Why is high relative supersaturation undesirable in a gravimetric precipitation?

Short Answer

Expert verified

The high relative supersaturation undesirable in a gravimetric precipitation due to the fast nucleation- suspension of colloids would be higher would isn’t desirable.

Step by step solution

01

Definition

It is an analytical technique that uses a precipitation reaction to separate ions from a solution. The chemical that is added to cause the precipitation is called the precipitant or precipitating agent

02

Formation of Aggregrates

During the process of nucleation in gravimetric precipitation process, molecules are closer to one another in a solution which leads to the formation of aggregrates.

03

Relative supersaturation is undesirable

This process appear to be faster in supersaturated solutions, and due to fast nucleation, suspension of colloids would be higher would isn’t desirable. Therefore, in gravimetric precipitation high relative supersaturation is undesirable.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Write a balanced equation for the combustion of benzoic acid,C6H5CO2H, to giveCO2 and H2O. How many milligrams of and of will be produced by the combustion of 4.635mgof benzoic acid?

Man in the vat problem.15 Long ago, a workman at a dye factory fell into a vat containing hot, concentrated sulfuric and nitric acids. He dissolved completely! Because nobody witnessed the accident, it was necessary to prove that he fell in so that the man’s wife could collect his insurance money. The man weighed 70 kg, and a human body contains |6.3 parts per thousand (mg/g) phosphorus. The acid in the vat was analyzed for phosphorus to see whether it contained a dissolved human.

(a) The vat contained8.00×103Lof liquid, and a 100.0-mL sample was analyzed. If the man did fall into the vat, what is the expected quantity of phosphorus in 100.0 mL?

(b) The 100.0-mL sample was treated with a molybdate reagent that precipitated ammonium phosphomolybdate,(NH4)3[P(Mo12O40)]12H2OThis substance was dried at110°Cto remove waters of hydration and heated to400°Cuntil it reached the constant compositionP2O5×24MoO3, which weighed 0.371 8 g. When a fresh mixture of the same acids (not from the vat) was treated in the same manner, 0.033 1 g ofP2O5×24MoO3(FM3596.46)was produced. This blank determination gives the amount of phosphorus in the starting reagents. TheP2O5×24MoO3that could have come from the dissolved man is therefore0.3718-0.0331=0.3387g.How much phosphorus was present in the 100.0-mL sample? Is this quantity consistent with a dissolved man?

A 0.050 02-g sample of impure piperazine contained 71.29 wt% piperazine (FM 86.136). How many grams of product (FM 206.240) will be formed when this sample is analyzed by Reaction 27-6?

Finely ground mineral (0.6324g)was dissolved in 25 mLof boiling 4M HCland diluted with 175mLH2Ocontaining two drops of methyl red indicator. The solution was heated to100oC,and50mL of warm solution containing2.0g(NH4)2C2O4 were slowly added to precipitateCaC2O4.Then6MNH3 was added until the indicator changed from red to yellow, showing that the liquid was neutral or slightly basic. After slow cooling for 1 h, the liquid was decanted and the solid transferred to a filter crucible and washed with cold10.1wt%(NH4)2C2O4 solution five times until noCl- was detected in the filtrate upon addition ofAgNO3 solution. The crucible was dried at 1 h and then at105°C in a furnace for 2 h.

Ca2++C2O42-105°CCaC2O4+H2O(s)500oCCaCO3(s)

FM 40.078 18.5467 g

The mass of the empty crucible was 18.2311 g and the mass of the crucible with CaCO3was 18.5467 g .

(a) Find the wt% Ca in the mineral.

(b) Why is the unknown solution heated to boiling and the precipitant solution, (NH4)2C2O4 also heated before slowly mixing the two?

(c) What is the purpose of washing the precipitate with0.1wt%(NH4)2C2O4?

(d) What is the purpose of testing the filtrate withAgNO3solution?

How many grams ofBr-were in a sample that produced 1.000 g of

AgBr precipitate (FM 5 187.77)?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free