Shawn Van Dyke, a construction industry consultant, wrote on a home building site: Brains do some pretty funny things when making a buying decision. If you understand your customers' brain activities, then you can use this knowledge to help increase your sales and deliver on value. \(\ldots\) There's an old question in advertising. "How do you sell a \(\$ 2,000\) watch? Put it next to a \(\$ 10,000\) watch." This is an example of price anchoring. a. What is price anchoring? b. Explain why Van Dyke cited the "old advertising question" as an example of price anchoring.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Price anchoring is a tactic where the first price a consumer sees influences their perception of subsequent prices. Van Dyke's example talks about how, by placing a \$2,000 watch next to a \$10,000 one, the first serves as an 'anchor' that makes the second one seem cheaper and thus more attractive to prospective buyers.

Step by step solution

01

Definition of Price Anchoring

Price anchoring is a psychological phenomenon in sales where the first price a consumer sees sets an expectation of price in their mind, also known as the 'anchor'. This anchor price then influences their perception of subsequent prices. When a consumer sees a high-priced item first, and then encounters a similar but cheaper item, the second item appears more attractive due to the initial anchor price.
02

Explanation of the Example

Van Dyke used the question 'How do you sell a \$2,000 watch? Put it next to a \$10,000 watch.' as an example of price anchoring because the high price of the \$10,000 watch serves as an anchor that makes the \$2,000 watch seem much more affordable in comparison. A customer who might balk at spending \$2,000 on a watch might reconsider when they see the price in relation to the \$10,000 watch. So, even though \$2,000 is itself a high price for a watch, appearing less expensive relative to a far more expensive option makes the buyer perceive it as better value.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Marvin visits his aunt and uncle, who live in Milwaukee. The Milwaukee Bucks basketball team is scheduled to play a home game against the Golden State Warriors during Marvin's visit. An online broker has a ticket for sale in Section 212 of the arena where the game will be played, but the price, \(\$ 75,\) is more than Marvin is willing to pay. From another online ticket broker he buys a ticket for \(\$ 50\) for a seat in Section 212 of the arena. On the day of the game, a friend of Marvin's uncle offers to pay Marvin \(\$ 75\) for his ticket. He declines the offer. How can Marvin's refusal to sell his ticket be explained?

A columnist on forbes.com noted that many poor people have diets that are high in carbohydrates, such as potatoes, rice, or bread, with relatively little protein from meat or fish. He said that as a consumer in this situation, if the price of the carbohydrates in your diet rises, "you'll cut out the more expensive fish, bacon or pork in order to buy more of that basic carbohydrate. And that's what a Giffen Good is." Explain his reasoning that in this situation the carbohydrate is a Giffen good.

Someone who owns a townhouse wrote to a real estate advice columnist to ask whether he should sell his townhouse or wait and sell it in the future, when he hoped that prices would be higher. The columnist replied: "Ask yourself: Would you buy this townhouse today as an investment? Because every day you don't sell it, you're buying it." Do you agree with the columnist? In what sense are you buying something if you don't sell it? Should the owner's decision about whether to sell depend on what price he originally paid for the townhouse?

How does the fact that consumers apparently value fairness affect the pricing decisions that businesses make?

(Related to the Apply the Concept on page 346) In 2012 , the San Francisco Giants Major League Baseball team signed pitcher Matt Cain to a contract that paid him a salary of \(\$ 20\) million per year from 2013 through 2017 . The annual salaries were all guaranteed, and the Giants had to pay Cain whether he performed well or not \(-\) and they had to pay him even if the team released him and he no longer played for the Giants. During \(2016,\) Cain pitched ineffectively, and at the beginning of the 2017 season, it was uncertain whether the Giants would keep him as a regular player. Giants General Manager Bobby Evans was quoted as saying that in the decision on Cain, his salary wasn't a factor: "It's really not about the money at this point." Is Evans's analysis correct? Should the salary the Giants are paying Cain matter in deciding whether to keep him on the team? Would the team's decision be affected if Cain were receiving the Major League Baseball minimum salary of \(\$ 535,000 ?\) Briefly explain.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free