Gadgets for Sale \(\ldots\) or Not How come the prices of some gadgets, like the iPod, are the same no matter where you shop? No, the answer isn't that Apple illegally manages prices. In reality, Apple uses an accepted retail strategy called minimum advertised price to discourage resellers from discounting. The minimum advertised price \((\mathrm{MAP})\) is the absolute lowest price of a product that resellers can advertise. Marketing subsidies offered by a manufacturer to its resellers usually keep the price at or above the MAP. Stable prices are important to the company that is both a manufacturer and a retailer. If Apple resellers advertised the iPod below cost. they could squeeze the Apple Stores out of their own markets. The downside to the price stability is that by limiting how low sellers can go, MAP keeps prices artificially high (or at least higher than they might otherwise be with unfettered price competition). Source: Slate, December 22, 2006 Why might the MAP strategy be against the social interest and benefit only the producer?

Short Answer

Expert verified
MAP keeps prices high, benefiting producers and maintaining profit margins but is against social interest as it reduces competition and forces consumers to pay more.

Step by step solution

01

- Understanding Minimum Advertised Price (MAP)

The Minimum Advertised Price (MAP) is a legal agreement between manufacturers and retailers where the manufacturer sets the lowest price at which the product can be advertised. This ensures that no retailer advertises the product below this set minimum price.
02

- Producer Benefits from MAP

MAP helps producers like Apple guarantee that their products are sold at prices that sustain both their brand image and profitability. It prevents price wars among retailers, which could damage the brand's perceived value and reduce profit margins.
03

- Impact on Competition

MAP strategy limits how low sellers can go on pricing. This hinders unfettered price competition among different retailers, as they cannot advertise prices below the MAP, maintaining higher prices overall.
04

- Social Interest Impact

From a social perspective, the MAP strategy can be seen as being against the social interest because it keeps prices higher than they might be in a competitive market without MAP restrictions. Consumers end up paying more for the product, reducing their consumer surplus.
05

- Who Benefits?

The primary beneficiaries of the MAP strategy are the producers and perhaps retailers who can maintain higher profit margins. Consumers, on the other hand, do not benefit because they are forced to pay higher prices due to reduced competition.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Price Stabilization
Price stabilization is one of the main goals behind implementing a Minimum Advertised Price (MAP) strategy. By establishing a minimum price, manufacturers like Apple ensure consistency across various retailers. This means that whether you visit an Apple store or a third-party retailer, the price of an iPod remains the same.

Stable pricing helps build and maintain the brand's value. When customers see a product consistently priced, it reinforces the perception of quality and reliability.

Another reason for price stabilization is to protect brick-and-mortar stores. If online retailers could advertise significantly lower prices, physical stores would struggle to compete and might eventually close down due to reduced sales.

While price stability is beneficial for maintaining brand value, it can have downsides, particularly for the consumers who might miss out on potential discounts. Ultimately, the motivation for price stabilization primarily revolves around sustaining profitability and market presence.
Market Competition
Market competition is affected by the implementation of the MAP strategy. Normally, in a free-market environment, different retailers would compete by offering varying discounts on products. This competition would drive prices down, benefiting consumers.

Under the MAP agreement, however, retailers cannot advertise prices below the specified minimum. This limits competitive pricing strategies and, essentially, places a floor on how low prices can go.

By imposing MAP, businesses attempt to prevent price wars. While price wars can benefit consumers in the short term by lowering prices, they often hurt retailers’ profit margins and can lead to a race to the bottom. For small businesses or new entrants not able to sustain such aggressive pricing tactics, MAP can act as a protective barrier.

On the flip side, reduced price competition means that consumers are less likely to find great deals, potentially limiting consumer choice and enabling manufacturers to maintain higher prices consistently.
Consumer Surplus
Consumer surplus is an economic concept that measures the difference between what consumers are willing to pay and what they actually pay. In a perfectly competitive market, the abundance of sellers drives prices down, increasing the consumer surplus.

However, the MAP strategy impacts consumer surplus by keeping prices higher than they might otherwise be in a market with unfettered price competition. Since retailers can't advertise prices below the MAP, consumers end up paying more for the same product, essentially reducing their consumer surplus.

