In 2013, national income in the United States was \(\$ 14,542.4\) billion. In the same year, 137 million workers were employed, at an average wage, including benefits of \(\$ 64,667\) per worker per year. a. How much compensation of employees was paid in the United States in 2013 ? b. Analyze the factor distribution of income. What percentage of national income was received in the form of compensation to employees in \(2013 ?\) c. Suppose that a huge wave of corporate downsizing leads many terminated employees to open their own businesses. What is the effect on the factor distribution of income? d. Suppose the supply of labor rises due to an increase in the retirement age. What happens to the percentage of national income received in the form of compensation of employees?

Short Answer

Expert verified
In summary: a) In 2013, the total compensation of employees paid in the United States was approximately $8.859 trillion. b) Approximately 60.93% of the national income in 2013 was received in the form of compensation to employees. c) Corporate downsizing and terminated employees opening their own businesses can potentially shift the factor distribution of income, increasing the share of income going towards business owners and decreasing the share of income received as compensation of employees, depending on the success and characteristics of these new businesses. d) An increase in the retirement age, leading to a higher supply of labor, could have varying effects on the percentage of national income received in the form of compensation of employees, depending on the balance between wage pressures and economic growth as well as other factors like employment rates and income distribution across sectors.

Step by step solution

01

Compute Total Compensation of Employees

Multiply the number of employed workers (137 million) by the average wage (including benefits) per worker per year (\$64,667) to find the total compensation of employees paid in the United States in 2013: Total compensation = (137 * 10^6) * 64,667 = 8,859,379,000,000 #a. The total compensation of employees paid in the United States in 2013 is approximately \$8.859 trillion.
02

Find the Percentage of National Income received in the Form of Compensation of Employees

Divide the total compensation of employees (\$8.859 trillion) by the national income (\$14,542.4 billion) and multiply by 100 to find the percentage: Percentage = (8,859,379,000,000 / 14,542,400,000,000) * 100 = Approx. 60.93 #b. In 2013, approximately 60.93% of national income was received in the form of compensation to employees. #c. A wave of corporate downsizing that leads to terminated employees opening their own businesses could potentially cause a shift in the factor distribution of income. These self-employed individuals, now considered business owners, would receive income in the form of profits rather than as compensation of employees. As a result, there could be an increase in the share of income going toward business owners and a decrease in the share of income received as compensation of employees. However, these shifts would depend on how many terminated employees open successful businesses and how these new businesses compare to the pre-existing workforce in terms of compensation and profits. #d. If the supply of labor rises due to an increase in the retirement age, there could be several potential effects on the percentage of national income received in the form of compensation of employees. An increased labor supply could lead to a downward pressure on wages, which would decrease the share of national income received as compensation. Conversely, if this increase in labor supply is accompanied by an increase in productivity that leads to economic growth, the overall national income may rise and the share received as compensation of employees could remain steady or even increase. The actual outcome would depend on the balance between wage pressures and economic growth, as well as other factors such as employment rates and the distribution of income between different sectors of the economy.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Jameel runs a driver education school. The more driving instructors he hires, the more driving lessons he can sell. But because he owns a limited number of training automobiles, each additional driving instructor adds less to Jameel's output of driving lessons. The accompanying table shows Jameel's production function per day. Each driving lesson can be sold at \(\$ 35\) per hour. Determine Jameel's labor demand schedule (his demand schedule for driving instructors) for each of the following daily wage rates for driving instructors: \(\$ 160, \$ 180,\) \(\$ 200, \$ 220, \$ 240,\) and \(\$ 260\)

Marty's Frozen Yogurt has the production function per day shown in the accompanying table. The equilibrium wage rate for a worker is \(\$ 80\) per day. Each cup of frozen yogurt sells for \(\$ 2\). a. Calculate the marginal product of labor for each worker and the value of the marginal product of labor per worker. b. How many workers should Marty employ?

A New York Times article observed that the wage of farmworkers in Mexico was \(\$ 11\) an hour but the wage of immigrant Mexican farmworkers in California was \(\$ 9\) an hour. a. Assume that the output sells for the same price in the two countries. Does this imply that the marginal product of labor of farmworkers is higher in Mexico or in California? Explain your answer, and illustrate with a diagram that shows the demand and supply curves for labor in the respective markets. In your diagram, assume that the quantity supplied of labor for any given wage rate is the same for Mexican farmworkers as it is for immigrant Mexican farmworkers in California. b. Now suppose that farmwork in Mexico is more arduous and more dangerous than farmwork in California. As a result, the quantity supplied of labor for any given wage rate is not the same for Mexican farmworkers as it is for immigrant Mexican farmworkers in California. How does this change your answer to part a? What concept best accounts for the difference between wage rates for Mexican farmworkers and immigrant Mexican farmworkers in California? c. Illustrate your answer to part b with a diagram. In this diagram, assume that the quantity of labor demanded for any given wage rate is the same for Mexican employers as it is for Californian employers.

You are the governor's economic policy adviser. The governor wants to put in place policies that encourage employed people to work more hours at their jobs and that encourage unemployed people to find and take jobs. Assess each of the following policies in terms of reaching that goal. Explain your reasoning in terms of income and substitution effects, and indicate when the impact of the policy may be ambiguous. a. The state income tax rate is lowered, which has the effect of increasing workers' after-tax wage rate. b. The state income tax rate is increased, which has the effect of decreasing workers' after-tax wage rate. c. The state property tax rate is increased, which reduces workers' after-tax income.

For each of the following situations in which similar workers are paid different wages, give the most likely explanation for these wage differences. a. Test pilots for new jet aircraft earn higher wages than airline pilots. b. College graduates usually have higher earnings in their first year on the job than workers without college degrees have in their first year on the job. c. Full professors command higher salaries than assistant professors for teaching the same class. d. Unionized workers are generally better paid than non-unionized workers.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free