Let c1xn+c2xn-1+···+cnx+cn+1be a polynomial with a root atx=x0 . Let role="math" localid="1659797796589" cmaxbe the largest absolute value of a . Show that

|x0|<(n+1)cmaxc1

Short Answer

Expert verified

|x0|<(n+1)cmaxc1.This statement is proved.

Step by step solution

01

Algorithm for Polynomial.

A polynomial with a root atx=x0 and a sequence c1xn+c2xn-1+···+cnx+cn+1.and herecmax be the largest absolute value of a ciis always gives |x0|<(n+1)cmaxc1.

02

Step 2: Decidable languages is not closed under homomorphism. a).

Making the polynomial equal zero (in this case, x=x0):

c1x0n+c2xn-10+...............+cnx0+cn+1=0

Rearranging the terms:

c1x0n=-(c2x0n-1+............+cnx0+cn+1)

Taking the absolute value of both sides:

|c1x0n|   |c2x0n-1|+........+cnx0+cn+1|

Applying triangle inequality:

|c1x0n|   |c2x0n-1|+........+|cnx0|+|cn+1|

The inequality above still holds if we substitute cmaxfor all coefficients:

|c1x0n||cmax|(1+|x0|+..........+|x0n-1|)

The inequality also holds if we substitute,

nx0n1  for  (1+|x0|+..........+|x0n-1|)

|c1x0n||cmax|n|xon1|

The above result is very close to the desired result, except that it should be,

|x0|ncmaxc1

From the above result, it is true that:

|x0|<(n+1)cmaxc1, hence proved.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A Turing machine with doubly infinite tape is similar to an ordinary Turing machine, but its tape is infinite to the left as well as to the right. The tape is initially filled with blanks except for the portion that contains the input. Computation is defined as usual except that the head never encounters an end to the tape as it moves leftward. Show that this type of Turing machine recognizes the class of Turing-recognizable languages.

Give implementation-level descriptions of Turing machines that decide the following languages over the alphabet

a. {w|wcontainsanequalnumberof0sand1s}

b.{w|wcontainstwiceasmany0sas1s}

c.{w|wdoesnotcontaintwiceasmany0sas1s}

Explain why the following is not a description of a legitimate Turing machine. Mbad= “On input (p), a polynomial over variablesx1,...,xk:

1. Try all possible settings of x1,...,xk:to integer values.

2. Evaluate p on all of these settings.

3. If any of these settings evaluates to 0, accept; otherwise, reject.”

Question:A Turing machine with stay put instead of left is similar to an ordinary Turing machine, but the transition function has the form

δ:Q×Γ-Q×Γ×{R,S}.

At each point, the machine can move its head right or let it stay in the same position. Show that this Turing machine variant is not equivalent to the usual version. What class of languages do these machines recognize?

Examine the formal definition of a Turing machine to answer the following questions, and explain your reasoning.

a. Can a Turing machine ever write the blank symbol on its tape?

b. Can the tape alphabetΓbe the same as the input alphabet?

c. Can a Turing machine’s head ever be in the same location in two successive steps?

d. Can a Turing machine contain just a single state?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Computer Science Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free