Bob and Tom are two criminals who have been arrested for burglary. The police put Bob and Tom in separate cells. They offer to let Bob go free if he confesses to the crime and testifies against Tom. Bob also is told that he will serve a 15 -year prison sentence if he remains silent while Tom confesses. If Bob confesses and Tom also confesses, they will each serve a 10-year sentence. Separately, the police make the same offer to Tom. Assume that Bob and Tom know that if they both remain silent, the police have only enough evidence to convict them of a lesser crime, and they will both serve 3 -year sentences. a. Use the information provided to write a payoff matrix for Bob and Tom. b. Does Bob have a dominant strategy? If so, what is it? c. Does Tom have a dominant strategy? If so, what is it? d. What prison sentences do Bob and Tom serve? How might they have avoided this outcome?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The payoff matrix for Bob and Tom is \[ \begin{bmatrix} (10,10) & (0,15) \ (15,0) & (3,3) \end{bmatrix} \]. Both Bob and Tom have a dominant strategy to confess. Therefore, they will each serve a 10-year sentence. They could have avoided this outcome and only served a 3-year sentence if they both remained silent.

Step by step solution

01

Construct the Payoff Matrix

First, create a 2x2 matrix with Bob’s strategic choices, confess or remain silent, along one dimension, and Tom's strategic choices along the other. The matrix cells contain the corresponding payoffs: \[ \begin{bmatrix} (10,10) & (0,15) \ (15,0) & (3,3) \end{bmatrix} \]. The first number in each pair represents Bob’s sentence while the second represents Tom's.
02

Identify Bob's Dominant Strategy

Now compare Bob’s sentence for each of his possible actions (Confess or Remain Silent) given each of Tom’s actions. Bob prefers to confess whether Tom confesses or remains silent because in each case, confessing leads to less jail time (10 years compared to 15 years if Tom confesses, and 0 years compared to 3 years if Tom remains silent). Thus, Bob's dominant strategy is to confess.
03

Identify Tom's Dominant Strategy

Perform a similar analysis for Tom by comparing his sentences for each of his possible actions given each of Bob’s actions. Tom also prefers to confess whether Bob confesses or remains silent (10 years instead of 15 years if Bob confesses, and no jail time instead of 3 years if Bob remains silent). Thus, Tom's dominant strategy is to confess.
04

Determine Their Prison Sentences

Since both possess a dominant strategy to confess, in equilibrium, both Bob and Tom will confess. Using the payoff matrix, we find that when both confess, they each will serve 10 years.
05

Discuss the Possible Different Outcome

They each could have avoided a 10-year sentence if they had both remained silent, in which case they would have each served 3 years. However, because they couldn't communicate and coordinate their strategies, they were unable to achieve this outcome.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Briefly explain which of the five competitive forces is involved in each of these business developments. a. The effect on Apple as Microsoft introduces the Surface Laptop computer b. The effect on McDonald's as White Castle and Taco Bell start selling breakfast food c. The effect on Target retail stores when Harry's razors cuts into Gillette's share of the razor market d. The effect on the publishing firm Hachette when Amazon bargains to lower the prices of the books Hachette sells on Amazon's site e. The effect on the AMC movie theater chain of IMAX increasing the fees it charges to theaters to use its technology

For several years, a professor at Johns Hopkins University used the following grading scheme for his final exam: He would give an \(A\) to the student with the highest score. The grades of the remaining students were then based on what percentage their scores were of the top student's score. But at the end of one semester, the students in his class decided to boycott the final exam. They stood in the hallway outside the classroom but did not enter the room to take the exam. After waiting for a time, the professor cancelled the exam and, applying his grading scale, gave everyone in the class an \(\mathrm{A}\) on the exam. An article in the New York Times about this incident observes: "This is an amazing game theory outcome, and not one that economists would likely predict." Do you agree with this observation that game theory indicates the students' strategy was unlikely to work? Briefly explain.

Michael Porter argued that in many industries, "strategies converge and competition becomes a series of races down identical paths that no one can win." Briefly explain whether firms in these industries will likely earn economic profits.

What is a sequential game?

Suppose there are four large manufacturers of toilet tissue. The largest of these manufacturers announces that it will raise its prices by 15 percent due to higher paper costs. Within three days, the other three large toilet tissue manufacturers announce similar price hikes. Would this decision to raise prices be evidence of explicit collusion among the four companies? Briefly explain.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free