In the ancient world, a book could be produced either on a scroll or as a codex, which was made of folded sheets glued together, something like a modern book. One scholar has estimated the following variable costs (in Greek drachmas) of the two methods: $$ \begin{array}{l|c|l} \hline \text { Scroll } & \text { Codex } \\ \hline \begin{array}{l} \text { Cost of writing } \\ \text { (wage of a scribe) } \end{array} & 11.33 \text { drachmas } & 11.33 \text { drachmas } \\ \hline \text { Cost of paper } & 16.50 \text { drachmas } & 9.25 \text { drachmas } \\ \hline \end{array} $$ Another scholar points out that a significant fixed cost was involved in producing a codex: In order to copy a codex \(\ldots\) the amount of text and the layout of each page had to be carefully calculated in advance to determine the exact number of sheets \(\ldots\) needed. No doubt, this is more time-consuming and calls for more experimentation than the production of a scroll would. But for the next copy, these calculations would be used again. a. Suppose that the fixed cost of preparing a codex was 58 drachmas and that there was no similar fixed cost for a scroll. Would an ancient book publisher who intended to sell 5 copies of a book be likely to publish it as a scroll or as a codex? What if the publisher intended to sell 10 copies? Briefly explain. b. Although most books were published as scrolls in the first century C.E., by the third century, most were published as codices. Considering only the factors mentioned in this problem, explain why this change may have taken place.

Short Answer

Expert verified
For 5 copies or 10 copies, an ancient book publisher would be likely to publish the book as a codex because it's cheaper per book than a scroll. The shift from scrolls to codices in the ancient publishing industry probably happened because the cost savings from producing a codex became more significant as more copies of a book were produced.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate the Total Cost for Each Method

Firstly, calculate the total cost of producing a book using each method. For a scroll, the total cost is the sum of the cost of writing and the cost of paper, which is \(11.33 + 16.50 = 27.83\) drachmas. For a codex, the total cost includes the cost of writing, the cost of paper, and the fixed cost. The total cost per book is then the total cost divided by the number of copies produced. For 5 copies, it will be \((11.33 + 9.25 + 58) / 5 = 15.716\) drachmas and for 10 copies it will be \((11.33 + 9.25 + 58) / 10 = 7.858\) drachmas.
02

Compare the Costs for Each Method and Decide Which Method to Use

The next step is to compare the total cost per book for each method and decide whether a publisher will publish the book as a scroll or a codex. For 5 copies, the cost per book for a scroll is 27.83 drachmas and for a codex is 15.716 drachmas. So a publisher would choose to publish the book as a codex. For 10 copies, the cost per book for a scroll is still 27.83 drachmas and for a codex is 7.858 drachmas. So a publisher would still choose to publish the book as a codex.
03

Explain the Historical Shift from Scrolls to Codices

The shift from scrolls to codices probably happened because as the number of copies of a book increased, the cost advantage of producing a book as a codex became greater due to the spread of the fixed cost over more copies. This suggests that as books became more popular and more copies were produced, it became more economical to produce them as codices instead of scrolls.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In recent years, the United States has experienced large increases in oil production due in large part to a new technology, hydraulic fracturing ("fracking"). Fracking involves injecting a mixture of water, sand, and chemicals into rock formations at high pressure to release oil and natural gas. An article in the Wall Street Journal indicates that economies of scale in fracking may be considerably smaller than in conventional oil drilling. If this view is correct, what would the likely consequences be for the number of firms drilling for oil in the United States?

Suppose jill Johnson operates her pizza restaurant in a building she owns in the center of the city. Similar buildings in the neighborhood rent for \(\$ 4,000\) per month. Jill is considering selling her building and renting space in the suburbs for \(\$ 3,000\) per month, but she decides not to make the move. She reasons: "I would like to have a restaurant in the suburbs, but I pay no rent for my restaurant now, and 1 don't want to see my costs rise by \(\$ 3,000\) per month." Evaluate jill's reasoning.

(Related to the Apply the Concept on page 376 ) For jill Johnson's pizza restaurant, explain whether each of the following is a fixed cost or a variable cost. a. The payment she makes on her fire insurance policy b. The payment she makes to buy pizza dough c. The wages she pays her workers d. The lease payment she makes to the landlord who owns the building where her store is located e. The \(\$ 300\) -per-month payment she makes to her local newspaper for running her weekly advertisements

Which of the following are examples of a firm experiencing positive technological change? a. A fall in the wages JetBlue pays its mechanics leads it to lower its ticket prices. b. A training program makes a firm's workers more productive. c. An exercise program makes a firm's workers healthier and reduces the number of days the typical worker is absent. d. A firm cuts its workforce and is able to maintain its initial level of output. e. A firm rearranges the layout of its factory and finds that by using its initial set of inputs, it can produce exactly as much as before.

In describing the optimal size of an investment fund, a writer for the Wall Street Journal observed: … at first, bigger is better for both investors and managers…. Managing money is expensive. Small funds have many fixed costs…. If a fund is small, it can’t generate enough fees to cover costs…. The result is that in terms of performance, funds should want to get big to cover costs and maximize returns, but not so big that diseconomies of scale erode returns. Draw a graph of a long-run average cost curve for a typical firm in the investment fund industry. In your graph, draw and label the following. a. A short-run average total cost curve for an investment fund that has not reached minimum efficient scale b. A short-run average total cost curve for an investment fund that has reached minimum efficient scale c. A short-run average total cost curve for an investment fund that experiences diseconomies of scale d. A range of output within which investment funds experience constant returns to scale

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free