You are in charge of allocating residents to your dormitory's baseball and basketball teams. You are down to the last four people, two of whom must be allocated to baseball and two to basketball. The accompanying table gives each person's batting average and freethrow average. $$ \begin{array}{l|c|c} \text { Name } & \text { Batting average } & \text { Free-throw average } \\\ \text { Kelley } & 70 \% & 60 \% \\\ \text { Jackie } & 50 \% & 50 \% \\\ \text { Curt } & 10 \% & 30 \% \\\ \text { Gerry } & 80 \% & 70 \% \end{array} $$ a. Explain how you would use the concept of comparative advantage to allocate the players. Begin by establishing each player's opportunity cost of free throws in terms of batting average. b. Why is it likely that the other basketball players will be unhappy about this arrangement but the other baseball players will be satisfied? Nonetheless, why would an economist say that this is an efficient way to allocate players for your dormitory's sports teams?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Question: Based on the provided analysis and solution, explain the allocated sports teams of the last four players in the dormitory league and why the allocation is considered efficient from an economist's standpoint. Answer: The last four players, Kelley and Gerry, were assigned to the baseball team, while Jackie and Curt were assigned to the basketball team. This allocation is considered efficient because the players were assigned to teams based on their comparative advantage in batting average and free-throw average. By doing so, it maximizes overall team performance and better utilizes the limited resources (the last four players) in the dormitory league, which is an essential aspect of economic efficiency.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate Opportunity Cost for Each Player

First, we will find the opportunity cost of free throws in terms of batting average for each player. The opportunity cost is the cost of giving up one unit of good (in this case, baseball) to specialize in one unit of another good (in this case, basketball). To find the opportunity cost for each player, we will use the formula: $${\text{Opportunity Cost}} = \frac{\text{Batting Average}}{\text{Free-Throw Average}}$$
02

Find Opportunity Cost for Kelley

For Kelley, $${\text{Opportunity Cost}} = \frac{70\%}{60\%} = 1.17$$
03

Find Opportunity Cost for Jackie

For Jackie, $${\text{Opportunity Cost}} = \frac{50\%}{50\%} = 1.00$$
04

Find Opportunity Cost for Curt

For Curt, $${\text{Opportunity Cost}} = \frac{10\%}{30\%} = 0.33$$
05

Find Opportunity Cost for Gerry

For Gerry, $${\text{Opportunity Cost}} = \frac{80\%}{70\%} = 1.14$$
06

Assign Players Based on Comparative Advantage

Now, we'll assign the players to baseball or basketball teams based on their comparative advantage. Players with lower opportunity cost in terms of batting average will be better at basketball, while those with higher opportunity cost will be better at baseball. Kelley and Gerry have the highest opportunity costs (1.17 and 1.14, respectively), so they will be assigned to the baseball team. Jackie and Curt have the lowest opportunity costs (1.00 and 0.33, respectively), so they will be assigned to the basketball team.
07

Discuss Players' Satisfaction and Efficiency

Other basketball players might be unhappy because they see that Curt has a low free-throw average compared to other players, while other baseball players may be satisfied because they see Kelley and Gerry performing well in batting. Nonetheless, an economist would say that this is an efficient way to allocate players for the dormitory sports teams because it maximizes the overall performance by utilizing each player's comparative advantage in baseball or basketball. By focusing on their respective comparative advantages, each player can contribute more effectively to their team's overall success. This specialization and trade-off allow both baseball and basketball teams to make better use of limited resources (the last four players), thus demonstrating efficiency in the allocation process.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Two important industries on the island of Bermuda are fishing and tourism. According to data from the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and the Bermuda Department of Statistics, in 2009 the 306 registered fishermen in Bermuda caught 387 metric tons of marine fish. And the 2,719 people employed by hotels produced 554,400 hotel stays (measured by the number of visitor arrivals). Suppose that this production point is efficient in production. Assume also that the opportunity cost of 1 additional metric ton of fish is 2,000 hotel stays and that this opportunity cost is constant (the opportunity cost does not change). a. If all 306 registered fishermen were to be employed by hotels (in addition to the 2,719 people already working in hotels), how many hotel stays could Bermuda produce? b. If all 2,719 hotel employees were to become fishermen (in addition to the 306 fishermen already working in the fishing industry), how many metric tons of fish could Bermuda produce? c. Draw a production possibility frontier for Bermuda, with fish on the horizontal axis and hotel stays on the vertical axis, and label Bermuda's actual production point for the year 2009 .

