Log out Go to App
Go to App

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 1: Problem 11

In a paper written by Bentley College economists Patricia M. Flynn and Michael A. Quinn, the authors state: We find evidence that Economics is a good choice of major for those aspiring to become a CEO [chief executive officer]. When adjusting for the size of the pool of graduates, those with undergraduate degrees in Economics are shown to have had a greater likelihood of becoming an S\&P 500 CEO than any other major. A list of famous economics majors published by Marietta College includes business leaders Elon Musk, Warren Buffett, Steve Ballmer, David Rockefeller, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Bill Belichick, Diane von Furstenberg, and Sam Walton, as well as Presidents George H.W. Bush, Gerald Ford, Ronald Reagan, and Donald Trump, and Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor. Why might studying economics be particularly good preparation for being the top manager of a corporation or a leader in government?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Studying economics can be particularly beneficial for top management and leadership roles because it provides the skills required for effective decision-making, understanding of economic policies, strategic planning and forecasting based on market trends, and a deep understanding of societal trends and global impacts. These competencies allow leaders to make informed and socially responsible choices that can positively influence their organization and its environment.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the role of economics in decision making

Economics is the study of how individuals, businesses, and governments allocate resources to fulfill their needs and wants. This involves making strategic decisions that optimize the use of these resources. In top management or government leadership, making informed decisions is crucial. Thus, studying economics provides the necessary knowledge and skills to analyze data, understand economic trends, and make effective decisions.
02

Recognizing the importance of economic policies

Studying economics helps one understand the effects of economic policies on businesses and the economy at large. In the role of a CEO or a political leader, one might need to adjust business strategies or policy guidelines based on these economic policies. Therefore, a solid background in economics aids in understanding and navigating these complexities.
03

Linking economics with strategic planning and forecasting

Economics involves the study of market trends, supply and demand, and other economic indicators. This knowledge is crucial in strategic planning, as it helps leaders to forecast market reactions and formulate strategies accordingly. Thus, studying economics can aid in future planning and prediction, which are key skills for any top manager or leader.
04

Understanding the broader impacts of economics

Finally, economics is not just about numbers. It also involves understanding societal trends, population behaviors, and global impacts. This broader perspective can help leaders in corporations and government to develop strategies that are not only economically sound, but also socially responsible and globally conscious.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Start your free trial

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Briefly explain whether you agree with the following assertion: Microeconomics is concerned with things that happen in one particular place, such as the unemployment rate in one city. In contrast, macroeconomics is concerned with things that affect the country as a whole, such as how the rate of teenage smoking in the United States would be affected by an increase in the tax on cigarettes.

The Apply the Concept feature explains that there are both positive and normative aspects to the debate over whether the federal government should enact tariffs on imports of cars from Mexico. What economic statistics would be most useful in evaluating the positive elements in this debate? Assuming that these statistics are available or could be gathered, are they likely to resolve the normative issues in this debate?

The federal government subsidizes some loans to college students. Typically, the more students who participate in these programs and the more they borrow, the higher the cost to the federal government. In 2011, President Barack Obama convinced Congress to pass these changes to the federal student loan programs: (1) Payments were capped at 10 percent of a borrower's discretionary income; (2) any unpaid balances for people working for government or in the nonprofit sector were forgiven after making 120 monthly payments (10 years' worth of payments); and (3) people working in the private sector had their loans forgiven after making 240 monthly payments (20 years of payments). a. As a result of these changes in the federal student loan program, would you predict that the total amount that students borrowed under these programs increased or decreased? Briefly explain. b. As part of his 2016 federal budget proposal, President Obama recommended significant changes to the federal student loan programs. Given your answer to part (a), do you think President Obama was likely to have recommended changes that would increase or changes that would decrease the payments that borrowers would have to make? Briefly explain. c. How might President Obama and his advisers have failed to correctly forecast the effects of the 2011 changes to the loan programs?

What is scarcity? Why is scarcity central to the study of economics?

In a market economy, why does a firm have a strong incentive to be productively efficient and allocatively efficient? What does the firm earn if it is productively and allocatively efficient, and what happens if it is not?
See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free