a) UHPLC can provide exquisite resolution when run slowly on long columns or rapid separation with reasonaple resolution if short columns are run fast. the drug acetaminophern run on a 50×2.1mmc18UHPLC column has a retention time of 0.63min and a width at half-height of 2.3s.Find the plate number and plate height. How many1.7μm diameter particles places placed dide-by are equal to one theoretical plate?

b) From figure25-3,we expect an optimum plate height of 4μm how many particles placed side-by- side are equal to one theroretical plate? Do you think the column in (a) is being run for maximum resolution or maximum speed?

Short Answer

Expert verified

UHPLC can provide exquisite resolution when run slowly on long columns.

how many particles placed side-by- side are equal to one theoretical plate.

N=5.55.(37.8s)2(2.3)2N=1500

4μm1.7μm=2.4

(a)N=1500;H=33μm;19.4particle/plate

b) 2.4particle/plate

Step by step solution

01

definition of plate calculated using the formula

a) The number of plates on column can be calculated using the formula

N=5.552.trw21/2

N=5.55.(37.8s)2(2.3)2N=1500

The plate height is:

H=LNH=50mm1500H=0.033mm=33μm

The number of particles that are equal to one theoretical plate is

33μm1.7μm=19.4particle/plate

02

theoretical plate

The number of particles that are placed side-by-side and equal to one theoretical plate is:

4μm1.7μm=2.4particle/plate

The column in task (a) is being run for maximum speed because it has higher plate height and number of particles. b

Hence,

(a)N=1500;H=33μm;19.4particle/plate

b) 2.4particle/plate

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The chromatogram in Box 25-3 shows the supercritical fluid chromatography separation of seven steroids monitored by three detectors.

(a) In the middle chromatogram, ultraviolet detection provides near universal response for the steroids, whereas in the lower chromatogram the ultraviolet detector provides a selective response for a few of the steroids. How can ultraviolet detection act as either a selective or universal detector?

(b) Why is a sloping baseline observed at 210 nm, but the baseline is flat at 254 nm?

(c) Use the baseline disturbance early in the 254 nm chromatogram to measure tm. How does the measured value compare with that predicted using Equation 25-5 given that the column is 25 × 0.46 cm and the flow rate is 2.0 mL/min.

A mixture of 14compounds was subjected to a reversed-phase gradient separation going from 5%to 100%acetonitrile with

a gradient time of 60min. The sample was injected at t =time. All peaks were eluted between 22and 50min.

(a) Is the mixture more suitable for isocratic or gradient elution?

(b) If the next run is a gradient, select the starting and ending %acetonitrile

and the gradient time.

(a) Nonpolar aromatic compounds were separated by HPLC on an octadecyl(C18)bonded phase. The eluent was 65 vol% methanol in water. How would the retention times be affected if 90% methanol were used instead?

(b) Octanoic acid and 1-aminooctane were passed through the same column described in (a), using an eluent of 20% methanol/80% buffer (pH 3.0). State which compound is expected to be eluted first and why.

role="math" localid="1656416023291" CH3CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2CO2HOctanoicacidCH3CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2NH21Aminooctane

(c) Polar solutes were separated by hydrophilic interaction chromatography (HILIC) with a strongly polar bonded phase. How would retention times be affected if eluent were changed from 80 vol% to 90 vol% acetonitrile in water?

(d) Polar solutes were separated by normal-phase chromatographyon bare silica using methyl t-butyl ether and 2-propanol solvent. How would retention times be affected if eluent were changed from 40 vol% to 60 vol% 2-propanol? (Hint: See Table 25-4.)

Why are the relative eluent strengths of solvents in adsorption chromatography fairly independent of solute?

In hydrophilic interaction chromatography (HILIC), why is eluent strength increased by increasing the fraction of water in the mobile phase?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free