A recent report by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), published in the CDC's Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, studied the effect of an increase in the price of beer on the incidence of new cases of sexually transmitted disease in young adults. In particular, the researchers analyzed the responsiveness of gonorrhea cases to a tax-induced increase in the price of beer. The report concluded that "the.... analysis suggested that a beer tax increase of \(\$ 0.20\) per six-pack could reduce overall gonorrhea rates by \(8.9 \% . "\) Assume that a sixpack costs \(\$ 5.90\) before the price increase. Use the midpoint method to determine the percent increase in the price of a six-pack, and then calculate the cross-price elasticity of demand between beer and incidence of gonorrhea. According to your estimate of this cross-price elasticity of demand, are beer and gonorrhea complements or substitutes?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: The cross-price elasticity of demand between beer and the incidence of gonorrhea is -2.67, and they are complements since the calculated value is negative.

Step by step solution

01

Determine the New Price of a Six-Pack with the Tax Increase

To determine the new price of a six-pack after the tax increase of \(0.20\), we need to add the tax increase to the original price. The original price is \(5.90\), so the new price is \(5.90 + 0.20 = \$ 6.10\).
02

Calculate the Percent Increase in the Price of a Six-Pack using the Midpoint Method

The midpoint method is given by the formula: `Percent Increase = (New Price - Old Price) / Midpoint × 100` Here, the midpoint is `((Old Price + New Price) / 2)`. So we have: Midpoint = (5.90 + 6.10) / 2 = \(6.00\) Percent Increase = (6.10 - 5.90) / 6.00 × 100 ≈ 3.33 %
03

Calculate the Cross-Price Elasticity of Demand Between Beer and Incidence of Gonorrhea

The cross-price elasticity of demand is given by the formula: `Cross-Price Elasticity = (Percentage Change in Quantity Demanded of Good 2) / (Percentage Change in Price of Good 1)` In this case, the percentage change in the price of beer is 3.33%, and the percentage change in the incidence of gonorrhea is -8.9%. So we have: Cross-Price Elasticity = (-8.9) / 3.33 ≈ -2.67
04

Determine if Beer and Gonorrhea are Complements or Substitutes

The cross-price elasticity of demand tells us the relationship between two goods. If the cross-price elasticity is positive, the two goods are considered substitutes. If it's negative, the goods are considered complements. Since the cross-price elasticity we calculated in Step 3 is -2.67, which is negative, we can conclude that beer and gonorrhea are complements. This means that an increase in the price of beer leads to a reduction in the incidence of gonorrhea.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Taiwan is a major world supplier of semiconductor chips. A recent earthquake severely damaged the production facilities of Taiwanese chip-producing companies, sharply reducing the amount of chips they could produce. a. Assume that the total revenue of a typical nonTaiwanese chip manufacturer rises due to these events. In terms of an elasticity, what must be true for this to happen? Illustrate the change in total revenue with a diagram, indicating the price effect and the quantity effect of the Taiwan earthquake on this company's total revenue. b. Now assume that the total revenue of a typical nonTaiwanese chip manufacturer falls due to these events. In terms of an elasticity, what must be true for this to happen? Illustrate the change in total revenue with a diagram, indicating the price effect and the quantity effect of the Taiwan earthquake on this company's total revenue.

The U.S. government is considering reducing the amount of carbon dioxide that firms are allowed to produce by issuing a limited number of tradable allowances for carbon dioxide \(\left(\mathrm{CO}_{2}\right)\) emissions. In an April 25 , 2007, report, the U.S. Congressional Budget Office (CBO) argues that "most of the cost of meeting a cap on \(\mathrm{CO}_{2}\) emissions would be borne by consumers, who would face persistently higher prices for products such as electricity and gasoline \(\ldots\) poorer households would bear a larger burden relative to their income than wealthier households would." What assumption about one of the elasticities you learned about in this chapter has to be true for poorer households to be disproportionately affected?

Use an elasticity concept to explain each of the following observations. a. During economic booms, the number of new personal care businesses, such as gyms and tanning salons, is proportionately greater than the number of other new businesses, such as grocery stores. b. Cement is the primary building material in Mexico. After new technology makes cement cheaper to produce, the supply curve for the Mexican cement industry becomes relatively flatter. c. Some goods that were once considered luxuries, like a telephone, are now considered virtual necessities. As a result, the demand curve for telephone services has become steeper over time. d. Consumers in a less developed country like Guatemala spend proportionately more of their income on equipment for producing things at home, like sewing machines, than consumers in a more developed country like Canada.

What can you conclude about the price elasticity of demand in each of the following statements? a. "The pizza delivery business in this town is very competitive. I'd lose half my customers if I raised the price by as little as \(10 \%\)." b. "I owned both of the two Jerry Garcia autographed lithographs in existence. I sold one on eBay for a high price. But when I sold the second one, the price dropped by \(80 \%\)." c. "My economics professor has chosen to use the Krugman/Wells textbook for this class. I have no choice but to buy this book." d. "I always spend a total of exactly \(\$ 10\) per week on coffee."

The accompanying table gives part of the supply schedule for personal computers in the United States. $$ \begin{array}{c|c} \text { Price of computer } & \text { Quantity of computers supplied } \\\ \$ 1,100 & 12,000 \\\ 900 & 8,000 \end{array} $$ a. Calculate the price elasticity of supply when the price increases from $\$ 900\( to \)\$ 1,100$ using the midpoint method. Is it elastic, inelastic or unit-elastic? b. Suppose firms produce 1,000 more computers at any given price due to improved technology. As price increases from \(\$ 900\) to \(\$ 1,100\), is the price elasticity of supply now greater than, less than, or the same as it was in part a? c. Suppose a longer time period under consideration means that the quantity supplied at any given price is \(20 \%\) higher than the figures given in the table. As price increases from \(\$ 900\) to \(\$ 1,100,\) is the price elasticity of supply now greater than, less than, or the same as it was in part a?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free