Chapter 1: 4E (page 48)
Show that
(Hint: To show an upper bound, compare with . To show a lower bound, compare it with ).
Short Answer
The statement is proved.
Chapter 1: 4E (page 48)
Show that
(Hint: To show an upper bound, compare with . To show a lower bound, compare it with ).
The statement is proved.
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for freeConsider an RSA key set with p = 17 , q = 23, N = 23 and e = 3 (as in Figure 1.9). What value of d should be used for the secret key? What is the encryption of the message M = 41 ?
Consider the problem of computing .
(a) If is an role="math" localid="1658397956489" -bit number, how many bits long is , approximately ( form)?
(b) Give an algorithm to compute and analyze its running time.
Is the difference of a multiple of ?
Wilson's theorem says that a numberis prime if and only if
.
(a) If is prime, then we know every number is invertible modulo . Which of thesenumbers is their own inverse?
(b) By pairing up multiplicative inverses, show thatrole="math" localid="1658725109805" for prime p.
(c) Show that if N is not prime, then .(Hint: Consider
(d) Unlike Fermat's Little Theorem, Wilson's theorem is an if-and-only-if condition for primality. Why can't we immediately base a primality test on this rule?
If p is prime, how many elements of have an inverse modulo ?
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.