One July, the United States sold aircraft worth \(\$ 1\) billion to China and bought aircraft worth only \(\$ 19,000\) from China. During the same month, however, the United States bought \(\$ 83\) million worth of men's trousers, slacks, and jeans from China but sold only \(\$ 8,000\) worth of trousers, slacks, and jeans to China. Using what you have learned about how trade is determined by comparative advantage, answer the following questions. a. Which country has the comparative advantage in aircraft production? In production of trousers, slacks, and jeans? b. Can you determine which country has the absolute advantage in aircraft production? In production of trousers, slacks, and jeans?

Atlantis is a small, isolated island in the South Atlantic. The inhabitants grow potatoes and catch fish. The accompanying table shows the maximum annual output combinations of potatoes and fish that can be produced. Obviously, given their limited resources and available technology, as they use more of their resources for potato production, there are fewer resources available for catching fish. $$ \begin{array}{c|c|c} \begin{array}{c} \text { Maximum annual } \\\ \text { output options } \end{array} & \begin{array}{c} \text { Quantity of } \\\ \text { potatoes (pounds) } \end{array} & \begin{array}{c} \text { Quantity of } \\\ \text { fish (pounds) } \end{array} \\\ \text { A } & 1,000 & 0 \\\ \text { B } & 800 & 300 \\\ \text { C } & 600 & 500 \\\ \text { D } & 400 & 600 \\\ \text { E } & 200 & 650 \\\ \text { F } & 0 & 675 \end{array} $$ a. Draw a production possibility frontier with potatoes on the horizontal axis and fish on the vertical axis illustrating these options, showing points \(A-F\) b. Can Atlantis produce 500 pounds of fish and 800 pounds of potatoes? Explain. Where would this point lie relative to the production possibility frontier? c. What is the opportunity cost of increasing the annual output of potatoes from 600 to 800 pounds? d. What is the opportunity cost of increasing the annual output of potatoes from 200 to 400 pounds? e. Can you explain why the answers to parts \(\mathrm{c}\) and \(\mathrm{d}\) are not the same? What does this imply about the slope of the production possibility frontier?

The mayor of Gotham City, worried about a potential epidemic of deadly influenza this winter, asks an economic adviser the following series of questions. Determine whether a question requires the economic adviser to make a positive assessment or a normative assessment. a. How much vaccine will be in stock in the city by the end of November? b. If we offer to pay \(10 \%\) more per dose to the pharmaceutical companies providing the vaccines, will they provide additional doses? c. If there is a shortage of vaccine in the city, whom should we vaccinate first \(-\) the elderly or the very young? (Assume that a person from one group has an equal likelihood of dying from influenza as a person from the other group.) d. If the city charges \(\$ 25\) per shot, how many people will pay? e. If the city charges \(\$ 25\) per shot, it will make a profit of \(\$ 10\) per shot, money that can go to pay for inoculating poor people. Should the city engage in such a scheme?

According to data from the U.S. Department of $\begin{array}{lll}\text { Agriculture's } & \text { National } & \text { Agricultural } & \text { Statistics }\end{array}$ Service, 124 million acres of land in the United States were used for wheat or corn farming in a recent year. Of those 124 million acres, farmers used 50 million acres to grow 2.158 billion bushels of wheat and 74 million acres to grow 11.807 billion bushels of corn. Suppose that U.S. wheat and corn farming is efficient in production. At that production point, the opportunity cost of producing 1 additional bushel of wheat is 1.7 fewer bushels of corn. However, because farmers have increasing opportunity costs, additional bushels of wheat have an opportunity cost greater than 1.7 bushels of corn. For each of the following production points, decide whether that production point is (i) feasible and efficient in production, (ii) feasible but not efficient in production, (iii) not feasible, or (iv) unclear as to whether or not it is feasible. a. Farmers use 40 million acres of land to produce 1.8 billion bushels of wheat, and they use 60 million acres of land to produce 9 billion bushels of corn. The remaining 24 million acres are left unused. b. From their original production point, farmers transfer 40 million acres of land from corn to wheat production. They now produce 3.158 billion bushels of wheat and 10.107 bushels of corn. c. Farmers reduce their production of wheat to 2 billion bushels and increase their production of corn to 12.044 billion bushels. Along the production possibility frontier, the opportunity cost of going from 11.807 billion bushels of corn to 12.044 billion bushels of corn is 0.666 bushel of wheat per bushel of corn.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free