According to BEA, in the U.S., real personal consumption expenditure (PCE) was \(\$ 10,811.4\) billion and nominal PCE was \(\$ 11,653.3\) billion in the fourth quarter of \(2013 .\) The PCE deflator was 108.9 and real \(\mathrm{PCE}\) was \(\$ 11,119.6\) billion in the fourth quarter of 2014 Calculate the PCE deflator in 2013 and the percentage change in real \(P C E\) and nominal PCE.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The PCE deflator for 2013 is approximately 107.8. The percentage change in real PCE is approximately 2.85%, while the nominal PCE did not change.

Step by step solution

01

- Calculate the PCE Deflator for 2013

The formula to find the PCE deflator is: \[ \text{PCE deflator} = \left( \frac{\text{Nominal PCE}}{\text{Real PCE}} \right) \times 100 \] Plugging in the values for 2013: \[ \text{PCE deflator}_{2013} = \left( \frac{11,653.3}{10,811.4} \right) \times 100 \approx 107.8 \]
02

- Calculate the Percentage Change in Real PCE

The formula for the percentage change is: \[ \text{Percentage change} = \left( \frac{\text{New Value} - \text{Old Value}}{\text{Old Value}} \right) \times 100 \] Here, the New Value is the Real PCE in 2014, and the Old Value is the Real PCE in 2013: \[ \text{Percentage change in Real PCE} = \left( \frac{11,119.6 - 10,811.4}{10,811.4} \right) \times 100 \approx 2.85\% \]
03

- Calculate the Percentage Change in Nominal PCE

Using the same percentage change formula, but this time with Nominal PCE: \[ \text{Percentage change in Nominal PCE} = \left( \frac{11,653.3 - 11,653.3}{11,653.3} \right) \times 100 = 0\% \] Since there's no change in nominal PCE between the periods given, the result is 0%.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

PCE deflator
The PCE deflator is a crucial concept in understanding inflation in personal consumption. It measures the changes in the price level of all final goods and services consumed by individuals.

A higher PCE deflator indicates that the general price level has increased, which often means inflation. Conversely, a lower PCE deflator signals a decrease in the general price level, often associated with deflation.

To calculate the PCE deflator, we use the formula: \[ \text{PCE deflator} = \frac{\text{Nominal PCE}}{\text{Real PCE}} \times 100 \] Here, nominal PCE is the current dollar value of goods and services, while real PCE is the dollar value adjusted for inflation. This ratio helps us understand the impact of changing prices on total expenditure. For the year 2013, with nominal PCE at \$11,653.3 \ billion and real PCE at \$10,811.4 \ billion, the PCE deflator is: \[ \text{PCE deflator}_{2013} = \frac{11,653.3}{10,811.4} \times 100 \approx 107.8 \] This indicates a slight inflation in 2013 because the price level increased by about 7.8% compared to the base year.
Real PCE
Real Personal Consumption Expenditure (PCE) measures the dollar value of goods and services purchased by households, adjusted for inflation. It is a more accurate reflection of the purchasing power of consumers, as it eliminates the effect of price changes over time.

To understand real PCE, think of it as taking the nominal PCE value and removing the inflation component to see the true change in consumption. For example, if we have a real PCE of \$10,811.4 \ billion in 2013 and \$11,119.6 \ billion in 2014, this shows an actual increase in consumption volumes from one year to the next.

The percentage change in real PCE helps capture this growth accurately: \[ \text{Percentage change in Real PCE} = \frac{11,119.6 - 10,811.4}{10,811.4} \times 100 \approx 2.85\text{\text{\text{\text{\text{\text{\textindle}}}}}} \] An increase of 2.85% shows consumers were able to purchase more in 2014, adjusting for inflation.
Nominal PCE
Nominal Personal Consumption Expenditure (PCE) reflects the total current dollar value of goods and services consumed by households within a period, unadjusted for inflation. It gives an immediate snapshot of consumer spending but doesn't account for price changes over time.

For example, the nominal PCE in 2013 was \$11,653.3 \ billion, representing the total expenditure at the prices prevailing at that time. However, this does not adjust for inflation, meaning it includes the effect of changing prices.

