Chapter 6: Problem 9
How does tuple relational calculus differ from domain relational calculus?
Chapter 6: Problem 9
How does tuple relational calculus differ from domain relational calculus?
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for freeWhen is a query language called relationally complete?
Show how you may specify the following relational algebra operations in both tuple and domain relational calculus. a. \( \sigma_{A=C}(R(A, B, C))\) b. \(\pi_{}(R(A, B, C))\) c. \(R(A, B, C) * S(C, D, E)\) d. \(R(A, B, C) \cup S(A, B, C)\) e. \(R(A, B, C) \cap S(A, B, C)\) \(f(A, B, C)-S(A, B, C)\) g. \(R(A, B, C) \times S(D, E, F)\) h. \(R(A, B) \div S(A)\)
What role does the concept of foreign key play when specifying the most common types of meaningful join operations?
Consider this query: Retrieve the ssns of employees who work on at least those projects on which the employee with \(\operatorname{ss} N=123456789\) works. This may be stated \(\operatorname{as}(\text { FORALL } x)(\text { IF } P \text { THEN } Q),\) where \(\bullet\) \(x\) is a tuple variable that ranges over the PROJECT relation. \(\bullet\) \(P \equiv\) employee with \(\operatorname{ssN}=123456789\) works on project \(x\) \(\bullet\) \(Q \equiv\) employee e works on project \(x\) Express the query in tuple relational calculus, using the rules \(\bullet\) \((\forall x)(P(x)) \equiv \operatorname{NOT}(\exists x)(\operatorname{NOT}(P(x)))\) \(\bullet\) (IF \(P \text { THEN } Q) \equiv(\mathrm{NOT}(P) \text { OR } Q)\)
What is the FUNCTION operation? What is it used for?
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.