Log out Go to App
Go to App

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 1: Problem 13

What is the difference between "caveat emptor" and "ceteris paribus"

Short Answer

Expert verified
The difference between "caveat emptor" and "ceteris paribus" lies in their contexts and usages. Caveat emptor, meaning "let the buyer beware," is a principle in commerce and business, emphasizing the buyer's responsibility to conduct thorough research before making a purchase. In contrast, ceteris paribus, meaning "all other things being equal," is an analytical tool used in economics and social sciences to understand the relationship between two variables while keeping other factors constant.

Step by step solution

01

Define Caveat Emptor

Caveat emptor is a Latin term that translates to "let the buyer beware." It is a principle in the world of commerce and business that puts the responsibility on the buyer to conduct due diligence before making a purchase. The seller is not obliged to disclose any defects or issues with the product or service, and once the transaction is completed, the buyer can't hold the seller responsible for any problems that arise. Step 2:
02

Define Ceteris Paribus

Ceteris paribus is another Latin term, which translates to "all other things being equal" or "other things held constant." This term is primarily used in economics and other social sciences to analyze the effect of one variable on another while keeping all other variables constant. This simplification helps isolate the relationship between two variables without accounting for potential confounding factors. Step 3:
03

Highlight the difference between the two terms

The key difference between "caveat emptor" and "ceteris paribus" lies in their respective contexts and usages. Caveat emptor is a principle in commerce and business, emphasizing the buyer's responsibility to conduct thorough research before making a purchase. On the other hand, ceteris paribus is an analytical tool used in economics and social sciences to understand the relationship between two variables while keeping other factors constant.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Start your free trial

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Distinguish between consumer goods and capital goods. Is it possible for one good to be both a consumer and a capital good? Give an example.

Explain the "other things equal", or ceteris paribus assumption of economic analysis.

A small country, Ruritania, produces only two goods, shoes and soybeans. Its economic resources are limited, so any factors of production (land, labor or capital) which are added to shoe production must be taken from soybean production, and vice versa. Consequently, to produce more of one good it must be willing to produce less of another. The table below shows various combinations of maximum quantities of shoes and soybeans which Ruritania can produce. Using the data in the table, construct a production-possibility curve for Ruritania.

One of the reasons Adam Smith supported the Free Market was because he believed that what is good for the individual is good for the country. So, since everyone would like to choose what they want to buy, it must be good for the country to give everyone free choice. Identify the error in Smith's logic and give a counter example.

What are the three fundamental problems of any society"
See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free