Chapter 17: Problem 20
Why is an explicit transaction end statement needed in SQL but not an explicit begin statement?
Chapter 17: Problem 20
Why is an explicit transaction end statement needed in SQL but not an explicit begin statement?
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for freeDiscuss the different types of failures. What is meant by catastrophic failure?
Discuss the different measures of transaction equivalence. What is the difference between conflict equivalence and view equivalence?
What is the difference between the constrained write and the unconstrained write assumptions? Which is more realistic?
Consider schedules \(S_{3}, S_{4},\) and \(S_{5}\) below. Determine whether each schedule is strict, cascadeless, recoverable, or nonrecoverable. (Determine the strictest recoverability condition that each schedule satisfies.) $$\begin{array}{l} S_{3}: r_{1}(X) ; r_{2}(Z) ; r_{1}(Z) ; r_{3}(X) ; r_{3}(Y) ; w_{1}(X) ; c_{1} ; w_{3}(Y) ; c_{3} ; r_{2}(Y) ; w_{2}(Z) ; w_{2}(Y) ; c_{2} \\ S_{4}: r_{1}(X) ; r_{2}(Z) ; r_{1}(Z) ; r_{3}(X) ; r_{3}(Y) ; w_{1}(X) ; w_{3}(Y) ; r_{2}(Y) ; w_{2}(Z) ; w_{2}(Y) ; c_{1} ; c_{2} ; c_{3} \\ S_{5}: r_{1}(X) ; r_{2}(Z) ; r_{3}(X) ; r_{1}(Z) ; r_{2}(Y) ; r_{3}(Y) ; w_{1}(X) ; c_{1} ; w_{2}(Z) ; w_{3}(Y) ; w_{2}(Y) ; c_{3} ; c_{2} \end{array}$$
What is a serial schedule? What is a serializable schedule? Why is a serial schedule considered correct? Why is a serializable schedule considered correct?
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.