There is a debate about whether sterile hypodermic needles should be passed out free of charge in cities with high drug use. Proponents argue that doing so will reduce the incidence of diseases, such as HIV/ AIDS, that are often spread by needle sharing among drug users. Opponents believe that doing so will encourage more drug use by reducing the risks of this behavior. As an economist asked to assess the policy, you must know the following: (i) how responsive the spread of diseases like HIV/AIDS is to the price of sterile needles and (ii) how responsive drug use is to the price of sterile needles. Assuming that you know these two things, use the concepts of price elasticity of demand for sterile needles and the cross-price elasticity between drugs and sterile needles to answer the following questions. a. In what circumstances do you believe this is a beneficial policy? b. In what circumstances do you believe this is a bad policy?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: Providing free sterile hypodermic needles would be considered a beneficial policy if the price elasticity of demand for sterile needles is high (greater than 1) and the cross-price elasticity between drugs and sterile needles is low. This would lead to a significant increase in demand for needles while not greatly impacting the demand for drugs, thus decreasing the spread of diseases through needle-sharing without significantly impacting drug use.

Step by step solution

01

a. Circumstances in which providing free sterile needles is a beneficial policy

Step 1: High price elasticity of demand for sterile needles If people are highly responsive to the price change in sterile needles, the price elasticity of demand for sterile needles will be high (greater than 1). This implies that as the price of needles decreases (or becomes free), the demand for these needles will increase significantly. Step 2: Low cross-price elasticity between drugs and sterile needles The cross-price elasticity measures the responsiveness of the demand for one good to a change in the price of another good. If the cross-price elasticity between drugs and sterile needles is low, it means a change in the price of needles will not greatly impact the demand for drugs. People might not be encouraged to use more drugs if sterile needles are provided free of charge. Step 3: Determine if the policy is beneficial If the price elasticity of demand for sterile needles is high and the cross-price elasticity between drugs and sterile needles is low, providing sterile needles free of charge would likely be a beneficial policy, as the spread of diseases through needle-sharing would decrease without significantly impacting drug use.
02

b. Circumstances in which providing free sterile needles is a bad policy

Step 1: Low price elasticity of demand for sterile needles If people are not highly responsive to the price change in sterile needles, the price elasticity of demand for sterile needles will be low (less than 1). This implies that a decrease in the price of needles (or making them free) will not lead to a significant increase in the demand for these needles. Step 2: High cross-price elasticity between drugs and sterile needles If the cross-price elasticity between drugs and sterile needles is high, it means that a change in the price of needles will greatly impact the demand for drugs. People may be encouraged to use more drugs if sterile needles are provided free of charge. Step 3: Determine if the policy is not beneficial If the price elasticity of demand for sterile needles is low and the cross-price elasticity between drugs and sterile needles is high, providing sterile needles free of charge would likely be a bad policy, as the spread of diseases through needle-sharing may not decrease significantly, and drug use could even increase due to reduced needle costs.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Use an elasticity concept to explain each of the following observations. a. During economic booms, the number of new personal care businesses, such as gyms and tanning salons, is proportionately greater than the number of other new businesses, such as grocery stores. b. Cement is the primary building material in Mexico. After new technology makes cement cheaper to produce, the supply curve for the Mexican cement industry becomes relatively flatter. c. Some goods that were once considered luxuries, like a telephone, are now considered virtual necessities. As a result, the demand curve for telephone services has become steeper over time. d. Consumers in a less developed country like Guatemala spend proportionately more of their income on equipment for producing things at home, like sewing machines, than consumers in a more developed country like Canada.

What can you conclude about the price elasticity of demand in each of the following statements? a. "The pizza delivery business in this town is very competitive. I'd lose half my customers if I raised the price by as little as \(10 \%\)." b. "I owned both of the two Jerry Garcia autographed lithographs in existence. I sold one on eBay for a high price. But when I sold the second one, the price dropped by \(80 \%\)." c. "My economics professor has chosen to use the Krugman/Wells textbook for this class. I have no choice but to buy this book." d. "I always spend a total of exactly \(\$ 10\) per week on coffee."

The accompanying table shows the price and yearly quantity sold of souvenir T-shirts in the town of Crystal Lake according to the average income of the tourists visiting. $$ \begin{array}{c|c|c} & \begin{array}{c} \text { Quantity of T-shirts } \\\ \text { demanded when } \\\ \text { average tourist } \end{array} & \begin{array}{c} \text { Quantity of T-shirts } \\\ \text { demanded when } \end{array} \\\ \text { Price of } & \text { average tourist } \\\ \text { T-shirt } & \text { income is } \$ 20,000 & \text { income is } \$ 30,000 \\ \hline \$ 4 & 3,000 & 5,000 \\\ 5 & 2,400 & 4,200 \\\ 6 & 1,600 & 3,000 \\\ 7 & 800 & 1,800 \end{array} $$ a. Using the midpoint method, calculate the price elasticity of demand when the price of a T-shirt rises from \(\$ 5\) to \(\$ 6\) and the average tourist income is \(\$ 20,000 .\) Also calculate it when the average tourist income is \(\$ 30,000\). b. Using the midpoint method, calculate the income elasticity of demand when the price of a T-shirt is \(\$ 4\) and the average tourist income increases from \(\$ 20,000\) to \(\$ 30,000 .\) Also calculate it when the price is \(\$ 7\)

A recent report by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), published in the CDC's Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, studied the effect of an increase in the price of beer on the incidence of new cases of sexually transmitted disease in young adults. In particular, the researchers analyzed the responsiveness of gonorrhea cases to a tax-induced increase in the price of beer. The report concluded that "the.... analysis suggested that a beer tax increase of \(\$ 0.20\) per six-pack could reduce overall gonorrhea rates by \(8.9 \% . "\) Assume that a sixpack costs \(\$ 5.90\) before the price increase. Use the midpoint method to determine the percent increase in the price of a six-pack, and then calculate the cross-price elasticity of demand between beer and incidence of gonorrhea. According to your estimate of this cross-price elasticity of demand, are beer and gonorrhea complements or substitutes?

The U.S. government is considering reducing the amount of carbon dioxide that firms are allowed to produce by issuing a limited number of tradable allowances for carbon dioxide \(\left(\mathrm{CO}_{2}\right)\) emissions. In an April 25 , 2007, report, the U.S. Congressional Budget Office (CBO) argues that "most of the cost of meeting a cap on \(\mathrm{CO}_{2}\) emissions would be borne by consumers, who would face persistently higher prices for products such as electricity and gasoline \(\ldots\) poorer households would bear a larger burden relative to their income than wealthier households would." What assumption about one of the elasticities you learned about in this chapter has to be true for poorer households to be disproportionately affected?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free