According to data from the U.S. Department of $\begin{array}{lll}\text { Agriculture's } & \text { National } & \text { Agricultural } & \text { Statistics }\end{array}$ Service, 124 million acres of land in the United States were used for wheat or corn farming in a recent year. Of those 124 million acres, farmers used 50 million acres to grow 2.158 billion bushels of wheat and 74 million acres to grow 11.807 billion bushels of corn. Suppose that U.S. wheat and corn farming is efficient in production. At that production point, the opportunity cost of producing 1 additional bushel of wheat is 1.7 fewer bushels of corn. However, because farmers have increasing opportunity costs, additional bushels of wheat have an opportunity cost greater than 1.7 bushels of corn. For each of the following production points, decide whether that production point is (i) feasible and efficient in production, (ii) feasible but not efficient in production, (iii) not feasible, or (iv) unclear as to whether or not it is feasible. a. Farmers use 40 million acres of land to produce 1.8 billion bushels of wheat, and they use 60 million acres of land to produce 9 billion bushels of corn. The remaining 24 million acres are left unused. b. From their original production point, farmers transfer 40 million acres of land from corn to wheat production. They now produce 3.158 billion bushels of wheat and 10.107 bushels of corn. c. Farmers reduce their production of wheat to 2 billion bushels and increase their production of corn to 12.044 billion bushels. Along the production possibility frontier, the opportunity cost of going from 11.807 billion bushels of corn to 12.044 billion bushels of corn is 0.666 bushel of wheat per bushel of corn.

Short Answer

Expert verified
a) Farmers use 40 million acres to produce 1.8 billion bushels of wheat and 60 million acres to produce 9 billion bushels of corn. b) From the original production point, farmers transfer 40 million acres from corn to wheat, now producing 3.158 billion bushels of wheat and 10.107 bushels of corn. c) Farmers reduce their production of wheat to 2 billion bushels and increase their production of corn to 12.044 billion bushels. Answer: Unclear as to whether or not any of the given points is an efficient use of resources.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the given information

This problem tells us that in total, there are 124 million acres of land used for wheat or corn farming. Farmers used 50 million acres for 2.158 billion bushels wheat and 74 million acres for 11.807 billion bushels corn. The opportunity cost of producing 1 additional bushel of wheat is 1.7 fewer bushels of corn. Because of increasing opportunity costs, additional bushels of wheat have an opportunity cost greater than 1.7 bushels of corn.
02

Analyze production point (a)

In this scenario, farmers use 40 million acres to produce 1.8 billion bushels of wheat and 60 million acres to produce 9 billion bushels of corn. This leaves 24 million acres unused. Since the total acreage available for use is 124 million acres and only 100 million acres are being used, this point is feasible as there is still land available that hasn't been used. However, since they are not using all available land resources, it is not efficient in production. Answer: (ii) Feasible but not efficient in production.
03

Analyze production point (b)

From the original production point, farmers transfer 40 million acres from corn to wheat, which means they have now 90 million acres for wheat and 34 million acres for corn. They now produce 3.158 billion bushels of wheat and 10.107 bushels of corn. Since there is no information about total acreage being altered, and since the opportunity cost of producing 1 additional bushel of wheat is increasing, we cannot determine the feasibility of this point without more information. Answer: (iv) Unclear as to whether or not it is feasible.
04

Analyze production point (c)

In this situation, farmers reduce their production of wheat to 2 billion bushels and increase their production of corn to 12.044 billion bushels. Along the production possibility frontier, the opportunity cost of going from 11.807 billion bushels of corn to 12.044 billion bushels of corn is 0.666 bushel of wheat per bushel of corn. Here, we can see that the opportunity cost of producing an additional bushel of corn is less than the initial opportunity cost mentioned in the problem (1.7). Since the problem states that opportunity costs are increasing, this situation is not feasible. Answer: (iii) Not feasible.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The inhabitants of the fictional economy of Atlantis use money in the form of cowry shells. Draw a circular-flow diagram showing households and firms. Firms produce potatoes and fish, and households buy potatoes and fish. Households also provide the land and labor to firms. Identify where in the flows of cowry shells or physical things (goods and services, or resources) each of the following impacts would occur. Describe how this impact spreads around the circle. a. A devastating hurricane floods many of the potato fields. b. A very productive fishing season yields a very large number of fish caught. c. The inhabitants of Atlantis discover Shakira and spend several days a month at dancing festivals.

You are in charge of allocating residents to your dormitory's baseball and basketball teams. You are down to the last four people, two of whom must be allocated to baseball and two to basketball. The accompanying table gives each person's batting average and freethrow average. $$ \begin{array}{l|c|c} \text { Name } & \text { Batting average } & \text { Free-throw average } \\\ \text { Kelley } & 70 \% & 60 \% \\\ \text { Jackie } & 50 \% & 50 \% \\\ \text { Curt } & 10 \% & 30 \% \\\ \text { Gerry } & 80 \% & 70 \% \end{array} $$ a. Explain how you would use the concept of comparative advantage to allocate the players. Begin by establishing each player's opportunity cost of free throws in terms of batting average. b. Why is it likely that the other basketball players will be unhappy about this arrangement but the other baseball players will be satisfied? Nonetheless, why would an economist say that this is an efficient way to allocate players for your dormitory's sports teams?

A representative of the American clothing industry recently made the following statement: "Workers in Asia often work in sweatshop conditions earning only pennies an hour. American workers are more productive and as a result earn higher wages. In order to preserve the dignity of the American workplace, the government should enact legislation banning imports of low-wage Asian clothing." a. Which parts of this quote are positive statements? Which parts are normative statements? b. Is the policy that is being advocated consistent with the preceding statements about the wages and productivities of American and Asian workers? c. Would such a policy make some Americans better off without making any other Americans worse off? That is, would this policy be efficient from the viewpoint of all Americans? d. Would low-wage Asian workers benefit from or be hurt by such a policy?

Peter Pundit, an economics reporter, states that the European Union (EU) is increasing its productivity very rapidly in all industries. He claims that this productivity advance is so rapid that output from the \(\mathrm{EU}\) in these industries will soon exceed that of the United States and, as a result, the United States will no longer benefit from trade with the EU. a. Do you think Peter Pundit is correct or not? If not, what do you think is the source of his mistake? b. If the \(\mathrm{EU}\) and the United States continue to trade, what do you think will characterize the goods that the EU sells to the United States and the goods that the United States sells to the EU?

Are the following statements true or false? Explain your answers. a. "When people must pay higher taxes on their wage earnings, it reduces their incentive to work" is a positive statement. b. "We should lower taxes to encourage more work" is a positive statement. c. Economics cannot always be used to completely decide what society ought to do. d. "The system of public education in this country generates greater benefits to society than the cost of running the system" is a normative statement. e. All disagreements among economists are generated by the media.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free