Chapter 29: Problem 984

Malthus used diminishing returns to predict an end to growth and possible disaster. The Club of Rome has also predicted an end to growth and almost certain disaster. What basis does this group have for its predictions?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Both Malthus and the Club of Rome predicted an end to growth and possible disaster based on the principles of diminishing returns and resource limitations. Malthus focused on food production and population growth, arguing that population growth would eventually surpass food production capacity due to diminishing returns in agricultural productivity. The Club of Rome took a broader view, considering factors like industrialization, pollution, and overall resource depletion, and argued that continued growth was unsustainable in a world with finite resources. Both predictions underscore the need for a reevaluation of our current patterns of consumption and resource management.

Step by step solution

Understanding Malthus' Theory

Malthus, an 18th-century economist, proposed a theory suggesting that global population growth would surpass food production capacity, leading to disaster. His theory was primarily built on the principle of diminishing returns – as more labor input is used in agriculture, the incremental increase in production declines over time. This theory implied an inevitable end to 'growth' as population eventually surpassed food production, causing starvation and high mortality rates.

Understanding the Club of Rome's Predictions

The Club of Rome, a global think tank, predicted a similar end to growth in the 1970s. Their prediction was based on the idea that the Earth has limited resources, and the rapid rate of industrial growth was unsustainable. They suggested that if growth trends of population, industrialization, pollution, food production, and resource depletion continued unchanged, the limits to growth on Earth would be reached within the next century. In short, their prediction of disaster was based on the perceived impossibility of endless growth in a world of finite resources.

Drawing Comparisons

Both Malthus and the Club of Rome predicted an end to growth and potential disaster due to similar factors – diminishing returns and resource limitations. Malthus focused more on food production and population growth, while the Club of Rome considered wider factors, such as general resource depletion and industrial expansion. However, they both essentially supported the same principle – the unsustainable nature of perpetual growth in a finite system.

Taking a comprehensive view

In order to fully comprehend the basis of these groups' predictions, it's important to understand that these theories reflect a perspective that prioritizes the limits and potential depletion of resources as central factors influencing future growth. This perspective raises significant questions about the sustainability of our current patterns of consumption and growth, encouraging a reassessment of how we use and manage resources.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

Full Textbook Solutions
Get detailed explanations and key concepts
Unlimited Al creation
Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...
Ads-free access
To over 500 millions flashcards
Money-back guarantee
We refund you if you fail your exam.

Start your free trial

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!