Statistics of coprecipitation. 17In Experiment 1,200.0mL of solution containing 10.0mg of SO42-(from Na2SO4) were treated with excess Bacl2 solution to precipitate BaSO4 containing some coprecipitated Cl-. To find out how much coprecipitated was present, the precipitate was dissolved in 35mL of 98wt%H2SO4 and boiled to liberate , which was removed by bubbling gas through the H2SO4. The HCI/N2 stream was passed into a reagent solution that reacted with to give a color that was measured. Ten replicate trials gave values of 7.8,9.8,7.8,7.8,7.8,7.8,13,7,12.7,13.7, and 12.7. Experiment 2 was identical to the first one, except that the mL solution also contained of from ). Ten replicate trials gave 7.8,10,8,8.8,7.8,6.9, 8.8, 15.7 , 12.7 , 13.7and 14.7μmolCl-.

(a) Find the mean, standard deviation, and 95% confidence interval for Cl-in each experiment.

(b) Is there a significant difference between the two experiments? What does your answer mean?

(c) If there were no coprecipitate, what mass of BaSO4(FM 233.39) would be expected?

(d) If the coprecipitate is (FM 208.23), what is the average mass of precipitate(BaSO4+BaCl2)in Experiment 1. By what percentage is the mass greater than the mass in part (c)?

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a)The 95% confidence interval = 10.770±2.293μmolof Cl-

(b)There is a significant difference between two experiments.

(C)The mass of BaSO4is 24.295m g .

(d) The average mass of precipitate BaSO4+BaCl2in Experiment 1 is 1.058mg .

Step by step solution

01

Derivation of statistics of coprecipitation.

Coprecipitation (CPT) or co-precipitation is the carrying down by a precipitate of substances that are normally soluble under the conditions used in chemistry. Coprecipitation is an important topic in chemical analysis, where it can be both undesirable and useful.

02

Determining the mean and standard deviation.

(a)To find the mean and standard deviation

Experiment 1

x=10.160μmolCl-s=2.707μmolCl-

95%confidenceinterval=x±tsn95%confidenceinterval=10.160±2.262×1.7071095%confidenceinterval=10.160±1.936μmolofCl-

Experiment 2

x=10.770μmolCl-s=3.205μmolCl-

95% confidence interval=x±tsn

95% confidence interval=10.770±2.262×3.20510

95% confidence interval =10.770±2.293μmolofCl-

Therefore the confidence interval of

(b)Yes there is a significant difference between two experiments.

Spooled=s12n1-1+s22n2-1n1+n2=2.707210-1+3.205210-110+10-2=2.966tcalculated=x-x2Spooledn1n2n1+n2=10.160-19.7702.96610×1010+10=0.61=0.61

Note that tcalculatedhas a positive value due to10.160-10.770=-0.61=0.61

The tcalculated<ttabulatedfor 18°of freedom for $95 \%$ confidence interval - the difference wouldn ' be significant

- our result means that addition of excess Cl-before the precipitation wouldn't lead to coprecipitation ofCl-

03

Calculating the moles of BaSO4

Considering that it is given in the task that we have 10mg of SO42-from Na2SO4we will use that info in order to find the mass of BaSO4

Finding the moles of SO42-

nSO42-=m/M=10×10-3g/96.07g/mol=1.041×10-4mol

04

Calculating the mass of BaSO4

(c)Calculating the mass of BaSO4

mBaSO4=n×M=1.041×10-4mol×208.23g/mol=24.295mg

In Experiment 1, the precipitate included additional 10.10μmolof Cl-which equals to 5.08μmolof BaCl2=1.058mgof BaCl2

(d)The average mass of precipitate BaSO4+BaCl2in Experiment 1 is 1.058mg .

An increase in the mass would be 1.058mg/24.295mg=4.35%and it would represent a significant error for the analysis

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Man in the vat problem.15 Long ago, a workman at a dye factory fell into a vat containing hot, concentrated sulfuric and nitric acids. He dissolved completely! Because nobody witnessed the accident, it was necessary to prove that he fell in so that the man’s wife could collect his insurance money. The man weighed 70 kg, and a human body contains |6.3 parts per thousand (mg/g) phosphorus. The acid in the vat was analyzed for phosphorus to see whether it contained a dissolved human.

