Chapter 0: Q18P (page 1)
Show that the Post Correspondence Problem is undecidable over the binary alphabet..
Short Answer
It’s proved that Post Correspondence Problem is undecidable over .
Chapter 0: Q18P (page 1)
Show that the Post Correspondence Problem is undecidable over the binary alphabet..
It’s proved that Post Correspondence Problem is undecidable over .
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for freeFind the error in the following proof that 2 = 1. Consider the equation a = b. Multiply both sides by a to obtain a2 = ab. Subtract b2from both sides to get a2 - b2 = ab - b2. Now factor each side, (a+b) (a-b) = b (a-b),and divide each side by (a-b)to get a + b = bFinally, letequal 1, which shows that 2 = 1
Let X be the set and Y be the set .The unary function and the binary function are described in the following tables.
a. What is the value of ?
b.What are the range and domain of f?
c. What is the value of g (2, 10) ?
d. What are the range and domain ofg?
e. What is the value ofg(4, f (4))?
Let is a single-tape TM that never modifies the portion of the tape that contains the input w. Is X decidable? Prove your answer.
Let . Show that AMBIGCFG is undecidable. (Hint: Use a reduction from PCP. Given an instance
of the Post Correspondence Problem, construct a CFG Gwith the rules
where a1,...,ak are new terminal symbols. Prove that this reduction works.)
Let eitherfor some, orfor some . Show that neither Jnoris Turing-recognizable.
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.