A representative of the American clothing industry recently made the following statement: "Workers in Asia often work in sweatshop conditions earning only pennies an hour. American workers are more productive and as a result earn higher wages. In order to preserve the dignity of the American workplace, the government should enact legislation banning imports of low-wage Asian clothing." a. Which parts of this quote are positive statements? Which parts are normative statements? b. Is the policy that is being advocated consistent with the preceding statements about the wages and productivities of American and Asian workers? c. Would such a policy make some Americans better off without making any other Americans worse off? That is, would this policy be efficient from the viewpoint of all Americans? d. Would low-wage Asian workers benefit from or be hurt by such a policy?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: The positive statements in the quote are: 1. "Workers in Asia often work in sweatshop conditions earning only pennies an hour." 2. "American workers are more productive and as a result earn higher wages." The normative statement in the quote is: 1. "In order to preserve the dignity of the American workplace, the government should enact legislation banning imports of low-wage Asian clothing."

Step by step solution

01

Understand Positive and Normative Statements

Positive statements are statements that describe the objective facts or an existing scenario and can be proven true or false. Normative statements, on the other hand, express value judgments about what is morally right or wrong, good or bad and they cannot be proven true or false.
02

Identify Positive Statements in the Quote

In the given quote, the following parts are positive statements: 1. "Workers in Asia often work in sweatshop conditions earning only pennies an hour." 2. "American workers are more productive and as a result earn higher wages."
03

Identify Normative Statements in the Quote

In the given quote, the following part is a normative statement: 1. "In order to preserve the dignity of the American workplace, the government should enact legislation banning imports of low-wage Asian clothing." #b. Consistency with Wages and Productivities of American and Asian workers#
04

Analyze the Policy Advocated in the Statement

The policy advocated in the statement is banning imports of low-wage Asian clothing in order to preserve the dignity of the American workplace. We are to examine whether this policy is consistent with the preceding statements about the wages and productivities of American and Asian workers.
05

Evaluate the Consistency

The statement mentions American workers being more productive and earning higher wages as compared to Asian workers who earn low wages working in sweatshop conditions. Banning imports of low-wage Asian clothing could lead American businesses to produce the clothing domestically, which could potentially benefit American workers. So, the policy being advocated is consistent with the wage and productivity information provided in the statement. #c. Efficiency from the Viewpoint of All Americans#
06

Define Efficiency

Efficiency refers to a situation where resources are allocated in such a way that no one can be made better off without making someone else worse off.
07

Evaluate the Policy's Efficiency for All Americans

The policy of banning low-wage Asian clothing imports could potentially benefit American workers and the domestic clothing industry, as it might lead to increased demand for their products and possibly higher wages. However, it could also lead to higher prices for consumers due to higher production costs in the United States. This would make some Americans worse off, as they would have to spend more on clothing. Therefore, the policy would not be efficient from the viewpoint of all Americans. #d. Impact on Low-wage Asian Workers#
08

Analyze the Potential Impact of the Policy on Low-wage Asian Workers

If the policy banning low-wage Asian clothing imports is enacted, the demand for clothing produced by low-wage Asian workers could decrease.
09

Evaluate the Effect on Low-wage Asian Workers

A decrease in demand for clothing produced by low-wage Asian workers may lead to job losses and reduced income opportunities for these workers, making them worse off. This could potentially exacerbate poverty and negatively affect living conditions in the affected countries. Therefore, low-wage Asian workers would likely be hurt by the policy.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Evaluate the following statement: "It is easier to build an economic model that accurately reflects events that have already occurred than to build an economic model to forecast future events." Do you think this is true or not? Why? What does this imply about the difficulties of building good economic models?

Two important industries on the island of Bermuda are fishing and tourism. According to data from the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and the Bermuda Department of Statistics, in 2009 the 306 registered fishermen in Bermuda caught 387 metric tons of marine fish. And the 2,719 people employed by hotels produced 554,400 hotel stays (measured by the number of visitor arrivals). Suppose that this production point is efficient in production. Assume also that the opportunity cost of 1 additional metric ton of fish is 2,000 hotel stays and that this opportunity cost is constant (the opportunity cost does not change). a. If all 306 registered fishermen were to be employed by hotels (in addition to the 2,719 people already working in hotels), how many hotel stays could Bermuda produce? b. If all 2,719 hotel employees were to become fishermen (in addition to the 306 fishermen already working in the fishing industry), how many metric tons of fish could Bermuda produce? c. Draw a production possibility frontier for Bermuda, with fish on the horizontal axis and hotel stays on the vertical axis, and label Bermuda's actual production point for the year 2009 .

Economists who work for the government are often called on to make policy recommendations. Why do you think it is important for the public to be able to differentiate normative statements from positive statements in these recommendations?

Peter Pundit, an economics reporter, states that the European Union (EU) is increasing its productivity very rapidly in all industries. He claims that this productivity advance is so rapid that output from the \(\mathrm{EU}\) in these industries will soon exceed that of the United States and, as a result, the United States will no longer benefit from trade with the EU. a. Do you think Peter Pundit is correct or not? If not, what do you think is the source of his mistake? b. If the \(\mathrm{EU}\) and the United States continue to trade, what do you think will characterize the goods that the EU sells to the United States and the goods that the United States sells to the EU?

You are in charge of allocating residents to your dormitory's baseball and basketball teams. You are down to the last four people, two of whom must be allocated to baseball and two to basketball. The accompanying table gives each person's batting average and freethrow average. $$ \begin{array}{l|c|c} \text { Name } & \text { Batting average } & \text { Free-throw average } \\\ \text { Kelley } & 70 \% & 60 \% \\\ \text { Jackie } & 50 \% & 50 \% \\\ \text { Curt } & 10 \% & 30 \% \\\ \text { Gerry } & 80 \% & 70 \% \end{array} $$ a. Explain how you would use the concept of comparative advantage to allocate the players. Begin by establishing each player's opportunity cost of free throws in terms of batting average. b. Why is it likely that the other basketball players will be unhappy about this arrangement but the other baseball players will be satisfied? Nonetheless, why would an economist say that this is an efficient way to allocate players for your dormitory's sports teams?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free