transitions, absorption, adsorption, and desorption.
  • The effects of a variable's uncertainty on a function are defined as propagation of error (or propagation of uncertainty). It is a statistical calculation based on calculus that is designed to combine uncertainties from multiple variables in order to provide an accurate measurement of uncertainty.
02

Calculating the value of x.

a) consider the following:

MYBa2Cu3O7-x=666.19-16x

First write the expression for the moles of YBa2Cu3O7-x :

nYBa2Cu3O7-x=mMnYBa2Cu3O7-x=34.397mg666.19-16xmg/mmol

Then calculate the moles of oxygen lost during the experiment:

nO=mMnO=34.397-31.661mg16mg/mmolnO=0.171mmol

Next write the following and calculate the value of x :

nOnYBa2Cu3O7-x3.5-x10.17134.397/666.19-16xmg/mmol=3.5-xx=0.2042

Therefore the value of x is 0.2042 .

03

Calculating the moles of oxygen.

b) Calculate the moles of oxygen lost:

nO=34.397±0.002-31.661±0.00216n(O)=2.736±0.002816n(O)=0.171±0.102%

The relative error in the mass would be 0.002/34.397=0.0058%

04

Calculating the uncertainty in the value of x.

The equation with error would then be:

0.171±0.102%34.397±0.0058%/666.19-16mg/mmol=3.5-x0.171±0.102%666.19-16x=3.5-x34.397±0.0058%113.98±0.116-2.736±0.00279x=120.3895±0.00968-34.397±0.002x31.66±0.00346x=6.4715±0.116=0.2044±1.79%=0.204±0.004

Therefore the uncertainty in the value of x is 0.204±0.004.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Write a balanced equation for the combustion of benzoic acid,C6H5CO2H, to giveCO2 and H2O. How many milligrams of and of will be produced by the combustion of 4.635mgof benzoic acid?

Man in the vat problem.15 Long ago, a workman at a dye factory fell into a vat containing hot, concentrated sulfuric and nitric acids. He dissolved completely! Because nobody witnessed the accident, it was necessary to prove that he fell in so that the man’s wife could collect his insurance money. The man weighed 70 kg, and a human body contains |6.3 parts per thousand (mg/g) phosphorus. The acid in the vat was analyzed for phosphorus to see whether it contained a dissolved human.

(a) The vat contained8.00×103Lof liquid, and a 100.0-mL sample was analyzed. If the man did fall into the vat, what is the expected quantity of phosphorus in 100.0 mL?

(b) The 100.0-mL sample was treated with a molybdate reagent that precipitated ammonium phosphomolybdate,(NH4)3[P(Mo12O40)]12H2OThis substance was dried at110°Cto remove waters of hydration and heated to400°Cuntil it reached the constant compositionP2O5×24MoO3, which weighed 0.371 8 g. When a fresh mixture of the same acids (not from the vat) was treated in the same manner, 0.033 1 g ofP2O5×24MoO3(FM3596.46)was produced. This blank determination gives the amount of phosphorus in the starting reagents. TheP2O5×24MoO3that could have come from the dissolved man is therefore0.3718-0.0331=0.3387g.How much phosphorus was present in the 100.0-mL sample? Is this quantity consistent with a dissolved man?

How many grams of AgBr would have been formed from 0.100 g ofRaBr2?

A 1.000-g sample of unknown gave 2.500 g of bis (dimethylglyoximate)nickel (II) (FM 288.91) when analyzed by Reaction 27-7. Find the weight percent of Ni in the unknown.

To find the Ce4+ content of a solid, 4.37 g were dissolved and treated with excess iodate to precipitate Ce(IO3)4. The precipitate was collected, washed well, dried, and ignited to produce 0.104 g of CeO2 (FM 172.114). What was the weight percent of Ce in the original solid?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free