Chapter 6: Problem 14
When is a query language called relationally complete?
Chapter 6: Problem 14
When is a query language called relationally complete?
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for freeIn a tuple relational calculus query with \(n\) tuple variables, what would be the typical minimum number of join conditions? Why? What is the effect of having a smaller number of join conditions?
Define the following terms with respect to the domain calculus: domain variable, range relation, atom, formula, and expression.
Consider this query: Retrieve the ssns of employees who work on at least those projects on which the employee with \(\operatorname{ss} N=123456789\) works. This may be stated \(\operatorname{as}(\text { FORALL } x)(\text { IF } P \text { THEN } Q),\) where \(\bullet\) \(x\) is a tuple variable that ranges over the PROJECT relation. \(\bullet\) \(P \equiv\) employee with \(\operatorname{ssN}=123456789\) works on project \(x\) \(\bullet\) \(Q \equiv\) employee e works on project \(x\) Express the query in tuple relational calculus, using the rules \(\bullet\) \((\forall x)(P(x)) \equiv \operatorname{NOT}(\exists x)(\operatorname{NOT}(P(x)))\) \(\bullet\) (IF \(P \text { THEN } Q) \equiv(\mathrm{NOT}(P) \text { OR } Q)\)
Discuss the meanings of the existential quantifier \((\exists)\) and the universal quantifier \((\forall)\)
How does tuple relational calculus differ from domain relational calculus?
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.