Log out Go to App
Go to App

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 14: Problem 2

Why do economists refer to the methodology for analyzing oligopolies as game theory?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Economists refer to the methodology of analyzing oligopolies as game theory because it allows them to model and anticipate the strategic decision-making process of oligopolistic firms whose actions directly affect one another. Game theory is a suitable tool for analyzing scenarios where the outcome depends on the choices of all participants, which is characteristic of oligopolistic market structures.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Oligopoly

An oligopoly refers to a market structure where a few large firms dominate the industry. These firms have the capacity to affect market prices and decisions due to their significant market share. They often engage in activities to protect their market position, making strategic decisions that take into account the reactions and counteractions of their competitors.
02

Understanding Game Theory

Game theory is a branch of mathematics that studies decision-making in situations of competition and potential conflict. It involves studying strategic interactions, where the outcome for one participant depends on the choices of others. It can model and predict how players or participants will behave in strategic situations, and decide their optimal strategies.
03

Connecting Oligopolies and Game Theory

Game theory is particularly useful in the analysis of oligopolies due to the interdependent nature of decision-making among the competing firms in an oligopoly. The foundational assumption in game theory—that participants act strategically, anticipating the actions and reactions of their competitors—directly applies to firms operating in an oligopolistic structure. Therefore, economists use game theory as a methodology to model competition and cooperation among such firms, anticipate behaviors, and assess potential outcomes.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Start your free trial

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Give brief definitions of the following concepts. a. Game theory b. Cooperative equilibrium c. Noncooperative equilibrium d. Dominant strategy e. Nash equilibrium f. Price leadership

An economist argues that with respect to advertising in some industries, "gains to advertising firms are matched by losses to competitors" in the industry. Briefly explain the economist's reasoning. If his reasoning is correct, why do firms in these industries advertise?

When Apple first launched Apple Music, singer Taylor Swift refused to allow her album \(1989,\) which had been the best-selling album of the year, to be made available for the service because Apple did not intend to pay royalties on songs it streamed during an initial three-month period when the service would be free to subscribers. In response, Apple changed its policy and agreed to pay royalties during those three months, even though doing so reduced its profit. Do singers typically have substantial bargaining power with Apple, Spotify, and the other streaming services? Briefly explain.

World War I began in August 1914 and on the Western Front quickly bogged down into trench warfare. In Belgium and northern France, British and French troops were dug into trenches facing German troops a few hundred yards away. The troops continued firing back and forth until a remarkable event occurred, which historians have labeled "The Christmas Truce." On Christmas Eve, along several sectors of the front, British and German troops stopped firing and eventually came out into the area between the trenches to sing Christmas carols and exchange small gifts. The truce lasted until Christmas night in most areas of the front, although it continued until New Year's Day in a few areas. Most of the troops" commanding officers were unhappy with the truce- they would have preferred the troops to keep fighting through Christmas - and in the future they often used a policy of rotating troops around the front so that the same British and German troops did not face each other for more than relatively brief periods. Can game theory explain why the Christmas Truce occurred? Can game theory help explain why the commanding officers' strategy was successful in reducing future unauthorized truces?

For several years, a professor at Johns Hopkins University used the following grading scheme for his final exam: He would give an \(A\) to the student with the highest score. The grades of the remaining students were then based on what percentage their scores were of the top student's score. But at the end of one semester, the students in his class decided to boycott the final exam. They stood in the hallway outside the classroom but did not enter the room to take the exam. After waiting for a time, the professor cancelled the exam and, applying his grading scale, gave everyone in the class an \(\mathrm{A}\) on the exam. An article in the New York Times about this incident observes: "This is an amazing game theory outcome, and not one that economists would likely predict." Do you agree with this observation that game theory indicates the students' strategy was unlikely to work? Briefly explain.
See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free