Comparing nominal PCE across periods can be misleading if inflation is not considered, as it may suggest increased spending when in reality, price levels might have risen. For instance, if nominal PCE remains constant, it can indicate no actual increase in consumption. In the exercise, the percentage change in nominal PCE from 2013 to 2014 is zero: \[ \text{Percentage change in Nominal PCE} = \frac{11,653.3 - 11,653.3}{11,653.3} \times 100 \ = 0\text{\text{\text{\text{\text{\text{\textindle}}}}}} \] indicating no change in total expenditure values without inflation adjustment.
Percentage change calculation
Understanding how to calculate the percentage change is critical for analyzing changes over time in economic indicators like PCE.

The formula to calculate percentage change is straightforward: \[ \text{Percentage change} = \frac{\text{New Value} - \text{Old Value}}{\text{Old Value}} \times 100 \] This formula shows how much one value has increased or decreased in percentage terms from another value.

Let's apply it to real PCE: given that the real PCE increased from \$10,811.4 \ billion in 2013 to \$11,119.6 \ billion in 2014, we calculate it as: \[ \text{Percentage change in Real PCE} = \frac{11,119.6 - 10,811.4}{10,811.4} \times 100 \approx 2.85\text{\text{\text{\text{\text{\text{\textindle}}}}}} \] This shows a 2.85% growth in real purchases by households, indicating healthier economic activity.

Similarly, for nominal PCE which hasn't changed: \[ \text{Percentage change in Nominal PCE} = \frac{11,653.3 - 11,653.3}{11,653.3} \times 100 \ = 0\text{\text{\text{\text{\text{\text{\textindle}}}}}} \] showing no change in consumption nominally. This emphasizes the importance of considering both real and nominal values for a clear economic insight.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Use the following data to work Problems 8 and 9 The people on Coral Island buy only juice and cloth. The CPI basket contains the quantities bought in \(2013 .\) The average household spent \(\$ 60\) on juice and \(\$ 30\) on cloth in 2013 when juice was \(\$ 2\) a bottle and cloth was \(\$ 5\) a yard. In 2014 , juice is \(\$ 4\) a bottle and cloth is \(\$ 6\) a yard. Calculate the CPI and the inflation rate in 2014

The overall unemployment rate in Lebanon stands at 24 percent, and youth unemployment exceeds 35 percent. In the face of job crisis, Lebanon should introduce reforms in the education system to adapt to future labor market needs. At the same time, it is crucial to develop a viable information and communications technology sector and to speed up the process of finalizing the oil and gas exploration and production projects. Also essential to job creation are small- and medium-size enterprises. a. On the basis of the news clip, what is the main type of unemployment that Lebanon should use policies to control? Explain. b. How might these policies impact Lebanon's natural unemployment rate? Explain.

Amazon.com agreed to pay its workers \(\$ 20\) an hour in 1999 and \(\$ 22\) an hour in \(2001 .\) The price level for these years was 166 in 1999 and 180 in \(2001 .\) Calculate the real wage rate in each year. Did these workers really get a pay raise between 1999 and \(2001 ?\)

Matching people with available jobs is always difficult after a recession as the economy remakes itself, but the disconnect is particularly acute this time. since the recovery began in mid- 2009 , the number of job openings has risen more than twice as fast as actual hires. If the job market were working normally, openings would be getting filled as they appear. Some 5 million more would be employed and the unemployment rate would be \(6.8 \%\), instead of \(9.5 \%\) Are the 5 million workers who cannot find jobs because of mismatching in the labor market counted as part of the economy's structural unemployment or part of cyclical unemployment?

The unemployment rate among older Greek males is about twice the Eurozone average. These men were often families' sole bread winners. Now, strained by the financial woes, their wives have to take jobs outside the home. In Greece, with its macho, traditional culture, this could mean shame and depression for men. They have mortgage arrears, children to put through college and bills to pay. But for a few days' work at a factory, they have to sometimes travel across the country. a. What type of unemployment might older workers be more prone to experience than younger workers? b. Explain how the unemployment rate of older workers could be influenced by the business cycle. c. Why might older unemployed workers become marginally attached or discouraged workers during a recession?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free