An economist gives the following advice to a museum director: "You should introduce 'peak pricing.' At times when the museum has few visitors, you should admit visitors for free. And at times when the museum has many visitors, you should charge a higher admission fee." a. When the museum is quiet, is it rival or nonrival in consumption? Is it excludable or nonexcludable? What type of good is the museum at those times? What would be the efficient price to charge visitors during that time, and why? b. When the museum is busy, is it rival or nonrival in consumption? Is it excludable or nonexcludable? What type of good is the museum at those times? What would be the efficient price to charge visitors during that time, and why?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: During quiet times, the efficient price to charge is zero or a low price because the museum is nonrival in consumption and can accommodate more visitors without affecting the quality of the experience for others. During busy times, the efficient price to charge is a higher fee, as the museum becomes rival in consumption due to overcrowding, and the higher price helps regulate the number of visitors, ensuring a better experience for those willing to pay the higher price.

Step by step solution

01

A rival good is a good that cannot be enjoyed by one person without preventing someone else from enjoying it. A nonrival good is a good that can be enjoyed by many people simultaneously, without impeding each other's consumption. This is important in determining how the museum should be priced, as different pricing strategies are relevant for different types of goods. #Step 2: Understanding Excludable and Nonexcludable Goods#

An excludable good is a good that someone can be prevented from enjoying it if they don't pay for it, while a nonexcludable good is one that cannot be restricted from someone's consumption, regardless of whether they pay for it or not. This distinction is also vital in determining the appropriate pricing strategy for the museum. #Step 3: Analyzing the Quiet Museum Scenario#
02

a. When the museum is quiet#

During quiet times, the museum is nonrival in consumption since the low number of visitors doesn't interfere with each other's experience. It remains excludable, as the museum can still control access to its exhibits. At this point, the museum can be considered a club good. The efficient price to charge during quiet times is zero or a low price, as this encourages visitors to enter and enjoy the museum without causing congestion or reducing the quality of the experience for others. #Step 4: Analyzing the Busy Museum Scenario#
03

b. When the museum is busy#

When the museum is busy, it becomes rival in consumption as the high number of visitors can negatively affect each other's experience (e.g., overcrowding, long waiting times). The museum remains excludable, as access can still be controlled. In this situation, the museum becomes a private good. The efficient price to charge during busy times is a higher fee, as this will help regulate the number of visitors and ensure a better experience for those willing to pay the higher price. This "peak pricing" strategy aims to balance the demand for the museum during high-demand periods, ensuring a more enjoyable visit for everyone.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Anyone with a radio receiver can listen to public radio, which is funded largely by donations. a. Is public radio excludable or nonexcludable? Is it rival in consumption or nonrival? What type of good is it? b. Should the government support public radio? Explain your reasoning. c. In order to finance itself, public radio decides to transmit only to satellite radios, for which users have to pay a fee. What type of good is public radio then? Will the quantity of radio listening be efficient? Why or why not?

The accompanying table shows six consumers' willingness to pay (his or her individual marginal benefit) for one MP3 file copy of a Jay-Z album. The marginal cost of making the file accessible to one additional consumer is constant, at zero. \begin{tabular}{l|c} Consumer & Individual marginal benefit \\\ Adriana & \(\$ 2\) \\\ Bhagesh & 15 \\\ Chizuko & 1 \\\ Denzel & 10 \\\ Emma & 5 \\\ Frank & 4 \end{tabular} a. What would be the efficient price to charge for a download of the file? b. All six consumers are able to download the file for free from a file- sharing service, Pantster. Which consumers will download the file? What will be the total consumer surplus to those consumers? c. Pantster is shut down for copyright law infringement. In order to download the file, consumers now have to pay \(\$ 4.99\) at a commercial music site. Which consumers will download the file? What will be the total consumer surplus to those consumers? How much producer surplus accrues to the commercial music site? What is the total surplus? What is the deadweight loss from the new pricing policy?

The government is involved in providing many goods and services. For each of the goods or services listed, determine whether it is rival or nonrival in consumption and whether it is excludable or nonexcludable. What type of good is it? Without government involvement, would the quantity provided be efficient, inefficiently low, or inefficiently high? a. Street signs b. Amtrak rail service c. Regulations limiting pollution d. A congested interstate highway without tolls e. A lighthouse on the coast

A residential community has 100 residents who are concerned about security. The accompanying table gives the total cost of hiring a 24 -hour security service as well as each individual resident's total benefit. \begin{tabular}{c|c|c} Quantity of security guards & Total cost & Total individual benefit to each resident \\ \hline 0 & \(\$ 0\) & \(\$ 0\) \\\ 1 & 150 & 10 \\\ 2 & 300 & 16 \\\ 3 & 450 & 18 \\\ 4 & 600 & 19 \end{tabular} a. Explain why the security service is a public good for the residents of the community. b. Calculate the marginal cost, the individual marginal benefit for each resident, and the marginal social benefit. c. If an individual resident were to decide about hiring and paying for security guards on his or her own, how many guards would that resident hire? d. If the residents act together, how many security guards will they hire?

Prior to 2003 , the city of London was often one big parking lot. Traffic jams were common, and it could take hours to travel a couple of miles. Each additional commuter contributed to the congestion, which can be measured by the total number of cars on London roads. Although each commuter suffered by spending valuable time in traffic, none of them paid for the inconvenience they caused others. The total cost of travel includes the opportunity cost of time spent in traffic and any fees levied by London authorities. a. Draw a graph illustrating the overuse of London roads, assuming that there is no fee to enter London in a vehicle and that roads are a common resource. Put the cost of travel on the vertical axis and the quantity of cars on the horizontal axis. Draw typical demand, individual marginal cost \((M C),\) and marginal social cost \((M S C)\) curves and label the equilibrium point. (Hint: The marginal cost takes into account the opportunity cost of spending time on the road for individual drivers but not the inconvenience they cause to others.) b. In February \(2003,\) the city of London began charging a \(£ 5\) congestion fee on all vehicles traveling in central London. Illustrate the effects of this congestion charge on your graph and label the new equilibrium point. Assume the new equilibrium point is not optimally set (that is, assume that the \(£ 5\) charge is too low relative to what would be efficient). c. The congestion fee was raised to \(£ 9\) in January 2011 . Illustrate the new equilibrium point on your graph, assuming the new charge is now optimally set.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free