One July, the United States sold aircraft worth \(\$ 1\) billion to China and bought aircraft worth only \(\$ 19,000\) from China. During the same month, however, the United States bought \(\$ 83\) million worth of men's trousers, slacks, and jeans from China but sold only \(\$ 8,000\) worth of trousers, slacks, and jeans to China. Using what you have learned about how trade is determined by comparative advantage, answer the following questions. a. Which country has the comparative advantage in aircraft production? In production of trousers, slacks, and jeans? b. Can you determine which country has the absolute advantage in aircraft production? In production of trousers, slacks, and jeans?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: The United States has a comparative advantage in aircraft production, while China has a comparative advantage in trousers, slacks, and jeans production.

Step by step solution

01

Analyze the trade of aircraft between United States and China

In July, the United States sold aircraft worth \(1\) billion to China, while China sold aircraft worth only \(19,000\) to the United States. This trade pattern suggests that the United States has a comparative advantage in aircraft production.
02

Analyze the trade of trousers, slacks, and jeans between United States and China

In the same month, the United States bought \(\$ 83\) million worth of men's trousers, slacks, and jeans from China, while China bought just \(\$ 8,000\) worth of these products from the United States. This trade pattern indicates that China has a comparative advantage in trousers, slacks, and jeans production. #b. Absolute advantage in aircraft production and trousers production# To determine absolute advantage, we would need information about the production capabilities of the two countries when using the same resources. Since the exercise does not provide such information, we cannot directly determine absolute advantage. However, based on the trade patterns, we can infer that the United States has an absolute advantage in aircraft production, as they sold dramatically higher quantities of aircraft to China than they imported. Similarly, we can infer that China has an absolute advantage in trousers, slacks, and jeans production because of the significant difference in the quantities traded.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

An economist might say that colleges and universities "produce" education, using faculty members and students as inputs. According to this line of reasoning, education is then "consumed" by households. Construct a circular- flow diagram to represent the sector of the economy devoted to college education: colleges and universities represent firms, and households both consume education and provide faculty and students to universities. What are the relevant markets in this diagram? What is being bought and sold in each direction? What would happen in the diagram if the government decided to subsidize \(50 \%\) of all college students' tuition?

According to data from the U.S. Department of $\begin{array}{lll}\text { Agriculture's } & \text { National } & \text { Agricultural } & \text { Statistics }\end{array}$ Service, 124 million acres of land in the United States were used for wheat or corn farming in a recent year. Of those 124 million acres, farmers used 50 million acres to grow 2.158 billion bushels of wheat and 74 million acres to grow 11.807 billion bushels of corn. Suppose that U.S. wheat and corn farming is efficient in production. At that production point, the opportunity cost of producing 1 additional bushel of wheat is 1.7 fewer bushels of corn. However, because farmers have increasing opportunity costs, additional bushels of wheat have an opportunity cost greater than 1.7 bushels of corn. For each of the following production points, decide whether that production point is (i) feasible and efficient in production, (ii) feasible but not efficient in production, (iii) not feasible, or (iv) unclear as to whether or not it is feasible. a. Farmers use 40 million acres of land to produce 1.8 billion bushels of wheat, and they use 60 million acres of land to produce 9 billion bushels of corn. The remaining 24 million acres are left unused. b. From their original production point, farmers transfer 40 million acres of land from corn to wheat production. They now produce 3.158 billion bushels of wheat and 10.107 bushels of corn. c. Farmers reduce their production of wheat to 2 billion bushels and increase their production of corn to 12.044 billion bushels. Along the production possibility frontier, the opportunity cost of going from 11.807 billion bushels of corn to 12.044 billion bushels of corn is 0.666 bushel of wheat per bushel of corn.

Two important industries on the island of Bermuda are fishing and tourism. According to data from the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and the Bermuda Department of Statistics, in 2009 the 306 registered fishermen in Bermuda caught 387 metric tons of marine fish. And the 2,719 people employed by hotels produced 554,400 hotel stays (measured by the number of visitor arrivals). Suppose that this production point is efficient in production. Assume also that the opportunity cost of 1 additional metric ton of fish is 2,000 hotel stays and that this opportunity cost is constant (the opportunity cost does not change). a. If all 306 registered fishermen were to be employed by hotels (in addition to the 2,719 people already working in hotels), how many hotel stays could Bermuda produce? b. If all 2,719 hotel employees were to become fishermen (in addition to the 306 fishermen already working in the fishing industry), how many metric tons of fish could Bermuda produce? c. Draw a production possibility frontier for Bermuda, with fish on the horizontal axis and hotel stays on the vertical axis, and label Bermuda's actual production point for the year 2009 .

A representative of the American clothing industry recently made the following statement: "Workers in Asia often work in sweatshop conditions earning only pennies an hour. American workers are more productive and as a result earn higher wages. In order to preserve the dignity of the American workplace, the government should enact legislation banning imports of low-wage Asian clothing." a. Which parts of this quote are positive statements? Which parts are normative statements? b. Is the policy that is being advocated consistent with the preceding statements about the wages and productivities of American and Asian workers? c. Would such a policy make some Americans better off without making any other Americans worse off? That is, would this policy be efficient from the viewpoint of all Americans? d. Would low-wage Asian workers benefit from or be hurt by such a policy?

You are in charge of allocating residents to your dormitory's baseball and basketball teams. You are down to the last four people, two of whom must be allocated to baseball and two to basketball. The accompanying table gives each person's batting average and freethrow average. $$ \begin{array}{l|c|c} \text { Name } & \text { Batting average } & \text { Free-throw average } \\\ \text { Kelley } & 70 \% & 60 \% \\\ \text { Jackie } & 50 \% & 50 \% \\\ \text { Curt } & 10 \% & 30 \% \\\ \text { Gerry } & 80 \% & 70 \% \end{array} $$ a. Explain how you would use the concept of comparative advantage to allocate the players. Begin by establishing each player's opportunity cost of free throws in terms of batting average. b. Why is it likely that the other basketball players will be unhappy about this arrangement but the other baseball players will be satisfied? Nonetheless, why would an economist say that this is an efficient way to allocate players for your dormitory's sports teams?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free