When Apple first launched Apple Music, singer Taylor Swift refused to allow her album \(1989,\) which had been the best-selling album of the year, to be made available for the service because Apple did not intend to pay royalties on songs it streamed during an initial three-month period when the service would be free to subscribers. In response, Apple changed its policy and agreed to pay royalties during those three months, even though doing so reduced its profit. Do singers typically have substantial bargaining power with Apple, Spotify, and the other streaming services? Briefly explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Singers can have substantial bargaining power over streaming platforms, though the level of this power can vary significantly based on individual circumstances such as popularity, fan base, and the competitive landscape of streaming platforms. However, it's not universal and depends on numerous factors.

Step by step solution

01

Review the Taylor Swift Case

The situation with Taylor Swift and Apple music provides a relevant starting point to understand the negotiation dynamics between artists and streaming platforms. Looking at this case, it's clear that Swift had substantial bargaining power over Apple, given her influence and the success of her album '1989'.
02

Analyzing The Structure of Streaming Services Industry

In the music streaming industry, the primary source of value is the music content i.e., songs produced by the artists. This implies that the presence or absence of a popular artist's music on a platform can directly impact the platform's user base and revenues. Considering this interdependence, artists do have a level of bargaining power.
03

Consider The Variety of Artists

Despite the narrative painted by the Taylor Swift situation, not all artists share the same level of influence. Established, internationally popular artists often have more bargaining power compared to emerging or less-known artists. These smaller artists may lack the leverage to negotiate terms to their advantage.
04

Evaluation of Bargaining Power

By taking into consideration the various factors, we can conclude that the bargaining power of artists with streaming platforms varies. While it would be incorrect to state that all artists or singers have substantial bargaining power, it is equally worded to dismiss their influence entirely. Factors such as an artist's popularity, the consumer fan base, and the competitive landscape of streaming platforms collectively define an artist's bargaining power.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

What do barriers to entry have to do with the extent of competition in an industry? What is the most important reason that some industries, such as music streaming, are dominated by just a few firms?

Give brief definitions of the following concepts. a. Game theory b. Cooperative equilibrium c. Noncooperative equilibrium d. Dominant strategy e. Nash equilibrium f. Price leadership

What is a sequential game?

Briefly explain which of the five competitive forces is involved in each of these business developments. a. The effect on Apple as Microsoft introduces the Surface Laptop computer b. The effect on McDonald's as White Castle and Taco Bell start selling breakfast food c. The effect on Target retail stores when Harry's razors cuts into Gillette's share of the razor market d. The effect on the publishing firm Hachette when Amazon bargains to lower the prices of the books Hachette sells on Amazon's site e. The effect on the AMC movie theater chain of IMAX increasing the fees it charges to theaters to use its technology

Bob and Tom are two criminals who have been arrested for burglary. The police put Bob and Tom in separate cells. They offer to let Bob go free if he confesses to the crime and testifies against Tom. Bob also is told that he will serve a 15 -year prison sentence if he remains silent while Tom confesses. If Bob confesses and Tom also confesses, they will each serve a 10-year sentence. Separately, the police make the same offer to Tom. Assume that Bob and Tom know that if they both remain silent, the police have only enough evidence to convict them of a lesser crime, and they will both serve 3 -year sentences. a. Use the information provided to write a payoff matrix for Bob and Tom. b. Does Bob have a dominant strategy? If so, what is it? c. Does Tom have a dominant strategy? If so, what is it? d. What prison sentences do Bob and Tom serve? How might they have avoided this outcome?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free