Chapter 0: Q24P (page 1)
Let eitherfor some, orfor some . Show that neither Jnoris Turing-recognizable.
Short Answer
Both J and are not Turing Recognizable.
Chapter 0: Q24P (page 1)
Let eitherfor some, orfor some . Show that neither Jnoris Turing-recognizable.
Both J and are not Turing Recognizable.
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for freeGive a counter example to show that the following construction fails to prove that the class of context-free languages is closed under star. Let A be a CFL that is generated by the CFG . Add the new rule and call the resulting grammar. This grammar is supposed to generate A*.
We generally believe that PATH is not NP-complete. Explain the reason behind this belief. Show that proving PATH is not NP-complete would prove P ≠ NP
A queue automaton is like a push-down automaton except that the stack is replaced by a queue. A queue is a tape allowing symbols to be written only on the left-hand end and read only at the right-hand end. Each write operation (we’ll call it a push) adds a symbol to the left-hand end of the queue and each read operation (we’ll call it a pull) reads and removes a symbol at the right-hand end. As with a PDA, the input is placed on a separate read-only input tape, and the head on the input tape can move only from left to right. The input tape contains a cell with a blank symbol following the input, so that the end of the input can be detected. A queue automaton accepts its input by entering a special accept state at any time. Show that a language can be recognized by a deterministic queue automaton iff the language is Turing-recognizable.
Let
Show that ifis context free andis regular, thenis context free
In the following solitaire game, you are given an board. On each of its positions lies either a blue stone, a red stone, or nothing at all. You play by removing stones from the board until each column contains only stones of a single color and each row contains at least one stone. You win if you achieve this objective. Winning may or may not be possible, depending upon the initial configuration. Let is a winnable game configuration}. Prove that is .
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.