(a) The vat contained8.00×103Lof liquid, and a 100.0-mL sample was analyzed. If the man did fall into the vat, what is the expected quantity of phosphorus in 100.0 mL?

(b) The 100.0-mL sample was treated with a molybdate reagent that precipitated ammonium phosphomolybdate,(NH4)3[P(Mo12O40)]12H2OThis substance was dried at110°Cto remove waters of hydration and heated to400°Cuntil it reached the constant compositionP2O5×24MoO3, which weighed 0.371 8 g. When a fresh mixture of the same acids (not from the vat) was treated in the same manner, 0.033 1 g ofP2O5×24MoO3(FM3596.46)was produced. This blank determination gives the amount of phosphorus in the starting reagents. TheP2O5×24MoO3that could have come from the dissolved man is therefore0.3718-0.0331=0.3387g.How much phosphorus was present in the 100.0-mL sample? Is this quantity consistent with a dissolved man?

1.475-g sample containing NH4Cl(FM53.491),K2CO3(FM 138.21), and inert ingredients was dissolved to give 0.100 L of solution. A 25.0-mL aliquot was acidified and treated with excess sodium tetraphenylborate,Na+B(C6H5)4-, to precipitateK+and

NH4+ions completely:

(C6H5)4B-+K+(C6H5)4BK(s)FM358.33(C6H5)4B-+NH4+(C6H5)4BNH4(s)FM337.27

The resulting precipitate amounted to 0.617 g. A fresh 50.0-mL aliquot of the original solution was made alkaline and heated to drive off all theNH3.

NH4++OH-NH3(g)+H2O

It was then acidified and treated with sodium tetraphenylborate to give 0.554 g of precipitate. Find the weight percent ofNH4ClandK2CO3in the original solid.

Why are many ionic precipitates washed with electrolyte solution instead of pure water?

Finely ground mineral (0.6324g)was dissolved in 25 mLof boiling 4M HCland diluted with 175mLH2Ocontaining two drops of methyl red indicator. The solution was heated to100oC,and50mL of warm solution containing2.0g(NH4)2C2O4 were slowly added to precipitateCaC2O4.Then6MNH3 was added until the indicator changed from red to yellow, showing that the liquid was neutral or slightly basic. After slow cooling for 1 h, the liquid was decanted and the solid transferred to a filter crucible and washed with cold10.1wt%(NH4)2C2O4 solution five times until noCl- was detected in the filtrate upon addition ofAgNO3 solution. The crucible was dried at 1 h and then at105°C in a furnace for 2 h.

Ca2++C2O42-105°CCaC2O4+H2O(s)500oCCaCO3(s)

FM 40.078 18.5467 g

The mass of the empty crucible was 18.2311 g and the mass of the crucible with CaCO3was 18.5467 g .

(a) Find the wt% Ca in the mineral.

(b) Why is the unknown solution heated to boiling and the precipitant solution, (NH4)2C2O4 also heated before slowly mixing the two?

(c) What is the purpose of washing the precipitate with0.1wt%(NH4)2C2O4?

(d) What is the purpose of testing the filtrate withAgNO3solution?

The thermogravimetric trace on the next page shows mass loss by Y2(OH)5ClxH2O upon heating. In the first step, waters of hydration are lost to give ~8.1% mass loss. After a decomposition step,19.2% of the original mass is lost. Finally, the composition stabilizes atY2O3 above 8009C.

(a) Find x in the formula Y2(OH)5ClxH2O.Because the 8.1% mass loss is not accurately defined in the experiment, use the 31.8% total mass loss for your calculation.

(b) Suggest a formula for the material remaining at the 19.2% plateau. Be sure that the charges of all ions in your formula sum to 0 . The cation is Y3+.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free