Log out Go to App
Go to App

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 12: Problem 7

Suppose you use executable assertions to improve testability. Make a case for, and then a case against, allowing the assertions to run in the production system as opposed to removing them after testing.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Assertions in production catch unforeseen errors, improving reliability. However, they may degrade performance and expose sensitive information.

Step by step solution

01

Define Executable Assertions

Executable assertions are statements in the code that check if certain conditions are true during runtime. They help identify and diagnose problems by ensuring that the code behaves as expected.
02

Case For Allowing Assertions in Production

Assertions in production can catch unforeseen errors that were not detected during testing. This improves reliability by ensuring that bugs are caught and addressed before they cause significant issues.
03

Case Against Allowing Assertions in Production

Assertions can degrade performance and may expose sensitive information if an assertion fails. Removing them after testing can optimize efficiency and protect the system from revealing internal logic or vulnerabilities.
04

Weighing Both Sides

The decision to keep or remove assertions in production should weigh the benefits of catching errors against the potential performance costs and security risks. Consider the context and criticality of the application.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Start your free trial

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Testability in Software
Testability in software refers to how easily and effectively a software system can be tested. Executable assertions are a powerful tool to enhance testability, as they check specific conditions during runtime automatically.
This means you can detect issues early, often as soon as they arise. There are two key advantages:
  • Immediate feedback on code behavior
  • Facilitation of automated testing
With higher testability, you spend less time debugging and more time developing new features.
Runtime Error Detection
Runtime error detection involves identifying errors while the code is executing. Using executable assertions is a practical way to achieve this. They enforce specific conditions and raise alerts when these conditions are not met. Br> For instance, an assertion might verify that variable values remain within a valid range. This runtime check can help track down hard-to-find bugs.
The benefits include:
  • Early error identification
  • Prevention of cascading failures
However, one must consider the potential trade-offs in system performance and security.
Production System Performance
Performance in a production system is crucial, as it affects user experience and system efficiency. Executable assertions can play a dual role. During development, they help catch bugs early, improving long-term performance.
However, running assertions in a live production environment can slow down the system because of the additional checks being performed. Each assertion adds overhead, which, while minimal in testing, can accumulate significantly in a production setting.
Consider removing or limiting assertions in production to balance error detection and system performance.
Software Reliability
Software reliability is the probability that a software system will function correctly under specified conditions. Executable assertions enhance reliability by verifying that the software meets predefined conditions during execution.
They serve as a safety net, catching errors that might evade standard testing. This leads to more robust and dependable software.
To maximize reliability:
  • Incorporate multiple layers of error checking
  • Use assertions wisely to debug unforeseen issues
However, avoid excessive use in production to maintain optimal performance.
Software Security
In the context of software security, executable assertions can be a double-edged sword. While they help identify coding errors that could lead to security vulnerabilities, they also pose certain risks.
If an assertion fails, it might reveal internal system logic or sensitive information. This could be exploited by malicious actors to compromise the system.
To secure your software:
  • Use assertions during testing stages
  • Hide or sanitize any information that could be exposed if an assertion fails
Always weigh the security benefits against the potential exposure risks.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A testable system is one that gives up its faults easily. That is, if a system contains a fault, then it doesn't take long or much effort to make that fault show up. In contrast, fault tolerance is all about designing systems that jealously hide their faults; there, the whole idea is to make it very difficult for a system to reveal its faults. Is it possible to design a system that is both highly testable and highly fault tolerant, or are these two design goals inherently incompatible? Discuss.
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Computer Science Textbooks

Theory of Computation

Read Explanation

Computer Systems

Read Explanation

Problem Solving Techniques

Read Explanation

Issues in Computer Science

Read Explanation

Algorithms in Computer Science

Read Explanation

Computer Network

Read Explanation
View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free