Blood plasma proteins of patients with malignant breast tumors differ from proteins of healthy people in their solubility in the presence of various polymers. When the polymers dextran and poly(ethylene glycol) are mixed with water, a two-phase mixture is formed. When plasma proteins of tumor patients are added, the distribution of proteins between the two phases is different from that of plasma proteins of a healthy person. The distribution coefficient ( K) for any substance is defined as K =[concentration of the substance in phase[concentration of the substance in phase B ]. Proteins of healthy people have a mean distribution coefficient of 0.75 with a standard deviation of 0.07. For the proteins of people with cancer, the mean is 0.92 with a standard deviation of 0.11.

(a) Suppose that Kwere used as a diagnostic tool and that a positive indication of cancer is taken asK0.92. What fraction of people with tumors would have a false negative indication of cancer becauseK0.92?

(b) What fraction of healthy people would have a false positive indication of cancer? This number is the fraction of healthy people withK0.92, shown by the shaded area in the graph below. Estimate an answer with Table 4 - 1 and obtain a more exact result with the NORMDIST function in Excel.

(c) Vary the first argument of the NORMDIST function to select a distribution coefficient that would identify 75% of people with tumors. That is, 75% of patients with tumors would have K above the selected distribution coefficient. With this value of K, what fraction of healthy people would have a false positive result indicating they have a tumor?

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) Thefraction of people with tumors is 50% .

(b) Thefraction of healthy people would have a false positive indication of cancer is 0.8% .

(c) The fraction of healthy people would have a false positive result indicating they have a tumor is 8.7% .

Step by step solution

01

Definition of fraction.

A fraction is a number that denotes a portion of something larger. There are two parts to it: a numerator and a denominator.

02

Find the fraction of people with tumors would have a false negative indication of cancer because K≥0.92 .

(a)

The distribution coefficient, K is utilised as a diagnostic tool, andK0.92 is considered a positive indicator of cancer.

Half of persons with cancer have K0.92and a false negative indication of cancer.

03

Find the fraction of healthy people would have a false positive indication of cancer.

(b)

The fraction of healthy patients withK0.92 would receive a cancer diagnosis based on a false positive result.

To estimate an answer with Table 4 - 1 , you must convert x to a z value.

z=x-μσx-x¯s=0.92-0.750.07=2.4

The area of a range determines the likelihood of measuring in that range.

Table 4 - 1 shows the area under each part of the Gaussian curve.

The area from the mean to is z = 2.4 is 0.4983 , as shown in Table 4 - 1 , ordinate and area for the normal (Gaussian) error curve.

Above z = 2.4% , the area is 0.5 - 0.4983 = 0.008 .

As a result, 0.8% of healthy patients will have a false positive cancer signal.

The table below shows the outcome of using the NORMDIST function in Excel.

04

Find the fraction of healthy people would have a false positive result indicating they have a tumor.

(c)

In cells A7 -A13 , a distribution coefficient is chosen that would indicate 75% of persons with malignancies.

The value of K yields an area of 0.25 , implying that 25% of cancer patients will go unidentified.

The number 0.84 yields a 0.2335 area, while the value 0.85 yields a 0.2623 area. However, the number K = 0.845 results in an area of 0.25 .

The area below K = 0.845 in cell B15 is 0.912632 .

1 - 0.912632 = 0.087368 is the region above K = 0.845 .

As a result, 8.7% of healthy patients would get a false positive result suggesting a malignancy.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Nitrite(NO2-)was measured by two methods in rainwater and unchlorinated drinking water. The results±standard deviation (number of samples) are

SOURCE. Data from I. Sarudi and I. Nagy, Talanta 1995,42,1099

(a) Do the two methods agree with each other at theconfidence level for both rainwater and drinking water?

(b) For each method, does the drinking water contain significantly more nitrite than the rainwater (at the 95%confidence level)?

Traces of toxic, man-made hexachlorohexanes in North Sea sediments were extracted by a known process and by two new procedures, and measured by chromatography.

(a) Is the concentration parts per million, parts per billion, or something else?

(b) Is the standard deviation for procedure B significantly different from that of the conventional procedure?

(c) Is the mean concentration found by procedure B significantly different from that of the conventional procedure?

(d) Answer the same two questions as parts (b) and (c) to compare procedure A to the conventional procedure.

What is the meaning of a confidence interval?

The equation for the Gaussian curve in Figure 4 - 1is

y=(totalbulbs)(hoursperbar)s2πe-(x-x)2/2s2

where x¯ is the mean value (845.2h) is the standard deviation (94.2h) , total bulbs = 4768, and hours per bar ( = 20) is the width of each bar in Figure 4 - 1. Set up a spreadsheet like the one with this problem to calculate the coordinates of the Gaussian curve in Figure 4 - 1 from 500to 1200hin 25 - hintervals. Note the heavy use of parentheses in the formula at the bottom of the spreadsheet to force the computer to do the arithmetic as intended. Use Excel to graph your results.

The CdSe content (g/L) of six different samples of nanocrystals was measured by two methods. Do the two methods differ significantly at the 95 % confidence level?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free