Chapter 7: Q8E (page 323)
Let Analyse the algorithm given on page 185 to show that this language is in .
Short Answer
The nodes are marked in all lines differently with marked, which can necessary so much time to scanned from the list of
Chapter 7: Q8E (page 323)
Let Analyse the algorithm given on page 185 to show that this language is in .
The nodes are marked in all lines differently with marked, which can necessary so much time to scanned from the list of
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for freeFor a cnf-formula with variables and clauses , show that you can construct in polynomial time an NFA with states that accept all nonsatisfying assignments, represented as Boolean strings of length . Conclude that implies that NFAs cannot be minimized in polynomial time.
Show that is closed under union and concatenation.
A cut in an undirected graph is a separation of the vertices V into two disjoint subsets S and T . The size of a cut is the number of edges that have one endpoint in S and the other in T . Let
Show that MAX-CUT is NP-complete. You may assume the result of Problem 7.26. (Hint: Show that. The variable gadget for variable x is a collection of 3c nodes labeled with x and another nodes labeled with x . The clause gadget is a triangle of three edges connecting three nodes labeled with the literals appearing in the clause. Do not use the same node in more than one clause gadget. Prove that this reduction works.)
Call graphs isomorphic if the nodes of may be reordered so that it is identical to .
Let Show that .
Let ? be a 3cnf-formula. An ≠-assignment to the variables of ? is one where each clause contains two literals with unequal truth values. In other words, an ≠ -assignment satisfies ? without assigning three true literals in any clause.
a. Show that the negation of any ≠ -assignment to ? is also an ≠ -assignment.
b. Let ≠ SAT be the collection of 3cnf-formulas that have an ≠ -assignment. Show that we obtain a polynomial time reduction from 3SAT to ≠ SAT by replacing each clause ci
$$
with the two clauses
Where is a new variable for each clause, and b is a single additional new variable.
c. Conclude that -complete.
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.