(Related to the Don't Let This Happen to You on page 458) A student remarks: If firms in a monopolistically competitive industry are earning an economic profit, new firms will enter the industry. Eventually, a representative firm will find that its demand curve has shifted to the left until it is just tangent to its average total cost curve and the firm is earning zero profit. Because firms are earning zero profit at that point, some firms will leave the industry, and the representative firm will find that its demand curve will shift to the right. In long-run equilibrium, price will be above average total cost by just enough so that each firm is just breaking even. Briefly explain whether you agree with this analysis.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The analysis made by the student is partially correct with the process of entry of new firms until the firm's demand curve becomes tangent to the average total cost curve. However, the assumption that firms will leave the industry when zero profit occurs, might not always hold true, especially in the long run. In the long-run equilibrium, contrary to the assertion made by the student, the price will not be above average total, rather it will be equal to the average total cost ensuring the firm is just covering its costs.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the entry of firms

In a monopolistically competitive industry when firms are earning an economic profit, it is true that new firms get attracted and enter the industry, thus increasing the competition.
02

Effect on demand curve

This increase in competition tends to shift the demand curve of an individual firm to the left as the consumers now have more options to fulfill their demands.
03

The tangent point of demand and average total cost curve

The demand curve would continue to shift left until it becomes tangent to the firm's average total cost curve which implies that firm is now just breaking even and not making any economic profit.
04

Exit of firms and its impact

The assumption that firms will leave the industry when zero profits are being made might not always be correct, specifically in the long run. This is because firms consider their sunk costs and still operate to cover their variable costs.
05

Long-run equilibrium

In the long-run equilibrium, the price will be tangential to the average total cost, implying the firm is just covering its costs. This contradicts the statement that price will be above the average total cost in equilibrium.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Isabella runs a pet salon. She is currently grooming 125 dogs per week. If instead of grooming 125 dogs, she grooms 126 dogs, she will add \(\$ 68.50\) to her costs and \(\$ 60.00\) to her revenues. What will be the effect on her profit of grooming 126 dogs instead of 125 dogs?

(Related to the Apply the Concept on page 464) In Chicago, Green Summit appears to be running nine different restaurants, with names such as Butcher Block, Milk Money, and Leafage. In reality, all the food for these restaurants is cooked in one central kitchen, and none of the restaurants have physical locations. The brands exist only as Web sites and on the delivery containers. An article on chicagotribune.com quoted the firm's \(\mathrm{CEO}\) as saying, "I don't really think anybody cares. They just want really high-quality food." a. If nobody cares whether a restaurant exists as a physical place, why does Green Summit have a Web site for each restaurant and packaging printed with each restaurant's name and logo? Aren't Green Summit's costs higher than if it just had a single name and one Web site? b. Does Green Summit's strategy increase or decrease productive efficiency in the restaurant business? Does the strategy increase or decrease allocative efficiency? Does it increase or decrease the well-being of its customers? Briefly explain.

Does the fact that monopolistically competitive markets are not allocatively or productively efficient mean that there is a significant loss in economic well-being to society in these markets? In your answer, be sure to define what you mean by "economic well-being."

Why doesn't a monopolistically competitive firm produce where \(P=M C\), as a perfectly competitive firm does?

A skeptic says, "Marketing research and brand management are unnecessary. If a company wants to find out what customers want, it should simply look at what they're already buying." Do you agree with this comment? Explain.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free