Log out Go to App
Go to App

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 1: Problem 4

What is the difference between efficiency and equity? Why do government policymakers often face a trade-off between efficiency and equity?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Efficiency refers to the optimal use of resources to maximize satisfaction, while equity refers to the fair distribution of resources. Policymakers often face a trade-off between the two as increasing efficiency may result in inequity and improving equity could bring about inefficiency. Examples include policy choices like tax systems, healthcare, and social programs.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Efficiency and Equity

Efficiency in economic terms refers to the optimal allocation of resources to maximize the total output or satisfaction. An economy is considered efficient if there is no other way to allocate resources that can create more satisfaction without lowering the satisfaction of someone else. This situation is often referred to as Pareto efficiency. On the other hand, equity refers to fairness in the distribution of resources among various members of a society. An equitable scenario wouldn't necessarily mean everyone gets an equal share of resources, but rather a fair share considering various factors like work input, needs, contribution, etc.
02

Elucidate the Trade-off

Government policymakers often face a trade-off between efficiency and equity. This is because, while efficiency aims at maximizing total output, it may not always result in a fair distribution of resources. For instance, consider a scenario where a policy can increase total national income (efficiency), but all the increase goes to the wealthiest individuals (inequity). Similarly, another policy might aim to redistribute income more equally (equity), but in doing so, it might discourage work or investment, leading to a lower overall income (inefficiency). This is the fundamental trade-off.
03

Examples

Examples of this could include income tax policy. An income tax that heavily taxes the rich to distribute wealth more equally would increase equity, but may decrease efficiency by discouraging people from working or investing. On the contrary, a minimalistic income tax approach could lead to greater economic efficiency (more investment, innovation, and hard work), but can lead to a vast rich-poor gap i.e. lower equity.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Start your free trial

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

What is scarcity? Why is scarcity central to the study of economics?

Briefly explain whether you agree with the following assertion: Microeconomics is concerned with things that happen in one particular place, such as the unemployment rate in one city. In contrast, macroeconomics is concerned with things that affect the country as a whole, such as how the rate of teenage smoking in the United States would be affected by an increase in the tax on cigarettes.

Leonard Fleck, a philosophy professor at Michigan State University, has written: When it comes to health care in America, we have limited resources for unlimited health care needs. We want everything contemporary medical technology can offer that will improve the length or quality of our lives as we age. But as presently healthy taxpayers, we want costs controlled. Why is it necessary for all economic systems to limit services such as health care? How does a market system prevent people from getting as many goods and services as they want?

Would you expect a centrally planned economy to be better at productive efficiency or allocative efficiency? Be sure to define productive efficiency and allocative efficiency in your answer.

Consider an organization that exists to help the poor. The members of the organization are discussing alternative methods of aiding the poor, when a proponent of one particular method asserts, "If even one poor person is helped with this method, then all our time and money would have been worth it." If you were a member of the organization, how would you reply to this assertion?
See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free