While some argue that higher prices are justified by the perceived value of the brand and the quality of the product, the reality is that consumers miss out on potential savings.

It's a trade-off between brand value and affordability—the manufacturer and retailers maintain profit margins, but at the cost of greater financial outlay for consumers.
Profit Margins
Profit margins are crucial for the sustainability of any business. For manufacturers like Apple, maintaining higher prices via MAP agreements directly translates to healthier profit margins.

By ensuring that products are not advertised below a certain price, manufacturers protect their own financial interests and that of their retailers. It avoids a situation where intense price competition could erode profits to unsustainable levels.

Retailers also benefit from MAP because it sets a predictable profit margin on the products they sell. This stability makes it easier for them to plan their finances and implement long-term strategies.

Yet, the flip side is that while the business enjoys robust profit margins, consumers face higher prices. This dichotomy highlights the balance between ensuring business profitability and fostering consumer satisfaction.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Use the following news clip to work. Bud and Wise are the only two producers of aniseed beer, a New Age product designed to displace root beer. Bud and Wise are trying to figure out how much of this new beer to produce. They know (i) If they both produce 10,000 gallons a day, they will make the maximum attainable joint economic profit of \(\$ 200,000\) a day, or \(\$ 100,000\) a day each. (ii) If either firm produces 20,000 gallons a day while the other produces 10,000 gallons a day, the one that produces 20,000 gallons will make an economic profit of \(\$ 150,000\) and the other will incur an economic loss of \(\$ 50,000\). (iii) If both produce 20,000 gallons a day, each firm will make zero economic profit. Find the Nash equilibrium of the game that Bud and Wise play.

In the 1990 s, Reliance spent \(\$ 6\) billion to build a world-class oil refinery at Jamnagar, India. Now Reliance's expansion will make it the world's biggest producer of gasoline- 1.2 million gallons per day, or about \(5 \%\) of global capacity. Reliance plans to sell the gasoline in the United States and Europe where it's too expensive and politically difficult to build new refineries. The bulked-up Jamnagar will be able to move the market and singapore traders expect a drop in fuel prices as soon as it's going at full steam. Source: Fortune, April 28, 2008 a. Explain why the news clip implies that the gasoline market is not perfectly competitive. b. What barriers to entry might limit competition and allow Reliance to influence the price?

The Asian rice-exporting nations planned to discuss a proposal that they form a cartel. Ahead of the meeting, the countries said that the purpose of the rice cartel would be to contribute to ensuring food stability, not just in an individual country but also to address food shortages in the region and the world. The cartel will not hoard rice and raise prices when there are shortages. The Philippines says that it is a bad idea. It will create an oligopoly, and the cartel could price the grain out of reach for millions of people. Source: CNN, May 6,2008 a. Assuming the rice-exporting nations become a profit-maximizing colluding oligopoly, explain how they would influence the global market for rice and the world price of rice. b. Assuming the rice-exporting nations become a profit-maximizing colluding oligopoly, draw a graph to illustrate their influence on the global market for rice. c. Even in the absence of international antitrust laws, why might it be difficult for this cartel to successfully collude? Use the ideas of game theory to explain.

New Entrants Pose a Challenge to Boeing's Share of the Global Commercial Airplane Market Competition is going to get tougher for Boeing. Currently, the global commercial airplane market for airplanes with a seating capacity of over 100 passengers is lead by Boeing and Airbus. Last year, Boeing with 648 commercial airplane deliveries occupied 43 percent of this market. Airbus with 626 commercial airplane deliveries stood second. Source: Forbes, March 06,2014 a. According to Reuters, the market share of Boeing in the large commercial aircraft segment was above 75 percent before 1990 Describe how the structure of the airplane market has changed over the past few decades. b. If Boeing and Airbus formed a cartel, how would the price charged for airplanes and the profits made change?

Why do Coca-Cola and PepsiCo spend huge amounts on advertising? Do they benefit? Does the consumer benefit? Explain your answer by constructing a game to illustrate the choices Coca-Cola and PepsiCo make.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free