An article in the Wall Street Journal reported that customers who shopped at Neiman Marcus and other high-end retailers were becoming more resistant to paying high prices for clothing and accessories: High-end [retailers] which raised prices incessantly over the past decade, are learning the hard way that even wealthy customers are hunting for better deals and selection, whether online or at shops run by individual brands. ... Neiman's Chief Executive Karen Katz \(\ldots\) reduced snob appeal by allowing Neiman shoppers to use Visa and MasterCard. Previously, the stores only accepted American Express or Neiman credit cards. a. What does the article mean by "snob appeal"? Is there an economic explanation for it? Briefly explain. b. Why might losing snob appeal be a problem for highend retailers like Neiman Marcus?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The term 'snob appeal' signifies the status or exclusivity element tied to a product or service. The economic explanation for it can be associated with the theory of conspicuous consumption, where consumers gain satisfaction not just from the product/service but also from the associated status. Losing 'snob appeal' can potentially damage high-end retailers like Neiman Marcus as it can dilute their brand image and status, leading to diminished sales and profitability, as customers might not be qualified to pay premium prices anymore.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Snob Appeal

The term 'snob appeal' is used to describe a situation in which a product, or in this case a shopping experience, is appealing because it is considered exclusive or high status. This appeal is often associated with luxury brands and is usually related to factors such as high price, exclusive distribution, or unique design.
02

Economic Explanation for Snob Appeal

From an economic perspective, snob appeal can be explained by the concept of 'conspicuous consumption' proposed by Thorstein Veblen. This theory posits that people will spend more on luxury goods because they want to demonstrate their wealth and social status. Essentially, the utility derived from owning and using high-end, exclusive products is not only from the product itself but also from the status associated with owning it.
03

The implications of Losing Snob Appeal

Losing snob appeal can be a problem for high-end retailers like Neiman Marcus. If shoppers perceive that the exclusivity or high-status aspect of shopping at Neiman Marcus has lessened, they may be less willing to pay premium prices for products, looking for cheaper alternatives instead. This perception can dilute the retailer's brand image and status, potentially leading to decreased sales and profitability.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

What does it mean to be economically rational?

According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, the average price of heating oil fell to under \(\$ 3.00\) a gallon during the winter of \(2014-2015,\) the lowest price in more than four years. About 6.2 million U.S. households in the Northeast rely on the fuel to heat their homes. For the following questions, assume that no factor that affects the demand for heating oil, other than its price, changed during the winter of \(2014-2015\). a. If households in the Northeast increased their consumption of heating oil in the winter of \(2014-2015,\) can we conclude that for these households, heating oil was a normal good? Briefly explain. b. If households in the Northeast decreased their consumption of heating oil in the winter of \(2014-2015,\) can we conclude that for these households heating oil is an inferior good? Briefly explain. c. If households in the Northeast decreased their consumption of heating oil in the winter of \(2014-2015\), can we conclude that for these households heating oil is a Giffen good? Briefly explain.

Someone who owns a townhouse wrote to a real estate advice columnist to ask whether he should sell his townhouse or wait and sell it in the future, when he hoped that prices would be higher. The columnist replied: "Ask yourself: Would you buy this townhouse today as an investment? Because every day you don't sell it, you're buying it." Do you agree with the columnist? In what sense are you buying something if you don't sell it? Should the owner's decision about whether to sell depend on what price he originally paid for the townhouse?

Richard Thaler, winner of the 2017 Nobel Prize in Economics, was first to use the term endowment effect to describe placing a higher value on something already owned than would be placed on the object if not currently owned. According to an article in the Economist: Dr. Thaler, who recently had some expensive bottles of wine stolen, observes that he is "now confronted with precisely one of my own experiments: these are bottles I wasn't planning to sell and now I'm going to get a cheque from an insurance company and most of these bottles I will not buy. I'm a good enough economist to know there's a bit of an inconsistency there." Based on Thaler's statement, how do his stolen bottles of wine illustrate the endowment effect? Why did he make the statement: "I'm a good enough economist to know there's a bit of an inconsistency there"?

What is the definition of marginal utility? What is the law of diminishing marginal utility? Why is marginal utility more useful than total utility in consumer decision making?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free