Use the divide-and-conquer approach to write a recursive algorithm that finds the maximum sum in any contiguous sublist of a given list of \(n\) real values. Analyze your algorithm, and show the results in order notation.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The algorithm goes as follows: We first divide the array in half till we reach a base case of array of size 1. We then recursively find the maximum-sum sublists in each half and the maximum-sum sublist crossing the middle. The maximum of these values will be our answer. The time complexity for this algorithm is \(O(n \log n)\).

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the problem and the divide-and-conquer strategy

First, we need to understand the problem and how we can apply a divide-and-conquer strategy. We have a list of \(n\) real numbers, and we must find the sublist with the largest sum. Using the divide-and-conquer strategy, we can divide the problem into smaller subproblems by splitting the list in half until we have sublists of size 1, then combine the solutions to solve the larger problem.
02

Writing the algorithm

Our algorithm to implement the divide-and-conquer approach will have steps: 1. Define the base case of the recursion: a list of size 1 is its own maximum-sum sublist.2. If the list is longer, split it in half and recursively find the maximum-sum sublists in each half.3. Find the maximum-sum sublist crossing the middle (adding the maximum-sum suffix in the left half to the maximum-sum prefix in the right half).4. The maximum of the solutions to these three subproblems is the maximum-sum sublist of the entire list.
03

Analyzing the algorithm

For a list of size \(n\), each recursive call will deal with a list of approximately half the size. The maximum sum crossing the middle can be computed in linear time, thus the overall time complexity of this divide-and-conquer algorithm is \(O(n \log n)\).
04

Showing the results in order notation

The order notation of the algorithm is \(O(n \log n)\). This means that the time complexity of the algorithm grows logarithmically in relation to the size of the input list \(n\), multiplied by \(n\). It's a good performance for large data sets, compared to a naive solution that would have a complexity of \(O(n^2)\). This shows the efficiency of the divide-and-conquer approach.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Show that the recurrence equation for the worst-case time complexity for Mergesort (Algorithms \(2.2 \text { and } 2.4)\) is given by \\[ W(n)=W\left(\left[\frac{n}{2}\right\rfloor\right)+W\left(\left\lceil\frac{n}{2}\right]\right)+n-1 \\] when \(n\) is not restricted to being a power of 2

Suppose that, in a divide-and-conquer algorithm, we always divide an in stance of size \(n\) of a problem into \(n\) subinstances of size \(n / 3,\) and the dividing and combining steps take lincar time. Write a recurrence equation for the running time \(T(n),\) and solve this recurrence equation for \(T(n) .\) Show your solution in order notation.

How many multiplications would be performed in finding the product of two \(64 \times 64\) matrices using Strassen's Method (Algorithm 2.8)?

Write algorithms that perform the operations \(u \times 10^{m}\) \(u\) divide \(10^{n}\) \(u\) rem \(10 "\) where \(u\) represents a large integer, \(m\) is a nonnegative integer, divide returns the quotient in integer division, and rem returns the remainder. Analyze your algorithms, and show that these operations can be done in linear time.

Write a divide-and-conquer algorithm for the Towers of Hanoi Problem. The Towers of Hanoi Problem consists of three pegs and \(n\) disks of different sizes. The object is to move the disks that are stacked, in decreasing order of their size, on one of the three pegs to a new peg using the third one as a temporary peg. The problem should be solved according to the following rules: (1) when a disk is moved, it must be placed on one of the three pegs: (2) only one disk may be moved at a time, and it must be the top disk on one of the pegs; and (3) a larger disk may never be placed on top of a smaller disk. (a) Show for your algorithm that \(S(n)=2^{n}-1 .\) [Here \(S(n)\) denotes the number of steps (moves), given an input of \(n\) disks. (b) Prove that any other algorithm takes at least as many moves as given in part (a).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Computer Science Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free