In analyzing a lot with random sample variation, you find a sampling standard deviation of \({\bf{65}}\% .\)Assuming negligible error in the analytical procedure, how many samples must be analyzed to give \(9{\bf{5}}\% \)confidence that the error in the mean is within\(64\% \)of the true value? Answer the same question for a confidence level of \(90\% \).

Short Answer

Expert verified

The samples in \(95\% \) Confidence is \(n = 6,10.3,8\) and the samples in \(90\% \) Confidence is\(n = 6,6,5.25\).

Step by step solution

01

Definition of Standard deviation.

  • The standard deviation is a measure of how far something deviates from the mean (for example, spread, dispersion, or spread). A "typical" variation from the mean is represented by the standard deviation.
  • Because it returns to the data set's original units of measurement, it's a common measure of variability.
  • The standard deviation, defined as the square root of the variance, is a statistic that represents the dispersion of a dataset relative to its mean.
02

Determine the samples in \(95\% \)confidence.

In this task we have a sampling standard deviation of \(65\% \). We will calculate the number of samples that must be analyzed in order to give \(95\% \) and \(90\% \) confidence that the error in the mean is within \( \pm 4\% \) of the true value.

\(95\% \)Confidence

Here we will use the equation \(28 - 7\) where \({s_s} = 0.05\)and \(e = 0.04\) :

\(\begin{aligned}{}n &= \frac{{{t^2}s_s^2}}{{{e^2}}}\\n &= \frac{{{{1.960}^2} \times {{0.05}^2}}}{{{{0.04}^2}}}\\n &= 6\end{aligned}\)

For \(n = 6.\) there are \({5^\circ }\) of freedom so \(t = 2.571\) which would give us the following value of \(n\) :

\(\begin{aligned}{}n &= \frac{{{t^2}s_8^2}}{{{e^2}}}\\n &= \frac{{{{2.571}^2} \times {{0.05}^2}}}{{{{0.04}^2}}}\end{aligned}\)

\(n = 10.3\)

For \(n = 10.3\) there are \({9^\circ }\) of freedom so \(t = 2.262\) which would give us the following value of \(n\) :

\(\begin{aligned}{}n& = \frac{{{t^2}s_s^2}}{{{e^2}}}\\n &= \frac{{{{2.262}^2} \times {{0.05}^2}}}{{{{0.04}^2}}}\\n &= 8\end{aligned}\)

03

Determine the samples in \(90\% \)confidence.

Find that for \(t = 2.365\) the \(n = 8.74\) so in this case we would use a total of \(8\) samples

\(90\% \)Confidence:

Here we will also use the equation 28-7 where \({s_s} = 0.05\)and \(e = 0.04\) :

\(\begin{aligned}{}n&= \frac{{{t^2}s_s^2}}{{{e^2}}}\\n &= \frac{{{{1.645}^2} \times {{0.05}^2}}}{{{{0.04}^2}}}\\n &= 6\end{aligned}\)

For \(n = 6\) there are \({5^\circ }\) of freedom so \(t = 2.015\) which would give us the following value of \(n\) :

\(\begin{aligned}{}n &= \frac{{{t^2}s_s^2}}{{{e^2}}}\\n &= \frac{{{{2.015}^2} \times {{0.05}^2}}}{{{{0.04}^2}}}\\n &= 6\end{aligned}\)

When,\(t = 1.833\)then \(n = 5.25\),so in this case we would use a total of \(6\)samples.

Therefore, the samples in \(95\% \) Confidence is \(n = 6,10.3,8\) and the samples in \(90\% \) Confidence is\(n = 6,6,5.25\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In 2002, workers at the Swedish National Food Administration discovered that heated, carbohydrate-rich foods, such as french fries, potato chips, and bread, contain alarming levels \((0.1to4\mu {\rm{g}}/{\rm{g}})\) of acrylamide, a known carcinogen\(36\).

After the discovery, simplified methods were developed to measure ppm levels of acrylamide in food. In one procedure,\(10\;{\rm{g}}\) of pulverized, frozen french fries were mixed for \(20\;{\rm{min}}\)with\(50\;{\rm{mL}}\) of \({{\rm{H}}_2}{\rm{O}}\)to extract acrylamide, which is very soluble in water \((216\;{\rm{g}}/100\;{\rm{mL}}).\)The liquid was decanted and centrifuged to remove suspended matter. The internal standard \(^2{{\rm{H}}_3}\)-acrylamide was added to\(1\;{\rm{mL}}\) of extract. A solid-phase extraction column containing \(100{\rm{mg}}\)of cation-exchange polymer with protonated sulfonic acid groups\(\left( { - {\rm{S}}{{\rm{O}}_3}{\rm{H}}} \right.)\) was washed twice with 1 -mL portions of methanol and twice with \(1 - {\rm{mL}}\)portions of water. The aqueous food extract \((1{\rm{mL}})\)was then passed through the column to bind protonated acrylamide \(\left( { - {\rm{NH}}_3^ + } \right)\)to sulfonate \(\left( { - {\rm{SO}}_3^ - } \right)on\)the column. The column was dried for\(30\;{\rm{s }}at\)\(0.3\)bar and then acrylamide was eluted with\(1\;{\rm{mL}}\) of \({{\rm{H}}_2}{\rm{O}}.\)Eluate was analyzed by liquid chromatography with a polar bonded phase. The chromatograms show the results moni- tored by ultraviolet absorbance or by mass spectrometry. The retention time of acrylamide is different on the two columns because they have different dimensions and different flow rates.

