All states impose excise taxes on gasoline. According to data from the Federal Highway Administration, the state of California imposes an excise tax of $\$ 0.40$ per gallon of gasoline. In 2013, gasoline sales in California totaled 18.4 billion gallons. What was California's tax revenue from the gasoline excise tax? If California doubled the excise tax, would tax revenue double? Why or why not?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Explain your answer. Answer: No, doubling the excise tax on gasoline in California does not necessarily double the tax revenue. This is because the demand for gasoline could change due to the increased tax, which depends on factors like price elasticity, economic conditions, and alternative transportation options. Higher tax might lead to higher prices for consumers, which could result in lower consumption rates, or it may have no significant effect on consumption, depending on these factors.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate California's tax revenue from gasoline excise tax

To calculate the tax revenue, we will multiply the excise tax per gallon by the total gallons of gasoline sold in California. Excise tax per gallon = $0.40 Total gallons sold = 18.4 billion gallons Tax revenue = excise tax per gallon * total gallons sold Tax revenue = $0.40 * 18.4\text{ billion gallons}
02

Compute the tax revenue

Calculate the tax revenue: Tax revenue = $0.40 * 18.4\text{ billion gallons} = \$7.36\text{ billion} So, California's tax revenue from the gasoline excise tax was $7.36 billion.
03

Analyze if doubling the tax revenue would double the tax revenue

Doubling the excise tax would result in the new excise tax being: New excise tax per gallon = \(0.40 * 2 = \)0.80 However, we cannot assume that doubling the tax would double the revenue because it might affect the demand for gasoline. Increasing the tax could result in higher prices for consumers, which could lead to lower consumption rates. Alternatively, it may also not have a significant effect on consumption and thus double the tax revenue. The way demand for gasoline reacts to tax changes depends on various factors, such as price elasticity, economic conditions, and alternative transportation options. In summary, tax revenue from gasoline excise tax in California was $7.36 billion. Doubling the excise tax might not necessarily double the tax revenue, as the demand for gasoline could change due to the increased tax.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The U.S. government would like to help the Americar auto industry compete against foreign automaker: that sell trucks in the United States. It can do this by imposing an excise tax on each foreign truck sold in the United States. The hypothetical pre-tax demand anc supply schedules for imported trucks are given in the accompanying table. a. In the absence of government interference, what is the equilibrium price of an imported truck? The equilibrium quantity? Illustrate with a diagram. b. Assume that the government imposes an excise tax of \(\$ 3,000\) per imported truck. Illustrate the effect of this excise tax in your diagram from part a. How many imported trucks are now purchased and at what price? How much does the foreign automaker receive per truck? c. Calculate the government revenue raised by the excise tax in part b. Illustrate it on your diagram. d. How does the excise tax on imported trucks benefit American automakers? Whom does it hurt? How does inefficiency arise from this government policy?

Assess the following four tax policies in terms of the benefits principle versus the ability-to-pay principle. a. A tax on gasoline that finances maintenance of state roads b. An \(8 \%\) tax on imported goods valued in excess of \(\$ 800\) per household brought in on passenger flights c. Airline-flight landing fees that pay for air traffic control d. A reduction in the amount of income tax paid based on the number of dependent children in the household.

You are advising the government on how to pay for national defense. There are two proposals for a tax system to fund national defense. Under both proposals, the tax base is an individual's income. Under proposal A, all citizens pay exactly the same lump-sum tax, regardless of income. Under proposal B, individuals with higher incomes pay a greater proportion of their income in taxes. a. Is the tax in proposal A progressive, proportional, or regressive? What about the tax in proposal B? b. Is the tax in proposal A based on the ability-to-pay principle or on the benefits principle? What about the tax in proposal \(\mathrm{B}\) ? c. In terms of efficiency, which tax is better? Explain.

You work for the Council of Economic Advisers, providing economic advice to the White House. The president wants to overhaul the income tax system and asks your advice. Suppose that the current income tax system consists of a proportional tax of \(10 \%\) on all income and that there is one person in the country who earns \(\$ 110\) million; everyone else earns less than \(\$ 100\) million. The president proposes a tax cut targeted at the very rich so that the new tax system would consist of a proportional tax of \(10 \%\) on all income up to \(\$ 100\) million and a marginal tax rate of \(0 \%\) (no tax) on income above \(\$ 100\) million. You are asked to evaluate this tax proposal. a. For incomes of \(\$ 100\) million or less, is this proposed tax system progressive, regressive, or proportional? For incomes of more than \(\$ 100\) million? Explain. b. Would this tax system create more or less tax revenue, other things equal? Is this tax system more or less efficient than the current tax system? Explain.

The United States imposes an excise tax on the sale of domestic airline tickets. Let's assume that in 2013 the total excise tax was \(\$ 6.10\) per airline ticket (consisting of the \(\$ 3.60\) flight segment tax plus the $\$ 2.50$ September 11 fee). According to data from the Bureau of Transportation Statistics, in 2013, 643 million passengers traveled on domestic airline trips at an average price of \(\$ 380\) per trip. The accompanying table shows the supply and demand schedules for airline trips. The quantity demanded at the average price of \(\$ 380\) is actual data; the rest is hypothetical. a. What is the government tax revenue in 2013 from the excise tax? b. On January 1, 2014, the total excise tax increased to \(\$ 6.20\) per ticket. What is the quantity of tickets transacted now? What is the average ticket price now? What is the 2014 government tax revenue? c. Does this increase in the excise tax increase or decrease government tax revenue?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free