Fishing for sablefish has been so intensive that sablefish were threatened with extinction. After several years of banning such fishing, the government is now proposing to introduce tradable vouchers, each of which entitles its holder to a catch of a certain size. Explain how uncontrolled fishing generates a negative externality and how the voucher scheme may overcome the inefficiency created by this externality.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Question: Explain how the introduction of tradable vouchers for sablefish fishing can help address the negative externality caused by uncontrolled fishing activities and overcome the inefficiency it creates. Answer: Tradable vouchers for sablefish fishing can help address the negative externality caused by uncontrolled fishing activities by putting a limit on the total amount of sablefish that can be caught. This brings the fishing activity closer to the socially optimal level and accounts for the negative externality caused by overfishing. The vouchers also allow fishermen to trade among themselves, leading to an efficient allocation of resources and balancing the demand and supply for the right to fish. This helps overcome the inefficiency created by the negative externality and contributes to the sustainable management of sablefish populations.

Step by step solution

01

Define Negative Externality

Negative externality occurs when the production or consumption of a good causes a harmful effect on third parties who are not directly involved in the production or consumption of that good. In this case, the negative externality is caused by uncontrolled fishing of sablefish, which led to the threat of extinction. The third parties affected could be other marine life species, fishermen in the future, and consumers who rely on sablefish as a source of food.
02

Explain the Inefficiency Created by Negative Externality

The inefficiency created by the negative externality is that too many resources are used in fishing, leading to exceeding the sustainable fishing rate. In the absence of regulations, fishermen will not consider the long-term effects of their actions on the fish population and the ecosystem. As a result, the market equilibrium occurs at a higher quantity of fish caught than the socially optimal level, causing an inefficiency and potential depletion of the sablefish population.
03

Introduce Tradable Vouchers

The government proposes to introduce tradable vouchers, where each voucher entitles its holder to catch a certain size of sablefish. This creates a market for the right to fish, allowing the market forces to regulate the fishing activities.
04

Explain How Tradable Vouchers Overcome Inefficiency

Through the voucher scheme, the government sets a limit on the total amount of sablefish that can be caught. This will bring the fishing activity closer to the socially optimal level, as it accounts for the negative externality caused by overfishing. Fishermen can also trade these vouchers among themselves, allowing those who value the sablefish more to purchase additional vouchers from those who value them less. This leads to an efficient allocation of resources, as the market for tradable vouchers balances the demand and supply for the right to fish. In conclusion, introducing tradable vouchers for sablefish fishing helps to address the negative externality caused by uncontrolled fishing activities. The vouchers limit the total quantity of sablefish caught and allow for efficient allocation of fishing rights through market forces. As a result, the voucher scheme may overcome the inefficiency created by the negative externality and ultimately contribute to the sustainable management of sablefish populations.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

What type of externality (positive or negative) is present in each of the following examples? Is the marginal social benefit of the activity greater than or equal to the marginal benefit to the individual? Is the marginal social cost of the activity greater than or equal to the marginal cost to the individual? Without intervention, will there be too little or too much (relative to what would be socially optimal) of this activity? a. Mr. Chau plants lots of colorful flowers in his front yard. b. Your next-door neighbor likes to build bonfires in his backyard, and sparks often drift onto your house. c. Maija, who lives next to an apple orchard, decides to keep bees to produce honey. d. Justine buys a large SUV that consumes a lot of gasoline.

The city of Falls Church, Virginia, subsidizes the planting of trees in homeowners' front yards when they are within 15 feet of the street. a. Using concepts in the chapter, explain why a municipality would subsidize planting trees on private property, but near the street. b. Draw a diagram similar to Figure \(16-4\) that shows the marginal social benefit, the marginal social cost, and the optimal Pigouvian subsidy on planting trees.

Many dairy farmers in California are adopting a new technology that allows them to produce their own electricity from methane gas captured from animal waste. (One cow can produce up to 2 kilowatts a day.) This practice reduces the amount of methane gas released into the atmosphere. In addition to reducing their own utility bills, the farmers are allowed to sell any electricity they produce at favorable rates. a. Explain how the ability to earn money from capturing and transforming methane gas behaves like a Pigouvian tax on methane gas pollution and can lead dairy farmers to emit the efficient amount of methane gas pollution. b. Suppose some dairy farmers have lower costs of transforming methane into electricity than others. Explain how this system of capturing and selling methane gas leads to an efficient allocation of emissions reduction among farmers.

a. EAuction and EMarketplace are two competing internet auction sites, where buyers and sellers transact goods. Each auction site earns money by charging sellers for listing their goods. EAuction has decided to eliminate fees for the first transaction for sellers that are new to its site. Explain why this is likely to be a good strategy for EAuction in its competition with EMarketplace. b. EMarketplace complained to the Justice Department that EAuction's practice of eliminating fees for new sellers was anti-competitive and would lead to monopolization of the internet auction industry. Is EMarketplace correct? How should the Justice Department respond? c. EAuction stopped its practice of eliminating fees for new sellers. But since it provided much better technical service than its rival, EMarketplace, buyers and sellers came to prefer EAuction. Eventually, EMarketplace closed down, leaving EAuction as a monopolist. Should the Justice Department intervene to break EAuction into two companies? Explain. d. EAuction is now a monopolist in the internet auction industry. It also owns a site that handles payments over the internet, called PayForIt. It is competing with another internet payment site, called PayBuddy. EAuction has now stipulated that any transaction on its auction site must use PayForIt, rather than PayBuddy, for the payment. Should the Justice Department intervene? Explain.

According to a report from the U.S. Census Bureau, "the average [lifetime] earnings of a full-time, year round worker with a high school education are about \(\$ 1.2\) million compared with \(\$ 2.1\) million for a college graduate." This indicates that there is a considerable benefit to a graduate from investing in his or her own education. Tuition at most state universities covers only about two-thirds to three-quarters of the cost, so the state applies a Pigouvian subsidy to college education. If a Pigouvian subsidy is appropriate, is the externality created by a college education a positive or a negative externality? What does this imply about the differences between the costs and benefits to students compared to social costs and benefits? What are some reasons for the differences?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free