Which of the following products are most likely to have significant network externalities? Briefly explain. a. Smartphones b. Dog food c. Board games d. LCD televisions e. 3D televisions

Short Answer

Expert verified
Among the listed products, 'Smartphones' are most likely to have significant network externalities due to the high level of user interaction and data sharing. 'Board Games' and '3D televisions' can have some degree of network externalities, but these are not as strong as for smartphones. 'Dog Food' and 'LCD Televisions' are unlikely to have network externalities as their value does not increase with the number of users.

Step by step solution

01

Analyzing the first product

First, consider the product 'Smartphones'. Smartphones are technology-based products that rely heavily on user interaction and data sharing. The more people using smartphones, the more valuable these devices become due to the increase in available apps, sharing of information, and ease of communication. Hence, smartphones have significant network externalities.
02

Analyzing the second product

Next, reflect on 'Dog Food'. Dog food does not offer increased value with more users. The value of dog food to a user does not depend on how many other users are also purchasing or using dog food. Therefore, it does not have network externalities.
03

Analyzing the third product

Consider 'Board Games'. Board games might have some degree of network effect. The reason is that the more people play the game, the more potential players you might have to play with. The game's popularity might make it more interesting due to improved rules, additional players, or increased competition. However, this network effect is significantly less than that of smartphones.
04

Analyzing the fourth product

Consider 'LCD televisions'. Similar to dog food, the use and value of LCD televisions do not depend on the number of people using them. Hence, LCD Televisions do not have network externalities.
05

Analyzing the fifth product

Lastly, consider '3D televisions'. The value of 3D televisions is slightly tied to network externalities. This is because the more users there are, the more demand there would be for 3D content. However, this network effect is not as strong as smartphones.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In studying the consumption of very poor families in China, Robert Jensen and Nolan Miller found that in both Hunan and Gansu, "Giffen behavior is most likely to be found among a range of households that are poor (but not too poor or too rich)." a. What do Jensen and Miller mean by "Giffen behavior"? b. Why would the poorest of the poor be less likely than people with slightly higher incomes to exhibit this behavior? c. Why must a good make up a very large portion of consumers' budgets to be a Giffen good?

Someone who owns a townhouse wrote to a real estate advice columnist to ask whether he should sell his townhouse or wait and sell it in the future, when he hoped that prices would be higher. The columnist replied: "Ask yourself: Would you buy this townhouse today as an investment? Because every day you don't sell it, you're buying it." Do you agree with the columnist? In what sense are you buying something if you don't sell it? Should the owner's decision about whether to sell depend on what price he originally paid for the townhouse?

What are network externalities? For what types of products are network externalities likely to be important? What is path dependence?

Does the law of diminishing marginal utility hold true in every situation? Is it possible to think of goods for which consuming additional units, at least initially, will result in increasing marginal utility?

Considering only the income effect, if the price of an inferior good declines, would a consumer want to buy a larger quantity or a smaller quantity of the good? Does your answer mean that the demand curves for inferior goods should slope upward? Briefly explain.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free