EXAMPLE- Particles designated \(50/00\)mesh pass through a 50 mesh sieve bou are retained by a lo0 mesh sieve. Their size is in the range 0.150-0.300 mm.

does not pass is retained for your sample. This procedure gives particles whose diameters are in the range \(0.85 - 1.18\;{\rm{mm}}.\) We refer to the size range as \(16/20{\rm{mesh}}.\)

Suppose that much finer particles of \(80/120\)mesh size (average diameter \( = 152\mu {\rm{m}},\) average volume\( = 1.84\;{\rm{nL}}\)) were used instead. Now the mass containing \({10^4}\) particles is reduced from \(11.0to0.0388\;{\rm{g}}.\) We could analyze a larger sample to reduce the sampling uncertainty for chloride.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The mass of the mesh particle that reduces the \({\rm{KCl}}\)to a \(1\% \)uncertainty is \(0.61{\rm{ }}g.\)

Step by step solution

01

Concept used

The mass of the mesh particle that reduces the \({\rm{KCl}}\)to a \(1\% \)uncertainty must be computed.

In sampling n number of particles, the standard deviation is given as

\({S_{\rm{n}}} = \sqrt {{\rm{npq}}} \)

Where,

The chance of drawing B type particles is\({\rm{q}}\)

02

Step 2:

Solution:

The mass of the mesh particle that reduces the KCl to a\({\rm{1\% }}{\rm{.}}\)uncertainty.

\(1\% \)of\({\rm{KCl}}\)particle has the same standard deviation as \(1\% \) of np.

\({\sigma _{\rm{n}}} = \sqrt {{\rm{npq}}} \)

\({\rm{p}} = 0.01{\rm{q}} = 0.99\)we get \({\rm{n}} = 9.9 \times {10^5}particles\)

Using conventional sieves, the particle diameter is estimated.

Suitable for 170/200 mesh

\( = \frac{{0.090\;{\rm{mm}}(170{\rm{ sievenumber }}) + 0.075\;{\rm{mm}}(200{\rm{ sievenumber }})}}{2} = 0.0825\;{\rm{mm}}\)

\(\frac{4}{3}\pi {(0.0825\;{\rm{mm}})^3} = 2.35 \times {10^{ - 3}}\;{\rm{mL}}\)is used to compute the particle volume.

The mass of 1% chloride is computed as follows:

\(Mass = \left( {9.9 \times {{10}^5}} \right.particle)\left( {0.00236 \times \times {{10}^{ - 6}}\;{\rm{mL}}/} \right.particle)(2.108\;{\rm{g}}/{\rm{mL}}) = 0.61\;{\rm{g}}\)

Conclusion

The mass of the mesh particle that reduces the \({\rm{KCl}}\)to a\({\rm{1\% }}\)uncertainty was computed.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Acid-base equilibria of Cr(III) were summarized in Problem 10-36. Cr(VI) in aqueous solution above pH 6 exists as the yellow tetrahedral chromate ion, \({\rm{CrO}}_4^{2 - }.\)Between\({\rm{pH}}2\)and \(6,{\rm{Cr}}\)(VI) exists as an equilibrium mixture of\({\rm{HCrO}}_4^ - \) and orange-red dichromate,\({\rm{C}}{{\rm{r}}_2}{\rm{O}}_7^{2 - }.{\rm{Cr}}({\rm{VI}})\) is a carcinogen, but \({\rm{Cr }}(III)\)is not considered to be as harmful. The following procedure was used to measure\({\rm{Cr }}({\rm{VI}})\) in airborne particulate matter in workplaces.

1. Particles were collected by drawing a known volume of air through a polyvinyl chloride filter with \(5 - \mu {\rm{M}}\)pore size.

2. The filter was placed in a centrifuge tube and \(10\;{\rm{mL}}\)of \(0.05{\rm{M}}{\left( {{\rm{N}}{{\rm{H}}_4}} \right)_2}{\rm{S}}{{\rm{O}}_4}/0.05{\rm{MN}}{{\rm{H}}_3}buffer,{\rm{pH}}8,\) were added. The immersed filter was agitated by ultrasonic vibration for\(30\;{\rm{min}}\)at \({35^\circ }{\rm{C}}\)to extract all \({\rm{Cr }}(III)and{\rm{Cr}}\)(VI) into solution.

3. A measured volume of extract was passed through a "strongly basic" anion exchanger (Table 26-1) in the \({\rm{C}}{{\rm{l}}^ - }\)form. Then the resin was washed with distilled water. Liquid containing \({\rm{Cr}}\)(III) from the extract and the wash was discarded.

4. Cr(VI) was then eluted from the column with\(0.5{\rm{M}}{\left( {{\rm{N}}{{\rm{H}}_4}} \right)_2}{\rm{S}}{{\rm{O}}_4}/0.05{\rm{MN}}{{\rm{H}}_3}\) buffer, \({\rm{pH}}8,\)and collected in a vial.

5. The eluted \({\rm{Cr}}\)(VI) solution was acidified with \({\rm{HCl}}\)and treated with a solution of 1,5 -diphenylcarbazide, a reagent that forms a colored complex with Cr(VI). The concentration of the complex was measured by its visible absorbance.

(a) What are the dominant species of \({\rm{Cr}}\)(VI) and \({\rm{Cr}}\)(III) at\({\rm{pH}}8\)?

(b) What is the purpose of the anion exchanger in step 3 ?

(c) Why is a "strongly basic" anion exchanger used instead of a "weakly basic" exchanger?

(d) Why is Cr(VI) eluted in step 4 but not step 3 ?

If 105 particles are taken, what is the relative standard deviation of each measurement?

In an experiment analogous to that in Figure 28-3, the sampling constant is found to be \({K_{\rm{s}}} = 20\;{\rm{g}}.\)

(a) What mass of sample is required for a \( \pm 2\% \)sampling standard deviation?

(b) How many samples of the size in part (a) are required to produce \(90\% \)confidence that the mean is known to within\(1.5\% \)?

How many 2.8-g samples must be analyzed to give 95% confidence that the mean is known to within ±4%?

The following wet-ashing procedure was used to measure arsenic in organic soil samples by atomic absorption spectroscopy: A 0.1- to \({\bf{0}}.{\bf{5}} - \)g sample was heated in a \({\bf{150}} - {\bf{mL}}\) Teflon bomb in a microwave oven for \(2.5\;{\rm{min}}\) with \(3.5\;{\rm{mL}}\)of\(70\% \,\,\,{\rm{HN}}{{\rm{O}}_3}\). After the sample cooled, a mixture containing \(3.5\;{\rm{mL}}\)of \(70\% \,\,\,{\rm{HN}}{{\rm{O}}_3},1.5\;{\rm{mL}}\) of\(70\% \,\,{\rm{HCl}}{{\rm{O}}_4}\), and \(1.0\;{\rm{mL}}\) of \({{\rm{H}}_2}{\rm{S}}{{\rm{O}}_4}\)was added and the sample was reheated for three \({\bf{2}}.{\bf{5}} - {\bf{min}}\) intervals with 2 -min unheated periods in between. The final solution was diluted with \(0.2{\rm{M}}\,\,\,{\rm{HCl}}\)for analysis. Why was \({\rm{HCl}}{{\rm{O}}_4}\) not introduced until the second heating?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free