Chapter 25: Problem 880
Even if the United States is at a comparative disadvantage in agriculture, why might it still be more efficient for the United States to specialize in agricultural production?
Chapter 25: Problem 880
Even if the United States is at a comparative disadvantage in agriculture, why might it still be more efficient for the United States to specialize in agricultural production?
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for freeIf every country in the world has the exact same opportunity costs, so that no nation has a comparative advantage in any line of production, could there still be a basis for trade?
If the United States could produce five automobiles instead of one ton of food (that is, the opportunity cost of producing one ton of food is five automobiles) and maximum food production is five million tons, then the maximum automobile production is twenty-five million. Given that on the international market ten automobiles can be exchanged for one ton of food, compare the production possibilities frontier with the trading possibilities frontier.
In a frictionless world economy, resources would be perfectly mobile. As it is now, immigration, emigration and capital outflow restrictions severely limit resource mobility. How do the changes in supply and demand, and the consequent price changes, brought about by application of comparative advantage, tend to compensate for the immobility of resources.
Relate the principle of comparative advantage to the concept of opportunity cost.
If American agriculture is the most efficient in the world, could the United States still import food?
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.