(a) What is the purpose of solid-phase extraction prior to chromatography? How does the ion-exchange sorbent retain acrylamide?

(b) Why are there many peaks when chromatography is monitored by ultraviolet absorbance?

(c) Mass spectral detection used selected reaction monitoring (Figure 22-33) with the \(m/z72 \to 55\)transition for acrylamide and \(75 \to 58fo{r^2}{{\rm{H}}_3}\)-acrylamide. Explain how this detection method works and suggest structures for the ions with \({\rm{m}}/{\rm{z}}72\)and 55 from acrylamide.

(d) Why does mass spectral detection give just one major peak?

(e) How is the internal standard used for quantitation with mass spectral detection?

(f) Where does \(^2{{\rm{H}}_3}\)-acrylamide appear with ultraviolet absorbance? With mass spectral selected reaction monitoring?

(g) Why does the mass spectral method give quantitative results even though retention of acrylamide by the ion-exchange sorbent is not quantitative and elution of acrylamide from the sorbent by \(1\;{\rm{mL}}\) of water might not be quantitative?

Chromatograms of acrylamide extract after passage through solid-phase extraction column. Left: Phenomenex Synergi Polar-RP 4- \(\mu {\rm{m}}\)column eluted with 96:4 \((vol/vol){{\rm{H}}_2}{\rm{O}}:{\rm{C}}{{\rm{H}}_3}{\rm{CN}}.\)Right: Phenomenex Synergi Hydro-RP 4- \(\mu {\rm{m}}\)column eluted with \(96:4:0.1(vol/vol/vol){{\rm{H}}_2}{\rm{O}}:{\rm{C}}{{\rm{H}}_3}{\rm{OH}}:{\rm{HC}}{{\rm{O}}_2}{\rm{H}}.\) (Data from L. Peng. T. Farkas, L. Loo, \({\rm{J}}.\)Teuscher, and \({\rm{K}}.\)Kallury, "Rapid and Reproducible Extraction of Acrylamide in French Fries Using a Single Solid-Phase Sorbent," Am. Lab. News Ed, October 2003, p. 10.)

Question: Consider a random mixture containing \(4.00\;{\rm{g}}\)of \({\rm{N}}{{\rm{a}}_2}{\rm{C}}{{\rm{O}}_3}\) (density\(2.532g/mL\)) and \(96.00\;{\rm{g}}\)of \({{\rm{K}}_2}{\rm{C}}{{\rm{O}}_3}\) (density\(2.428\;{\rm{g}}/{\rm{mL}}\)) with a uniform spherical particle radius of\(0.075\;{\rm{mm}}\).

(a) Calculate the mass of a single particle of \({\rm{N}}{{\rm{a}}_2}{\rm{C}}{{\rm{O}}_3}\) and the number of particles of \({\rm{N}}{{\rm{a}}_2}{\rm{C}}{{\rm{O}}_3}\) in the mixture. Do the same for\({{\rm{K}}_2}{\rm{C}}{{\rm{O}}_3}\).

(b) What is the expected number of particles in \(0.100\;{\rm{g}}\)of the mixture?

(c) Calculate the relative sampling standard deviation in the number of particles of each type in a \(0.100\;{\rm{g}}\)sample of the mixture.

What mass of sample in Figure 28-3 is expected to give a sampling standard deviation of \( \pm 6\% \)?

How does solid-supported liquid-liquid extraction differ from solid-phase extraction?

From their standard reduction potentials, which of the following metals would you expect to dissolve in \({\rm{HCl}}\)by the reaction\({\rm{M}} + n{{\rm{H}}^ + } \to {{\rm{M}}^{n + }} + \frac{n}{2}{{\rm{H}}_2}:{\rm{Zn}},{\rm{Fe}},{\rm{Co}},{\rm{Al}},{\rm{Hg}},{\rm{Cu}},{\rm{Pt}}\),\({\bf{Au}}\)?

(When the potential predicts that the element will not dissolve, it probably will not. If it is expected to dissolve, it may dissolve if some other process does not interfere. Predictions based on standard reduction potentials at \({\bf{2}}{{\bf{5}}^{^{\bf{o}}}}C\) are only tentative, because the potentials and activities in hot, concentrated solutions vary widely from those in the table of standard potentials.)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free